1 Sketch on the same axes the two curves C1 and C2, given by
C1:C2:xyx2−y2==1,2.
The curves intersect at P and Q. Given that the coordinates of P are (a,b) (which you need not evaluate), write down the coordinates of Q in terms of a and b.
The tangent to C1 through P meets the tangent to C2 through Q at the point M, and the tangent to C2 through P meets the tangent to C1 through Q at N. Show that the coordinates of M are (−b,a) and write down the coordinates of N.
Show that PMQN is a square.
Model Solution
Part (i): Coordinates of Q
The curve C1:xy=1 is symmetric under (x,y)↦(−x,−y) (a hyperbola in quadrants 1 and 3). The curve C2:x2−y2=2 is also symmetric under (x,y)↦(−x,−y) (a hyperbola opening left-right). Since P=(a,b) is an intersection point, Q=(−a,−b) is the other.
Part (ii): Tangent equations
Tangent to C1 at P. Differentiating xy=1 implicitly: y+xy′=0, so y′=−y/x. At P=(a,b): slope =−b/a. Tangent:
y−b=−ab(x−a)⟹bx+ay=2ab=2.(since ab=1)
Tangent to C2 at Q. Differentiating x2−y2=2: 2x−2yy′=0, so y′=x/y. At Q=(−a,−b): slope =(−a)/(−b)=a/b. Tangent:
y+b=ba(x+a)⟹bx−ay=b(−b)−a(a)⋅ab
More carefully: y−(−b)=ba(x−(−a)), so y+b=ba(x+a). Rearranging: bx+ab=ay−ab… let me redo this cleanly.
b(y+b)=a(x+a)⟹by+b2=ax+a2⟹ax−by=b2−a2.
Since a2−b2=2 (as P lies on C2), we get b2−a2=−2, so:
ax−by=−2.(tangent to C2 at Q)
Tangent to C2 at P. At P=(a,b): slope =a/b. Tangent: y−b=ba(x−a). Rearranging: ax−by=a2−b2=2.
ax−by=2.(tangent to C2 at P)
Tangent to C1 at Q. At Q=(−a,−b): slope =−(−b)/(−a)=−b/a. Tangent: y+b=−ab(x+a). Rearranging: bx+ay=−2ab=−2.
bx+ay=−2.(tangent to C1 at Q)
Part (iii): Show M=(−b,a)
M is the intersection of the tangent to C1 at P and the tangent to C2 at Q:
bx+ay=2,ax−by=−2.
Solving: multiply the first by b and the second by a:
b2x+aby=2b,a2x−aby=−2a.
Adding: (a2+b2)x=2b−2a, so x=a2+b22(b−a).
Hmm, this doesn’t immediately give x=−b. Let me use a cleaner method. Multiply the first equation by b and the second by a:
From bx+ay=2: x=b2−ay.
Substitute into ax−by=−2: ba(2−ay)−by=−2, so 2a−a2y−b2y=−2b, giving (a2+b2)y=2a+2b.
Hmm, this also doesn’t simplify directly. The issue is that a2+b2 is not a simple expression. Let me instead verify M=(−b,a) directly.
Check bx+ay=2: b(−b)+a(a)=a2−b2=2. ✓ (since P lies on C2).
A triangle in the Argand plane has vertices A, B, and C represented by the complex numbers p, qα2 and −rα respectively, where p, q and r are positive real numbers. Sketch the triangle ABC.
Three equilateral triangles ABL, BCM and CAN (each lettered clockwise) are erected on sides AB, BC and CA respectively. Show that the complex number representing N is (1−α)p−α2r and find similar expressions for the complex numbers representing L and M.
Show that lines LC, MA and NB all meet at the origin, and that these three line segments have the common length p+q+r.
Model Solution
Part (i): Prove 1+α2=α
Since α=eiπ/3, we have α2=e2iπ/3=cos(2π/3)+isin(2π/3)=−21+23i.
Therefore 1+α2=21+23i=eiπ/3=α. ■
Note: This gives α2=α−1, or equivalently α2−α+1=0. Also α3=−1 and α6=1.
Part (ii): Sketch of triangle ABC
A=p lies on the positive real axis. B=qα2 lies at angle 2π/3 (upper left). C=−rα=rei4π/3 lies at angle 4π/3 (lower left). For p=q=r the triangle is equilateral.
Part (iii): Find L, M, N
For an equilateral triangle with two given vertices U,V and third vertex W such that UVW is labeled clockwise, we use W=V+(U−V)α (a 60∘ counterclockwise rotation of U about V, which produces clockwise labeling in the standard Argand diagram).
Finding N (equilateral triangle CAN, clockwise):
N=A+(C−A)α=p+(−rα−p)α=p−rα2−pα=(1−α)p−rα2.
Using α2=α−1: coefficient of r is −(α−1)=1−α. So:
N=(1−α)p−α2r.■
Finding L (equilateral triangle ABL, clockwise):
L=B+(A−B)α=qα2+(p−qα2)α=qα2+pα−qα3.
Since α3=−1: L=qα2+pα+q=(1−α)p+pα+qα2+q−(1−α)p… let me compute directly.
L=pα+qα2+q=pα+q(α2+1)=pα+qα=(p+q)α.
Wait, α2+1=α, so L=pα+qα=(p+q)α. But this puts L on the ray from the origin at angle π/3. Let me re-derive more carefully.
L=qα2+pα+q. Since α2=α−1:
L=q(α−1)+pα+q=qα−q+pα+q=(p+q)α.
Hmm, this means L lies on the ray OA extended, which seems geometrically suspicious. Let me recheck.
Actually, L=qα2+pα−qα3. Since α3=−1:
L=qα2+pα+q.
Using α2+1=α: q(α2+1)=qα, so L=pα+qα=(p+q)α.
This is correct. L=(p+q)α, which lies at angle π/3.
Finding M (equilateral triangle BCM, clockwise):
M=C+(B−C)α=−rα+(qα2+rα)α=−rα+qα3+rα2.
Since α3=−1 and α2=α−1:
M=−rα−q+r(α−1)=−rα−q+rα−r=−q−r.
So M=−(q+r), lying on the negative real axis.
Verification: We can write L=(p+q)α=(1−α)⋅1−αp+q⋅α… let me express in the standard form.
L=(p+q)α, M=−(q+r), N=(1−α)p−α2r.
Part (iv): Show LC, MA, NB meet at the origin with common length p+q+r
Collinearity with the origin. A point Z lies on the line through the origin if and only if arg(Z) is constant, equivalently Z/Zˉ is real (or Z=0). We show each pair of points is collinear with O.
L and C are collinear with O:L=(p+q)α and C=−rα. Both are real multiples of α, so they lie on the ray at angle π/3 (and its extension). Hence O, L, C are collinear. ✓
M and A are collinear with O:M=−(q+r) and A=p. Both are real, so they lie on the real axis. Hence O, M, A are collinear. ✓
N and B are collinear with O: We need N/B to be real.
BN=qα2(1−α)p−α2r.
Since 1−α=−α2+(1−α+α2)=−α2+0… wait, α2−α+1=0 means 1−α=−α2. So:
N=−α2p−α2r=−α2(p+r).
Therefore BN=qα2−α2(p+r)=−qp+r, which is real (and negative). So N and B lie on the same line through the origin. ✓
Common length. We compute ∣LC∣=∣L−C∣:
L−C=(p+q)α−(−rα)=(p+q+r)α.
So ∣LC∣=(p+q+r)∣α∣=p+q+r.
∣MA∣=∣M−A∣=∣−(q+r)−p∣=p+q+r.
∣NB∣=∣N−B∣=∣−α2(p+r)−qα2∣=∣α2∣⋅∣p+q+r∣=p+q+r.
Therefore all three line segments have the common length p+q+r. ■
Prove algebraically that the line y=x+c intersects the curve y=f(x) if ∣a∣⩾1, but there are values of c for which there are no points of intersection if ∣a∣<1.
Find the equation of the oblique asymptote of the curve y=f(x). Sketch the graph in the two cases (i) a<−1; and (ii) −1<a<−21. (You need not calculate the turning points.)
Model Solution
Part (i): Show y=x+c intersects y=f(x) if ∣a∣≥1
Setting f(x)=x+c:
x2−1x(x−2)(x−a)=x+c.
For x=±1, cross-multiplying:
x(x−2)(x−a)=(x+c)(x2−1).
Expand the left side: x(x2−(a+2)x+2a)=x3−(a+2)x2+2ax.
Expand the right side: x3−x+cx2−c=x3+cx2−x−c.
Setting them equal and cancelling x3:
−(a+2)x2+2ax=cx2−x−c.
Rearranging:
x3−(a+2)x2+2ax−x3−cx2+x+c=0
−(a+2+c)x2+(2a+1)x+c=0.
Wait, let me redo this. The equation is:
x3−(a+2)x2+2ax=x3+cx2−x−c.
−(a+2)x2+2ax−cx2+x+c=0
−(a+2+c)x2+(2a+1)x+c=0.
Hmm, this is a quadratic in x, not a cubic. Let me recheck.
x(x−2)(x−a)=x3−(a+2)x2+2ax.
(x+c)(x2−1)=x3+cx2−x−c.
Subtracting: x3−(a+2)x2+2ax−x3−cx2+x+c=0
−(a+2+c)x2+(2a+1)x+c=0.
So it’s a quadratic: (a+2+c)x2−(2a+1)x−c=0. \qquad (∗)
A quadratic Ax2+Bx+C=0 has a real root that is not ±1 if: (a) its discriminant ≥0, and (b) at least one root is not ±1.
The discriminant is:
Δ=(2a+1)2+4c(a+2+c)=(2a+1)2+4c(a+2)+4c2.
=4a2+4a+1+4ac+8c+4c2
=4a2+4a(1+c)+(1+8c+4c2)
=4a2+4a(1+c)+(2c+1)2+4c.
Hmm, let me try completing the square differently.
Δ=4c2+4(a+2)c+(2a+1)2
Viewing as quadratic in c: Δ=4c2+4(a+2)c+(2a+1)2.
Discriminant of this in c: 16(a+2)2−16(2a+1)2=16[(a+2)2−(2a+1)2]=16[(a+2−2a−1)(a+2+2a+1)]=16[(1−a)(3a+3)]=48(1−a)(a+1).
For Δ≥0 for all c, we need the quadratic in c to be non-negative for all c. Since the leading coefficient is 4>0, this requires the discriminant (in c) ≤0:
48(1−a)(a+1)≤0⟺(1−a)(a+1)≤0⟺a≤−1 or a≥1⟺∣a∣≥1.
So when ∣a∣≥1, Δ≥0 for all c, meaning (∗) always has real roots.
We must also check that the roots are not at x=±1 (where f is undefined). If x=1 is a root of (∗):
(a+2+c)−(2a+1)−c=0⟹a+2+c−2a−1−c=0⟹1−a=0⟹a=1.
When a=1 and x=1 is a root, the quadratic becomes (3+c)x2−3x−c=0 with x=1 a root: 3+c−3−c=0, confirmed. The other root is x=−c/(3+c) by Vieta’s (product of roots =−c/(3+c), one root is 1, so other is −c/(3+c)). This root equals −1 when −c=−(3+c), i.e. 3=0, impossible. So the other root is valid.
If x=−1 is a root of (∗):
(a+2+c)+(2a+1)−c=0⟹3a+3=0⟹a=−1.
When a=−1 and x=−1 is a root, the quadratic becomes (1+c)x2+x−c=0 with x=−1: 1+c−1−c=0, confirmed. The other root is x=c/(1+c) by Vieta’s. This equals 1 when c=1+c, impossible. So the other root is valid.
In both edge cases, at least one valid intersection exists. Therefore for ∣a∣≥1 and any c, the line y=x+c intersects y=f(x). ■
Part (ii): No intersection for some c when ∣a∣<1
When ∣a∣<1, the discriminant Δ (as a quadratic in c) can be negative for some c. Specifically, Δ<0 when c lies between the two roots of Δ=0 (viewed as quadratic in c). For such c, the quadratic (∗) has no real roots, so there is no intersection.
For example, when a=0: Δ=4c2+8c+1. Setting Δ=0: c=8−8±64−16=8−8±43=2−2±3. For c in the interval (2−2−3,2−2+3), Δ<0 and there are no points of intersection. ■
Part (iii): Oblique asymptote
Perform polynomial long division of x(x−2)(x−a)=x3−(a+2)x2+2ax by x2−1:
x2−1x3−(a+2)x2+2ax=x−(a+2)+x2−1(2a+3)x−(a+2).
Check: x(x2−1)=x3−x. Subtract: −(a+2)x2+(2a+1)x. Then −(a+2)(x2−1)=−(a+2)x2+(a+2). Subtract: (2a+1)x−(a+2)=(2a+3)x−(a+2).
As x→±∞, the remainder tends to 0, so the oblique asymptote is:
y=x−(a+2).
Part (iv): Sketches
Both cases share: vertical asymptotes at x=±1; oblique asymptote y=x−(a+2); roots of numerator at x=0, x=2, x=a.
(i) a<−1:
Roots in order: a<−1<0<1<2. The numerator x(x−2)(x−a) changes sign at each root.
Sign of f(x) in each interval (tracking numerator × denominator):
x<a: num <0, den >0⇒f<0.
a<x<−1: num >0, den >0⇒f>0. As x→−1−: f→+∞.
−1<x<0: num >0, den <0⇒f<0. As x→−1+: f→−∞.
0<x<1: num <0, den <0⇒f>0. As x→1−: f→+∞.
1<x<2: num >0, den >0⇒f>0. As x→1+: f→+∞… wait.
Let me recheck. Numerator N(x)=x(x−2)(x−a) with a<−1.
N(−2)=(−2)(−4)(−2−a). Since a<−1, −2−a>−2−(−1)=−1, so if a<−2, −2−a>0 and N(−2)=(−2)(−4)(positive)>0. If a=−2, N(−2)=0. If −2<a<−1, −2−a<0 and N(−2)<0.
Hmm, this depends on whether a<−2 or −2<a<−1. The problem says a<−1, so both sub-cases are possible. Let me handle the general case by analyzing sign changes.
The roots of N(x) in order are a,0,2 (since a<−1<0<2). N(x) has leading coefficient +1, so N(x)→+∞ as x→+∞. The sign pattern of N:
x<a: −
a<x<0: +
0<x<2: −
x>2: +
The sign of D(x)=x2−1:
∣x∣>1: +
∣x∣<1: −
Sign of f=N/D:
x<a: −/+=−.
a<x<−1: +/+=+. f→+∞ as x→−1−.
−1<x<0: +/−=−. f→−∞ as x→−1+.
0<x<1: −/−=+. f→+∞ as x→1−.
1<x<2: +/+=+. f→+∞ as x→1+… that would mean f goes to +∞ from both sides of x=1, which requires the numerator to be positive near x=1. N(1)=1⋅(−1)⋅(1−a). Since a<−1, 1−a>0, so N(1)=−(1−a)<0. So near x=1, N<0 and D changes sign. x→1−: D<0, f=N/D=(−)/(−)=+, so f→+∞. x→1+: D>0, f=(−)/(+)=−, so f→−∞.
Corrected sign of f:
x<a: −.
a<x<−1: +. f→+∞ as x→−1−.
−1<x<0: −. f→−∞ as x→−1+.
0<x<1: +. f→+∞ as x→1−.
1<x<2: −. f→−∞ as x→1+.
x>2: +.
The curve has three branches between the asymptotes: (a,−1), (−1,1), and (1,∞). The branch in (−1,1) passes through the origin and goes from −∞ to +∞. The branch in (1,2) goes from −∞, crosses zero at x=2, and approaches the asymptote y=x−(a+2) from below for large x.
a<x<0: +/−=−. f crosses zero at x=a (going from + to −).
0<x<1: −/−=+. f crosses zero at x=0.
1<x<2: −/+=−. f→−∞ as x→1+.
x>2: +/+=+. f crosses zero at x=2.
The branch in (−1,1) now has two sign changes: it comes from +∞ at x=−1+, crosses zero at x=a (going negative), crosses zero again at x=0 (going positive), and heads to +∞ as x→1−. This creates a “dip” below the axis between x=a and x=0.
5 Given two non-zero vectors a=(a1a2) and b=(b1b2) we define Δ(a,b) by Δ(a,b)=a1b2−a2b1.
Let A, B and C be points with position vectors a, b and c, respectively, no two of which are parallel. Let P, Q and R be points with position vectors p, q and r, respectively, none of which are parallel.
(i) Show that there exists a 2×2 matrix M such that P and Q are the images of A and B under the transformation represented by M.
(ii) Show that Δ(a,b)c+Δ(c,a)b+Δ(b,c)a=0.
Hence, or otherwise, prove that a necessary and sufficient condition for the points P, Q, and R to be the images of points A, B and C under the transformation represented by some 2×2 matrix M is that
Δ(a,b):Δ(b,c):Δ(c,a)=Δ(p,q):Δ(q,r):Δ(r,p).
Model Solution
Part (i)
Since a and b are non-parallel, they are linearly independent and form a basis for R2. The matrix [ab] (with a and b as columns) is therefore invertible, with
Explain why this equation always has a non-negative root, and verify that u=9 is a root in the case p=−1,q=−6,r=15.
Hence, or otherwise, express
y4−8y3+23y2−34y+39
as a product of two quadratic factors.
Model Solution
Part (i): Express p, q, r in terms of a, b, c
Expand (x2−ax+b)(x2+ax+c):
=x4+ax3+cx2−ax3−a2x2−acx+bx2+abx+bc
=x4+(b+c−a2)x2+a(b−c)x+bc.
Matching coefficients with x4+px2+qx+r:
p=b+c−a2,q=a(b−c),r=bc.(i)
Part (ii): Show a2 is a root of u3+2pu2+(p2−4r)u−q2=0
From (i): b+c=p+a2 and b−c=q/a (for a=0).
Therefore b=2p+a2+q/a and c=2p+a2−q/a.
From r=bc:
r=4(p+a2)2−(q/a)2=4(p+a2)2−q2/a2.
So 4r=(p+a2)2−q2/a2, giving:
(p+a2)2−4r=a2q2.
Multiply both sides by a2:
a2(p+a2)2−4ra2=q2.
Expand: a2(p2+2pa2+a4)−4ra2=q2, so:
a6+2pa4+p2a2−4ra2−q2=0.
Setting u=a2:
u3+2pu2+(p2−4r)u−q2=0.■
Part (iii): Non-negative root
The product of the roots of u3+2pu2+(p2−4r)u−q2=0 equals q2 (by Vieta’s, the product is −(−q2)/1=q2≥0).
If all three roots were negative, their product would be negative, contradicting q2≥0. Therefore at least one root is non-negative. (When q=0, u=0 is a root.) ■
Part (iv): Verify u=9 for p=−1, q=−6, r=15
93+2(−1)(81)+(1−60)(9)−36=729−162−531−36=0.✓
Part (v): Factor y4−8y3+23y2−34y+39
First, eliminate the cubic term with y=x+2 (since −8/4=−2):
7 Given that
e=1+1!1+2!1+3!1+⋯+r!1+⋯,
use the binomial theorem to show that
(1+n1)n<e
for any positive integer n.
The product P(n) is defined, for any positive integer n, by
P(n)=23⋅45⋅89⋅…⋅2n2n+1.
Use the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality,
na1+a2+⋯+an⩾(a1⋅a2⋅…⋅an)n1,
to show that P(n)<e for all n.
Explain briefly why P(n) tends to a limit as n→∞. Show that this limit, L, satisfies 2<L⩽e.
Raising both sides to the power n (valid since both sides are positive):
P(n)<(1+n1−2−n)n.
Since 1−2−n<1, we have n1−2−n<n1, so
(1+n1−2−n)n<(1+n1)n<e,
where the last step uses Part 1. Therefore P(n)<e for all n.
Part 3: Convergence and bounds for L
P(n) is strictly increasing because each factor ak=1+2k1>1, so P(n+1)=P(n)⋅an+1>P(n).
P(n) is bounded above by e (Part 2). A bounded monotone increasing sequence converges, so P(n)→L for some limit L.
Since P(n) is increasing and P(2)=23⋅45=815>2, we have P(n)>2 for all n⩾2, giving L⩾2. In fact L>2: if L=2 then P(n)⩽2 for all n, but P(2)=815>2, a contradiction.
8 The sequence an is defined by a0=1, a1=1, and
an=an−21+an−12(n⩾2).
Prove by induction that
an=3an−1−an−2(n⩾2).
Hence show that
an=5α2n−1+α−(2n−1)(n⩾1),
where α=21+5.
Model Solution
Part 1: Prove by induction that an=3an−1−an−2 for n⩾2
We first establish a helper identity.
Lemma.anan−2−an−12=1 for all n⩾2.
Proof. From the definition, anan−2=1+an−12, so anan−2−an−12=1. □
We also record the key algebraic identity we need:
an2−3anan−1+an−12+1=0for all n⩾1.(†)
We prove (†) by induction.
Base case (n=1).a12−3a1a0+a02+1=1−3+1+1=0. ✓
Inductive step. Suppose (†) holds for some n⩾1. From the lemma, an+1=an−11+an2, so