1 (i) The function f is given by
f(β)=β−β1−β21(β=0).
Find the stationary point of the curve y=f(β) and sketch the curve.
Sketch also the curve y=g(β), where
g(β)=β+β3−β21(β=0).
(ii) Let u and v be the roots of the equation
x2+αx+β=0,
where β=0. Obtain expressions in terms of α and β for u+v+uv1 and u1+v1+uv.
(iii) Given that u+v+uv1=−1, and that u and v are real, show that u1+v1+uv⩽−1.
(iv) Given instead that u+v+uv1=3, and that u and v are real, find the greatest value of u1+v1+uv.
Hint
Differentiating f(β) and setting equal to zero yields a cubic equation with a single real root, the quadratic factor being demonstrated to be non-zero either by completing the square or considering the discriminant. The stationary point is thus (−1,−1) and with the asymptote y=β the sketch results.
The same strategy for g(β) yields a cubic equation with three real roots, two being coincident, and thus a maximum (−2,−415) and a point of inflection (1,3).
Employing Vieta’s formulae gives u+v+uv1=−α+β1 and u1+v1+uv=β−α+β. The first condition of part (iii) enables an expression for α to be obtained in terms of β, and so the subject of the required inequality is f(β). When the discriminant condition is employed to impose the reality of u and v, the resulting cubic inequality has a quadratic factor which should be demonstrated to be positive (similarly to part (i)) and hence β≤1 which by reference to part (i), gives the requested result. Part (iv) follows the same strategy as (iii) except that it makes use of g(β) and the reality condition cubic inequality has a squared linear factor which allows β=1 as well as β≤41, and so by reference to the sketch, the greatest value is 3. The reader might like to consider what effect it would have on parts (iii) and (iv) if the extra condition u=v were to be imposed.
Model Solution
Part (i)
Differentiate f(β)=β−β−1−β−2:
f′(β)=1+β−2+2β−3
Setting f′(β)=0 and multiplying by β3:
β3+β+2=0
Testing β=−1: (−1)3+(−1)+2=0, so (β+1) is a factor. Dividing:
β3+β+2=(β+1)(β2−β+2)
The discriminant of β2−β+2 is 1−8=−7<0, so β2−β+2>0 for all real β. Hence β=−1 is the only real root, giving the unique stationary point.
f(−1)=−1−−11−(−1)21=−1+1−1=−1
The stationary point is (−1,−1).
As β→±∞, f(β)∼β, so y=β is an oblique asymptote. As β→0±, f(β)→−∞ (dominated by −β−2).
For g(β)=β+3β−1−β−2:
g′(β)=1−3β−2+2β−3
Setting g′(β)=0 and multiplying by β3:
β3−3β+2=0
Testing β=1: 1−3+2=0, so (β−1) is a factor. Dividing:
β3−3β+2=(β−1)(β2+β−2)=(β−1)2(β+2)
So β=1 (double root) and β=−2.
g(−2)=−2+−23−41=−48−46−41=−415g(1)=1+3−1=3
To classify, write g′(β)=β3(β−1)2(β+2). Near β=−2: (β−1)2>0, (β+2) changes sign from − to +, and β3<0, so g′ changes from + to −: this is a maximum. At β=1: g′ does not change sign (squared factor), so this is a point of inflection.
The sketch of g has asymptote y=β, a maximum at (−2,−415), and a horizontal point of inflection at (1,3).
Part (ii)
By Vieta’s formulae for x2+αx+β=0: u+v=−α and uv=β.
u+v+uv1=−α+β1
u1+v1+uv=uvu+v+uv=β−α+β
Part (iii)
Given u+v+uv1=−1:
−α+β1=−1⟹α=1+β1
Substituting into the expression from (ii):
u1+v1+uv=β−α+β=−β1(1+β1)+β=β−β1−β21=f(β)
For u and v to be real, the discriminant must satisfy α2−4β⩾0:
(1+β1)2−4β⩾0
Expanding and multiplying by β2>0:
β2+2β+1−4β3⩾0−4β3+β2+2β+1⩾0
Testing β=1: −4+1+2+1=0, so (β−1) is a factor. Dividing:
−4β3+β2+2β+1=−(β−1)(4β2+3β+1)
The discriminant of 4β2+3β+1 is 9−16=−7<0, so 4β2+3β+1>0 for all real β.
Now examine f(β)+1:
f(β)+1=β−β1−β21+1=β2β3+β2−β−1
Factor the numerator:
β3+β2−β−1=β2(β+1)−(β+1)=(β+1)(β2−1)=(β+1)2(β−1)
So f(β)+1=β2(β+1)2(β−1).
For β⩽1 and β=0: (β+1)2⩾0, (β−1)⩽0, and β2>0. Hence f(β)+1⩽0, i.e.
u1+v1+uv⩽−1■
Part (iv)
Given u+v+uv1=3:
−α+β1=3⟹α=β1−3
Substituting into the expression from (ii):
u1+v1+uv=−β1(β1−3)+β=β+β3−β21=g(β)
For u and v to be real, α2−4β⩾0:
(β1−3)2−4β⩾0
Expanding and multiplying by β2>0:
1−6β+9β2−4β3⩾0
Testing β=1: 1−6+9−4=0, so (β−1) is a factor. Dividing:
−4β3+9β2−6β+1=−(β−1)(4β2−5β+1)=−(β−1)2(4β−1)
So −(β−1)2(4β−1)⩾0. Since (β−1)2⩾0, this requires 4β−1⩽0, i.e. β⩽41. The case β=1 also satisfies the inequality (with equality).
So the allowed values are β⩽41 (with β=0) or β=1.
From the sketch of g in part (i): on (−∞,0), g has a maximum of −415 at β=−2. On (0,41], g is increasing (since g′>0 for 0<β<1) with g(41)=41+12−16=−415. At β=1: g(1)=3.
Therefore the greatest value is 3, achieved when β=1 (and α=−2, giving u=v=1).
Examiner Notes
As usual, this was the most popular question to be attempted with more than 93% of candidates doing so. However, scoring for it was only moderately good with a mean below 9/20. Most successfully differentiated and obtained a value for β from the cubic but ignored considering whether this was the only stationary point. Sketchs frequently did not display the asymptote; some that did showed the negative branch of the curve touching rather than intersecting the asymptote at the maximum. Many did not appreciate that to sketch the second curve in part (i) it was not sufficient to just offer a drawing without the working; the horizontal point of inflection and asymptote were frequent casualties. Part (ii) was straightforward for most. Many recognised that part (iii) made use of the first function f(β), provided that they used the condition to substitute for α. However, their justification suffered from ignoring the reality condition and using specious arguments, as a consequence. Part (iv) followed a similar trend to part (iii), except using g(β), and only differing in that of those that did apply the reality condition, quite a few overlooked β = 1 as a solution of the cubic inequality, and so their final answer was wrong.
2 The sequence of functions y0,y1,y2,… is defined by y0=1 and, for n⩾1,
yn=(−1)nz1dxndnz,
where z=e−x2.
(i) Show that dxdyn=2xyn−yn+1 for n⩾1.
(ii) Prove by induction that, for n⩾1,
yn+1=2xyn−2nyn−1.
Deduce that, for n⩾1,
yn+12−ynyn+2=2n(yn2−yn−1yn+1)+2yn2.
(iii) Hence show that yn2−yn−1yn+1>0 for n⩾1.
Hint
(i) is obtained by differentiating the defined function yn using the product rule and a little tidying up of z and its differential. The inductive step in the proof of part (ii) can be established by differentiating the assumed case and then removing the three differentials using the result of part (i); the base case is established by obtaining y1=2x and y2=−2+4x2 from the original definition. The deduction in (ii) is most simply obtained by eliminating x between the result for yn+1 just obtained and the similar one for yn+2. Part (iii) is obtained by using the deduction of part (ii) to establish the desired induction, the base case being obtained using the same results used for the base case in part (ii)‘s induction.
Model Solution
Preliminary. We compute the first few yn from the definition. With z=e−x2:
z′=−2xe−x2=−2xz
y1=(−1)1zz′=−z−2xz=2x
z′′=−2z−2xz′=−2z+4x2z=(4x2−2)z
y2=(−1)2zz′′=4x2−2
Part (i)
For n⩾1, write z(n)=dxndnz. By definition, yn=(−1)nzz(n).
Let Sn=yn2−yn−1yn+1. We prove Sn>0 for all n⩾1 by induction.
From (**): Sn+1=2nSn+2yn2.
Base case (n=1):
S1=y12−y0y2=(2x)2−1⋅(4x2−2)=4x2−4x2+2=2>0.✓
Inductive step. Suppose Sk>0 for some k⩾1. Then
Sk+1=2kSk+2yk2.
Since k⩾1, Sk>0, and yk2⩾0:
Sk+1⩾2⋅1⋅Sk>0.
By induction, Sn=yn2−yn−1yn+1>0 for all n⩾1. ■
Examiner Notes
With about 89% attempting this, it was the second most popular question, and with a mean score of nearly 11/20, the second most successful. Part (i) was generally well-handled, and although most scored some marks on the proof by induction in part (ii), candidates often struggled to complete it, many of them because they attempted to use the original definition of the functions, which rarely led to success, rather than employ the result of part (i). Some candidates noticed that the proof by induction in part (ii) was equivalent to proving dy_n/dx = 2ny_{n-1} by induction. This gave them a simpler base case but did not significantly simplify the inductive step. For the deduction in part (ii), it was very common for the first result of part (ii) to be squared, leading to pages of algebra, although they were often then successful. Part (iii) was surprisingly poorly attempted as few candidates realised that a proof by induction (or equivalent) was required.
3 Show that the second-order differential equation
x2y′′+(1−2p)xy′+(p2−q2)y=f(x),
where p and q are constants, can be written in the form
xa(xb(xcy)′)′=f(x),(*)
where a, b and c are constants.
(i) Use (∗) to derive the general solution of the equation
x2y′′+(1−2p)xy′+(p2−q2)y=0
in the different cases that arise according to the values of p and q.
(ii) Use (∗) to derive the general solution of the equation
x2y′′+(1−2p)xy′+p2y=xn
in the different cases that arise according to the values of p and n.
Hint
Differentiating and equating coefficients generates three simultaneous equations, two of which are in b and c only, and can be solved by substituting for one of these variables, then giving a from the third; a=1+p∓q, b=1±2q, c=∓q−p. Part (i) makes use of the form obtained in the stem which can be then integrated twice, with a minor algebraic rearrangement after each integration, with different cases arising as b=1 or not; the solutions are
y=Axp+q+Bxp−q if q=0, and y=Axplnx+Bxp if q=0. Part (ii) proceeds similarly, except that a, b, and c are simplified as q=0. However, two cases arise again and so
y=(n−p)2xn+Axplnx+Bxp if n=p, and y=xn2(lnx)2+Axnlnx+Bxn if n=p.
Model Solution
Showing the equation can be written in the required form
From the first two equations: b=1+2p−2c. Substituting into the third:
c(1+2p−2c+c−1)=c(2p−c)=p2−q2
⟹c2−2pc+p2−q2=0⟹(c−p)2=q2
⟹c=p∓q.
Taking c=p−q (the alternative c=p+q yields the same solutions to the ODE):
a=1+q,b=1+2q,c=p−q.□
Part (i)
With these values of a,b,c, the equation xa(xb(xcy)′)′=0 becomes
x1+q(x1+2q(xp−qy)′)′=0.
Since x1+q=0 for x>0, the first integration gives
x1+2q(xp−qy)′=A1⟹(xp−qy)′=A1x−1−2q.
Case q=0: Integrating again:
xp−qy=−2qA1x−2q+B1⟹y=Axp+q+Bxp−q.
Case q=0: Here a=1+p, b=1, c=−p, so after the first integration (x−py)′=A1x−1. Integrating:
x−py=A1lnx+B1⟹y=Axplnx+Bxp.
y=Axp+q+Bxp−q if q=0,y=Axplnx+Bxp if q=0.
Part (ii)
With q=0: a=1+p, b=2p−1, c=−p. The equation becomes
x1+p(x2p−1(x−py)′)′=xn.
Case n=p: To find the particular integral, try yp=Kxn in the original equation x2y′′+(1−2p)xy′+p2y=xn:
K[n(n−1)+n(1−2p)+p2]xn=xn⟹K(n−p)2=1⟹K=(n−p)21.
(To verify: n(n−1)+n−2np+p2=n2−2np+p2=(n−p)2.)
The general solution is the particular integral plus the homogeneous solution from part (i):
y=(n−p)2xn+Axplnx+Bxp(n=p).
Case n=p: The equation is x2y′′+(1−2p)xy′+p2y=xp. Using the factored form and dividing by x1+p:
(x2p−1(x−py)′)′=x−1.
First integration: x2p−1(x−py)′=lnx+A.
For the particular integral, try yp=Cxp(lnx)2. Then:
yp′=Cpxp−1(lnx)2+2Cxp−1lnx
yp′′=Cp(p−1)xp−2(lnx)2+2C(2p−1)xp−2lnx+2Cxp−2
Substituting into x2y′′+(1−2p)xy′+p2y:
Coefficient of xp(lnx)2: C[p(p−1)+p(1−2p)+p2]=C[p2−p+p−2p2+p2]=0.
Coefficient of xplnx: C[2(2p−1)+2(1−2p)]=C[4p−2+2−4p]=0.
Coefficient of xp: 2C=1, giving C=21.
The general solution is
y=2xp(lnx)2+Axplnx+Bxp(n=p).
Examiner Notes
Only 65% attempted this, and it was the second weakest of the Pure questions with a mean score of about 7/20. It was imperative for candidates to demonstrate high levels of algebraic accuracy to score highly. Most successfully differentiated the initial expression, and equated coefficients but then failed to solve explicitly for a, b and c in terms of p and q (or demonstrate that such a, b and c existed). Candidates without these explicit expressions then often failed to spot one of the main strands of the question, integration of x^n in the two cases n = -1, and n ≠ -1; some considered superfluous other cases. Some candidates fell at the final hurdle having used correct methods but then did not express their solutions in terms of p and q. Also, some were thrown by the two possible sets of solutions for a, b and c, successful candidates realising that these gave the same solutions to the differential equations.
where a>b>0. Show that the equation of the tangent to the hyperbola at P can be written as
bx−aysinθ=abcosθ.
(i) This tangent meets the lines ax=by and ax=−by at S and T, respectively.
How is the mid-point of ST related to P?
(ii) The point Q(asecϕ,btanϕ) also lies on the hyperbola and the tangents to the hyperbola at P and Q are perpendicular. These two tangents intersect at (x,y).
Obtain expressions for x2 and y2 in terms of a, θ and ϕ.
Hence, or otherwise, show that x2+y2=a2−b2.
Hint
The equation of the tangent to the hyperbola at P is found in the usual way, having obtained the gradient through differentiation. In part (i) the points S and T can be found by solving simultaneously the equations for each of the given lines with that for the tangent and their midpoint is found to be P, using a Pythagorean trigonometry result to simplify the common denominators. Solving simultaneous equations using the equations of the two tangents gives x2=[a(sinφ−sinθ)(sinφcosθ−sinθcosφ)]2 and y2=−a2sinθsinφ[(sinφ−sinθ)(cosθ−cosφ)]2, having eliminated b from the latter expression using the condition that the tangents are perpendicular; that same condition and the knowledge that a>b not only justifies that such tangents exist, but also that the denominator of the two results found is non-zero. Adding the two results, expanding brackets in the numerator, and then removing any cos squared terms in favour of sin squared terms leaves an expression which cancels with the denominator, and the resulting simple expression can then be seen to yield the desired result.
Whilst not within the remit of the question posed, an elegant method of obtaining the result of part (ii) is to consider the solution of the hyperbola equation with the equation of a general straight line through a point on the hyperbola and another point. Solving simultaneously for (say) the x-coordinate of the meeting of the curve and line and imposing that the solutions to the quadratic must be coincident for a tangent yields a quadratic equation for the gradients, and as the tangents are perpendicular, the product of those gradients is -1 giving the desired result without recourse to trigonometry.
Model Solution
Stem: Finding the tangent equation
Implicit differentiation of a2x2−b2y2=1 gives a22x−b22ydxdy=0, so dxdy=a2yb2x.
Therefore the numerator is a2(sinϕ−sinθ)2(1+sinθsinϕ), giving
x2+y2=a2(1+sinθsinϕ)=a2(1−a2b2)=a2−b2.□
Examiner Notes
The third most popular question being attempted by just short of three quarters of the candidature, it was however the most successfully attempted with a mean score of not quite 12/20. The stem was usually correctly attempted either using parametric or implicit differentiation. Simultaneous equations were sensibly attempted for part (i), but sometimes they confused the two pairs of equations and as a result got the wrong answer. Some solutions elegantly achieved the correct result having found just one of the coordinates and arguing that as it lay on the tangent, it had to be the point P. Part (ii) was quite often abandoned partway through, giving up after obtaining x^2 and y^2 in the face of the algebra, although some forgot to answer the question at this point even though they had employed simultaneous equations to obtain x and y. Few managed to conclude the question, and it was very rare indeed that the non-zero nature of the denominator (sin φ - sin θ) was justified.
5 The real numbers a1,a2,a3,… are all positive. For each positive integer n, An and Gn are defined by
An=na1+a2+⋯+anandGn=(a1a2…an)1/n.
(i) Show that, for any given positive integer k,
(k+1)(Ak+1−Gk+1)⩾k(Ak−Gk)
if and only if
λkk+1−(k+1)λk+k⩾0,
where λk=(Gkak+1)k+11.
(ii) Let
f(x)=xk+1−(k+1)x+k,
where x>0 and k is a positive integer. Show that f(x)⩾0 and that f(x)=0 if and only if x=1.
(iii) Deduce that:
(a) An⩾Gn for all n;
(b) if An=Gn for some n, then a1=a2=⋯=an.
Hint
As with many inequalities, rather than proving that one expression is greater than or equal to another, it is easier to subtract and produce a single expression that one requires to show is greater than or equal to zero. Substituting for the As, simplifying and dividing by Gk (Gk>0) gets most of the way to obtaining the first result, having demonstrated that GkGk+1=λk en route, and observing the reversibility of the argument throughout. Part (ii) can be simply shown using differentiation to find and justify that there is a single stationary point for f(x), that it is a minimum (zero) and that it occurs for f(x). Part (iii) (a) can be deduced using part (i), observing that the condition for (i) is met by use of part (ii). There are several different but equivalent arguments that can be used for part (iii) (b). Assuming Ak=Gk for some k, then by part (a), and (i), it can be shown that Ak−1=Gk−1, but also that λk−1=1 and so ak=Gk−1. Thus if An=Gn, the argument just employed obtains Ak=Gk and ak=Gk−1 for all k, for k=1 to n. The final step of the argument follows simply.
Model Solution
Part (i)
We express Ak+1 and Gk+1 in terms of Ak, Gk and ak+1.
Substituting into the inequality (k+1)(Ak+1−Gk+1)⩾k(Ak−Gk):
kAk+ak+1−(k+1)Gkλk⩾kAk−kGk
ak+1−(k+1)Gkλk+kGk⩾0
Since ak+1=Gkλkk+1 (from the definition of λk):
Gkλkk+1−(k+1)Gkλk+kGk⩾0
Gk(λkk+1−(k+1)λk+k)⩾0
Since all ai>0, we have Gk>0, so this is equivalent to
λkk+1−(k+1)λk+k⩾0.
Every step is reversible (division by Gk>0 and substitution ak+1=Gkλkk+1 work in both directions), so the two inequalities are equivalent.
Part (ii)
Let f(x)=xk+1−(k+1)x+k for x>0, where k is a positive integer.
f′(x)=(k+1)xk−(k+1)=(k+1)(xk−1)
Setting f′(x)=0: since k+1=0, we need xk=1, giving x=1 (the only real positive root).
For 0<x<1: xk<1, so f′(x)<0 (decreasing).
For x>1: xk>1, so f′(x)>0 (increasing).
Hence x=1 is the unique stationary point on (0,∞) and is a global minimum.
f(1)=1−(k+1)+k=0
Therefore f(x)⩾0 for all x>0, and f(x)=0 if and only if x=1.
Part (iii)(a)
We prove An⩾Gn for all n by induction.
Base case (n=1): A1=a1=G1, so A1⩾G1 holds.
Inductive step: Suppose Ak⩾Gk for some k⩾1. By part (ii), f(λk)⩾0. By part (i):
(k+1)(Ak+1−Gk+1)⩾k(Ak−Gk)⩾0
where the second inequality uses the inductive hypothesis. Since k+1>0, we obtain Ak+1⩾Gk+1.
By induction, An⩾Gn for all positive integers n.
Part (iii)(b)
Suppose An=Gn for some n⩾1. We prove a1=a2=⋯=an.
From parts (i) and (ii), for each 1⩽k⩽n−1:
(k+1)(Ak+1−Gk+1)⩾k(Ak−Gk)
with equality if and only if λk=1.
Since An=Gn, the left side at k=n−1 is zero:
0=(n−1)(An−1−Gn−1)
so An−1=Gn−1 and λn−1=1.
λn−1=1 gives (Gn−1an)1/n=1, hence an=Gn−1.
Since An−1=Gn−1, we have an=An−1.
Repeating: An−1=Gn−1 at k=n−2 gives An−2=Gn−2 and an−1=Gn−2=An−2, and so on.
Continuing down to k=1: at each step, Ak=Gk and ak+1=Gk.
In particular, for k=1: A1=G1=a1 and a2=G1=a1.
Now A2=2a1+a2=a1 and a3=G2=A2=a1.
By induction on the remaining indices, ak=a1 for all k=1,2,…,n.
Therefore a1=a2=⋯=an.
Examiner Notes
A little under half the candidates attempted this, scoring marginally less on average than on question 1. Some candidates used the arithmetic mean/geometric mean inequality which was what the question was proving in part (iii), and so were heavily penalised as their arguments were thus circular. Part (i) was generally well done, with most justifying that their steps were reversible to obtain ‘if and only if’. Marks were sometimes lost when justifying that G_k > 0 was not used to legitimise division by G_k and also that inequalities did not change sign. Part (ii) was well done too, though many candidates did not justify the ‘only if’, although some tried to use part (i) to prove (ii), which could not succeed. Part (iii) expressly required deduction, and only deduction, so those who had learned another proof of the inequality and just copied it out could not be rewarded. Many just used the results of (i) and (ii) without justifying why they could be used and some were imprecise with their induction arguments.
6(i) The distinct points A, Q and C lie on a straight line in the Argand diagram, and represent the distinct complex numbers a, q and c, respectively. Show that c−aq−a is real and hence that (c−a)(q∗−a∗)=(c∗−a∗)(q−a).
Given that aa∗=cc∗=1, show further that
q+acq∗=a+c.
(ii) The distinct points A, B, C and D lie, in anticlockwise order, on the circle of unit radius with centre at the origin (so that, for example, aa∗=1). The lines AC and BD meet at Q. Show that
(ac−bd)q∗=(a+c)−(b+d),
where b and d are complex numbers represented by the points B and D respectively, and show further that
(ac−bd)(q+q∗)=(a−b)(1+cd)+(c−d)(1+ab).
(iii) The lines AB and CD meet at P, which represents the complex number p. Given that p is real, show that p(1+ab)=a+b. Given further that ac−bd=0, show that
p(q+q∗)=2.
Hint
第一问是简单的基础结论,有多种证法。将表达式与其共轭相等(利用实数条件),运用共轭的和、积等性质并代数整理即得(i)的第二个结果。利用单位圆性质替换 a 和 c 的共轭,经代数整理(包括除以可证明非零的 c-a)得到(i)的最终结果。利用 Q 在 AC 上且结合(i)的结果,类似地利用 Q 在 BD 上得到两个方程,线性组合得到(ii)中关于 q* 的方程。类似线性组合也可得 q 的方程,与已有结果相加整理得(ii)的第二个结果。(iii)第一个结果利用(i)的结论,P 在 AB 上且 p 为实数。类似地对 P 在 CD 上得到类似结果。将(ii)的最终结果乘以 p,利用刚得到的两个表达式化简,再除以 ac-bd 完成证明。本题实质上是关于极点与极线的问题。
Model Solution
Part (i)
Since A, Q, C are distinct and collinear, the vector from A to Q is a real scalar multiple of the vector from A to C: there exists t∈R such that q−a=t(c−a), so
c−aq−a=t∈R.
A complex number is real if and only if it equals its own conjugate:
c−aq−a=(c−aq−a)∗=c∗−a∗q∗−a∗.
Cross-multiplying:
(c−a)(q∗−a∗)=(c∗−a∗)(q−a).(*)
Now suppose aa∗=cc∗=1, so a∗=1/a and c∗=1/c. From q=a+t(c−a) with t real, conjugating:
Therefore p(ac−bd)(q+q∗)=2(ac−bd). Since ac−bd=0:
p(q+q∗)=2.(9)
Examiner Notes
最不受欢迎的纯数题,尝试率不足40%,平均分仅略高于5/20。第一问有多种成功解法,但常见错误是将 q 和 c 视为 a 的标量倍数,且 * 运算令部分考生困惑。进入(ii)的考生起步尚可,但利用单位圆条件的考生推导最终方程更为轻松。能坚持到(iii)的考生通常表现不错,但在除以各种因子时偶有未说明非零的扣分。
7 (i) Use De Moivre’s theorem to show that, if sinθ=0, then
2i(cotθ+i)2n+1−(cotθ−i)2n+1=sin2n+1θsin(2n+1)θ,
for any positive integer n.
Deduce that the solutions of the equation
(12n+1)xn−(32n+1)xn−1+⋯+(−1)n=0
are
x=cot2(2n+1mπ)
where m=1,2,…,n.
(ii) Hence show that
∑m=1ncot2(2n+1mπ)=3n(2n−1).
(iii) Given that 0<sinθ<θ<tanθ for 0<θ<21π, show that
cot2θ<θ21<1+cot2θ.
Hence show that
∑m=1∞m21=6π2.
Deduction. Setting the right side of (**) to zero requires sin(2n+1)θ=0, i.e.\ (2n+1)θ=mπ for integer m. For 0<θ<π/2, this gives θm=2n+1mπ with m=1,2,…,n.
At these values, the left side of (**) is zero. Writing x=cot2θ, the left side becomes
(12n+1)xn−(32n+1)xn−1+(52n+1)xn−2−⋯+(−1)n.
The values xm=cot2θm=cot2(2n+1mπ) for m=1,2,…,n are all distinct (since cot2 is strictly decreasing on (0,π/2)). This is a degree-n polynomial with leading coefficient (12n+1)=2n+1=0, so it has at most n roots. We have found n distinct roots, so these are all the solutions.
Part (ii)
The equation from part (i) can be written as
∑s=0n(−1)s(2s+12n+1)xn−s=0,
or equivalently, dividing by the leading coefficient (12n+1)=2n+1:
xn−2n+1(32n+1)xn−1+⋯=0.
By Vieta’s formula, the sum of the roots equals (12n+1)(32n+1). We compute:
8 In this question, you should ignore issues of convergence.
(i) Let
I=∫011+xf(x−1)dx,
where f(x) is a function for which the integral exists.
Show that
I=∑n=1∞∫nn+1y(1+y)f(y)dy
and deduce that, if f(x)=f(x+1) for all x, then
I=∫011+xf(x)dx.
(ii) The fractional part, {x}, of a real number x is defined to be x−⌊x⌋ where ⌊x⌋ is the largest integer less than or equal to x. For example {3.2}=0.2 and {3}=0.
Use the result of part (i) to evaluate
∫011+x{x−1}dxand∫011+x{2x−1}dx.