1 Let
In=∫−∞∞(x2+2ax+b)n1dx,
where a and b are constants with b>a2, and n is a positive integer.
(i) By using the substitution x+a=b−a2tanu , or otherwise, show that
I1=b−a2π.
(ii) Show that 2n(b−a2)In+1=(2n−1)In .
(iii) Hence prove by induction that
In=22n−2(b−a2)n−21π(n−12n−2).
Hint
Part (i) is most simply dealt with by the suggested method, change of variable, and it is worth completing the square in the denominator to simplify the algebra leading to a trivial integral. Part (ii) can either be attempted immediately using integration by parts, starting from In and obtaining ∫−∞∞(x2+2ax+b)n+12nx(x+a)dx and then writing the numerator as 2n(x2+2ax+b)−na(2x+2a)−2n(b−a2). Alternatively, use of the same substitution in In+1 as in part (i) leads to the need to integrate cos2nu, which in turn can be written as cos2n−2u(1−sin2u)=cos2n−2u−cos2n−2usinu⋅sinu, with the second term being susceptible to integration by parts. Part (iii) follows from the previous parts by induction using part (ii) to achieve the inductive step and (i) the base case.
Model Solution
Part (i)
Complete the square in the denominator:
x2+2ax+b=(x+a)2+(b−a2)
Let x+a=b−a2tanu, so dx=b−a2sec2udu. As x→∞, u→2π; as x→−∞, u→−2π.
2 The distinct points P(ap2,2ap), Q(aq2,2aq) and R(ar2,2ar) lie on the parabola y2=4ax, where a>0. The points are such that the normal to the parabola at Q and the normal to the parabola at R both pass through P.
(i) Show that q2+qp+2=0 .
(ii) Show that QR passes through a certain point that is independent of the choice of P.
(iii) Let T be the point of intersection of OP and QR, where O is the coordinate origin. Show that T lies on a line that is independent of the choice of P.
Show further that the distance from the x-axis to T is less than 2a .
Hint
Working parametrically with x=at2,y=2at gives a normal as tx+y=at3+2at and imposing that this passes through (ap2,2ap) yields t2+tp+2=0 () which has roots q and r, the former giving (i). As a consequence, r+q=−p and rq=2, so that QR, 2x−(r+q)y+2aqr=0, simplifies to 2x+py+4a=0, and thus passes through (−2a,0) for (ii). T can be shown to be (−a,p−2a), which, of course, lies on x=−a, and as () had two real distinct roots, q and r, p2−8>0, which yields ∣p−2a∣<2a.
Model Solution
Part (i)
The parabola is y2=4ax. Differentiating implicitly: 2ydxdy=4a, so dxdy=y2a.
At the point (at2,2at) on the parabola, the slope of the tangent is 2at2a=t1, so the slope of the normal is −t.
The normal at (at2,2at) is:
y−2at=−t(x−at2)
For the normal at Q(aq2,2aq) to pass through P(ap2,2ap), substitute x=ap2, y=2ap:
2ap−2aq=−q(ap2−aq2)
2a(p−q)=−qa(p−q)(p+q)
Since P and Q are distinct points, p=q, so we may divide both sides by a(p−q):
2=−q(p+q)
q2+qp+2=0
Part (ii)
Since both q and r satisfy t2+pt+2=0, by Vieta’s formulas:
q+r=−p,qr=2
The line QR passes through Q(aq2,2aq) and R(ar2,2ar). Its slope is:
aq2−ar22aq−2ar=a(q−r)(q+r)2a(q−r)=q+r2
The equation of QR is:
y−2aq=q+r2(x−aq2)
Substituting q+r=−p and qr=2:
y−2aq=−p2(x−aq2)
−p(y−2aq)=2(x−aq2)
−py+2apq=2x−2aq2
2x+py=2aq2+2apq=2aq(q+p)
From q2+pq+2=0, we get q(q+p)=−2, so:
2x+py=2a(−2)=−4a
2x+py+4a=0
This line passes through (−2a,0) regardless of P, since 2(−2a)+p(0)+4a=0.
Part (iii)
The line OP passes through O(0,0) and P(ap2,2ap), so its equation is y=p2x, i.e., py=2x.
To find the intersection T with QR: 2x+py+4a=0. Substitute 2x=py:
py+py+4a=0⟹2py=−4a⟹y=p−2a
Then x=2py=2p⋅(−2a/p)=−a.
So T=(−a,p−2a), which lies on the line x=−a. This line is independent of P.
Showing the distance bound: The equation t2+pt+2=0 must have two distinct real roots q and r (since Q and R are distinct points). The discriminant must be positive:
p2−8>0⟹p2>8⟹∣p∣>22
The distance from T to the x-axis is:
p−2a=∣p∣2a
Since ∣p∣>22:
∣p∣2a<222a=2a
Therefore the distance from T to the x-axis is less than 2a.
3 (i) Given that
∫(x+1)2x3−2exdx=Q(x)P(x)ex+constant,
where P(x) and Q(x) are polynomials, show that Q(x) has a factor of x+1.
Show also that the degree of P(x) is exactly one more than the degree of Q(x), and find P(x) in the case Q(x)=x+1.
(ii) Show that there are no polynomials P(x) and Q(x) such that
∫x+11exdx=Q(x)P(x)ex+constant.
You need consider only the case when P(x) and Q(x) have no common factors.
Hint
Differentiating, multiplying by denominators and dividing by the exponential function, gives Q(P+P′)−PQ′2=(x3−2)Q2 which, invoking the factor theorem, gives the first required result. Denoting the degree of P by p and that of Q by q in this expression yields p+q+2=2q+3 and hence the desired result in (i). Furthermore, in the given case, substitution in the same result and postulating P(x)=ax2+bx+c yields consistent equations for a,b and c and thus P(x)=x2−2x.
For part (ii), commencing as in part (i) demonstrates again that Q has a factor (x+1) as Q(P+P′)−PQ′=Q2. Supposing Q(x)=(x+1)nS(x), where n≥2 and S(−1)=0, with P(−1)=0 and substituting in the expression already derived leads to a contradiction.
Model Solution
Part (i)
We start by noting that if Q(x)P(x)ex differentiates to (x+1)2x3−2ex, then by the product rule:
To show Q has a factor of x+1: substitute x=−1 into the equation (x3−2)Q2=Q2(P+P′)−QQ′P (which follows from cross-multiplying the original identity differently — multiply both sides by Q2(x+1)2 and divide by (x+1)2):
(x3−2)Q=Q(P+P′)−Q′P(...)
(This comes from dividing both sides of (x3−2)Q2=Q2(P+P′)−QQ′P by Q, noting Q≡0.)
At x=−1:
(−1−2)Q(−1)=Q(−1)[P(−1)+P′(−1)]−Q′(−1)P(−1)
−3Q(−1)=Q(−1)[P(−1)+P′(−1)]−Q′(−1)P(−1)
This is a relation between values at x=−1 and does not immediately force Q(−1)=0. Instead, we use equation (**) more carefully.
From (x3−2)Q=Q(P+P′)−Q′P, rearrange:
Q[(x3−2)−P−P′]=−Q′P(...*)
If Q(−1)=0, then at x=−1:
Q(−1)[−3−P(−1)−P′(−1)]=−Q′(−1)P(−1)
This is just a constraint on the values — it does not lead to a contradiction on its own. However, we can establish the result by a different route. Differentiate the given identity directly.
Suppose Q(x)P(x)ex has derivative (x+1)2x3−2ex. Write Q(x)=(x+1)nS(x) where S(−1)=0 and n≥0. We want to show n≥1.
From the equation (x3−2)Q=Q(P+P′)−Q′P:
The left side has a zero of order n at x=−1 (from the factor Q).
On the right side:
Q(P+P′) has a zero of order ≥n at x=−1.
Q′P: since Q=(x+1)nS, we have Q′=n(x+1)n−1S+(x+1)nS′, so Q′ has a zero of order n−1 at x=−1 (assuming n≥1; if n=0, Q′=S′ has no guaranteed zero).
If n=0: the left side is (x3−2)S(x), which at x=−1 gives −3S(−1)=0. The right side is S(P+P′)−S′P. At x=−1: S(−1)[P(−1)+P′(−1)]−S′(−1)P(−1). Setting equal: −3S(−1)=S(−1)[P(−1)+P′(−1)]−S′(−1)P(−1). This can be satisfied, so we need a different argument.
We use the degree argument instead. From (x3−2)Q=Q(P+P′)−Q′P, let degP=p, degQ=q. The left side has degree q+3. On the right side, Q(P+P′) has degree q+p (the leading terms of P and P′ do not cancel since they have different degrees), and Q′P has degree (q−1)+p=q+p−1. So the right side has degree q+p.
Therefore q+3=q+p, giving p=3.
Now, from equation (*), cross-multiplying the original identity Q2PQ+P′Q−PQ′=(x+1)2x3−2:
(PQ+P′Q−PQ′)(x+1)2=(x3−2)Q2
At x=−1: 0=(−3)Q(−1)2, so Q(−1)=0.
This means Q(−1)=0, so (x+1) divides Q(x).
Showing degP=degQ+1: From the degree analysis above, p=3 regardless of q. Wait — let me redo this more carefully from the cross-multiplied form.
This is a contradiction, so let me re-examine. The issue is that the equation (**) came from dividing by Q, but I need to use the original cross-multiplied form.
From (PQ+P′Q−PQ′)(x+1)2=(x3−2)Q2 with Q=x+1:
LHS: [(x+1)P+(x+1)P′−P](x+1)2
=[xP+P+xP′+P′−P](x+1)2
=[xP+xP′+P′](x+1)2
=[x(P+P′)+P′](x+1)2
With P=ax2+bx+c:
P+P′=ax2+(2a+b)x+(b+c)
x(P+P′)=ax3+(2a+b)x2+(b+c)x
P′=2ax+b
x(P+P′)+P′=ax3+(2a+b)x2+(b+c+2a)x+b
Multiply by (x+1)2=x2+2x+1:
[ax3+(2a+b)x2+(2a+b+c)x+b](x2+2x+1)
This is getting unwieldy. Let me use a cleaner approach.
Cleaner approach for finding P: Since dxd[QPex]=(x+1)2x3−2ex with Q=x+1, we need:
4 (i) By considering 1+xr1−1+xr+11 for ∣x∣=1, simplify
∑r=1N(1+xr)(1+xr+1)xr.
Show that, for ∣x∣<1,
∑r=1∞(1+xr)(1+xr+1)xr=1−x2x.
(ii) Deduce that
∑r=1∞sech(ry)sech((r+1)y)=2e−ycosech(2y)
for y>0.
Hence simplify
∑r=−∞∞sech(ry)sech((r+1)y),
for y>0.
Hint
The considered expression equates to (1+xr)(1+xr+1)(x−1)xr and so, by the method of differences, ∑r=1N(1+xr)(1+xr+1)xr=(x−1)1[1+x1−1+xN+11], and letting N→∞, the desired result is obtained. Writing sech(ry) as 1+e−2ry2e−ry and similarly sech((r+1)y), the result of part (i) with x=e−2y can be used to obtain the result. Care needs to be taken to write ∑r=−∞∞sech(ry)sech((r+1)y) as 2[∑r=1∞sech(ry)sech((r+1)y)+sech y] which with the previous deduction of (ii) can be simplified to 2 cosech y.
5 (i) By considering the binomial expansion of (1+x)2m+1, prove that
(m2m+1)<22m,
for any positive integer m.
(ii) For any positive integers r and s with r<s, Pr,s is defined as follows: Pr,s is the product of all the prime numbers greater than r and less than or equal to s, if there are any such primes numbers; if there are no such primes numbers, then Pr,s=1.
For example, P3,7=35, P7,10=1 and P14,18=17.
Show that, for any positive integer m, Pm+1,2m+1 divides (m2m+1), and deduce that
Pm+1,2m+1<22m.
(iii) Show that, if P1,k<4k for k=2,3,…,2m, then P1,2m+1<42m+1.
(iv) Prove that P1,n<4n for n⩾2.
Hint
The binomial expansion, evaluated for x=1, appreciating that terms are symmetrical contains two terms equal to the LHS of the inequality, and so truncating to them gives double the required result in (i). Appreciating that (m+1)!m!(2m+1)! is an integer and that if m+1<p≤2m+1, with p a prime, implies p divides the numerator and not the denominator of this expression and hence divides the integer then can be extended for all such primes yielding the result, with the deduction following from (i). For (iii), it can be shown that m+1≤2m and writing P1,2m+1 as P1,m+1Pm+1,2m+1, combining the given result and (ii), the desired result is obtained. Part (iv) is obtained by use of strong induction with the supposition, P1,m<4m for all m≤k for some particular k≥2, and considering the cases k even and odd separately and making use of (iii).
Model Solution
Part (i)
Consider the binomial expansion of (1+x)2m+1:
(1+x)2m+1=∑k=02m+1(k2m+1)xk.
Setting x=1:
22m+1=∑k=02m+1(k2m+1).
The binomial coefficients satisfy the symmetry (k2m+1)=(2m+1−k2m+1). We pair the terms: the k-th term with the (2m+1−k)-th term. Since 2m+1 is odd, every term has a distinct partner, and there are m+1 pairs:
22m+1=2[(02m+1)+(12m+1)+⋯+(m2m+1)].
Since all binomial coefficients are strictly positive:
(02m+1)+(12m+1)+⋯+(m2m+1)>(m2m+1).
Therefore:
22m+1=2[(02m+1)+⋯+(m2m+1)]>2(m2m+1),
which gives (m2m+1)<22m. (proved)
Part (ii)
Recall that (m2m+1)=m!(m+1)!(2m+1)!.
Let p be any prime with m+1<p≤2m+1. We show that p∣(m2m+1) by counting the multiplicity of p in the numerator and denominator.
Since m+1<p≤2m+1 and 2p>2(m+1)>2m+1, the number p appears exactly once in 1,2,…,2m+1. So p has multiplicity exactly 1 in (2m+1)!.
Since p>m+1>m, the prime p does not divide any of 1,2,…,m, so p has multiplicity 0 in m!.
Since p>m+1, the prime p does not divide any of 1,2,…,m+1, so p has multiplicity 0 in (m+1)!.
Therefore p has multiplicity 1−0−0=1 in (m2m+1), so p∣(m2m+1).
Since this holds for every prime p with m+1<p≤2m+1, and these primes are distinct, their product Pm+1,2m+1 divides (m2m+1).
From part (i), (m2m+1)<22m. Since Pm+1,2m+1 is a positive divisor of (m2m+1):
Pm+1,2m+1≤(m2m+1)<22m.(deduced)
Part (iii)
We decompose the product of all primes up to 2m+1:
P1,2m+1=P1,m+1⋅Pm+1,2m+1.
This is valid because every prime ≤2m+1 is either ≤m+1 or lies in (m+1,2m+1], and the two sets are disjoint.
Since m≥1, we have m+1≥2 and m+1≤2m, so m+1 lies in the range {2,3,…,2m}. By hypothesis:
We prove P1,n<4n for all n≥2 by strong induction.
Base cases.
P1,2=2<16=42.
P1,3=2×3=6<64=43.
Inductive step. Suppose P1,k<4k for all k with 2≤k≤n, where n≥3. We show P1,n+1<4n+1.
Case 1: n+1 is even. Write n+1=2m with m≥2 (since n+1≥4).
Since P1,s is the product of primes ≤s, increasing the upper bound from 2m−1 to 2m either multiplies by a new prime (if 2m is prime) or leaves the product unchanged (if 2m is composite). In either case:
P1,2m≤P1,2m−1.
Since 2m−1≥3≥2, the inductive hypothesis gives P1,2m−1<42m−1. Therefore:
P1,2m≤P1,2m−1<42m−1<42m.
Case 2: n+1 is odd. Write n+1=2m+1 with m≥2 (since n+1≥5).
We decompose as in part (iii):
P1,2m+1=P1,m+1⋅Pm+1,2m+1.
Since m≥2, we have 3≤m+1≤2m≤n, so m+1 lies in the range {2,3,…,n}. By the inductive hypothesis:
P1,m+1<4m+1.
By part (ii):
Pm+1,2m+1<22m=4m.
Therefore:
P1,2m+1<4m+1⋅4m=42m+1.
In both cases, P1,n+1<4n+1. By strong induction, P1,n<4n for all n≥2. (proved)
6 Show, by finding R and γ, that Asinhx+Bcoshx can be written in the form Rcosh(x+γ) if B>A>0. Determine the corresponding forms in the other cases that arise, for A>0, according to the value of B.
Two curves have equations y=sechx and y=atanhx+b, where a>0.
(i) In the case b>a, show that if the curves intersect then the x-coordinates of the points of intersection can be written in the form
±arcosh(b2−a21)−artanhba.
(ii) Find the corresponding result in the case a>b>0.
(iii) Find necessary and sufficient conditions on a and b for the curves to intersect at two distinct points.
(iv) Find necessary and sufficient conditions on a and b for the curves to touch and, given that they touch, express the y-coordinate of the point of contact in terms of a.
Hint
Using Rcosh(x+γ)=R(coshxcoshγ+sinhxsinhγ), R=B2−A2 and γ=tanh−1BA if B>A>0. If B=A, then Asinhx+Bcoshx=Aex. If −A<B<A, the expression can be written as Rsinh(x+γ) with R=A2−B2 and γ=tanh−1AB. If B=−A, then Asinhx+Bcoshx=−Ae−x, and if B<−A, the expression can be written as Rcosh(x+γ) with R=−B2−A2 and γ=tanh−1BA.
For part (i), solving simultaneously gives asinhx+bcoshx=1, which gives the desired solutions using the first result of the question.
Similarly for part (ii) using the appropriate result, x=sinh−1(a2−b21)−tanh−1ab.
For (iii), we require that the conditions for (i) give two solutions, i.e. that b>a and (b2−a21)>1, and so a<b<a2+1, and vice versa, if this applies there are indeed two solutions.
For (iv), we require case (i) to give coincident solutions, i.e. b=a2+1 and hence x=−tanh−1a2+1a, and so y=a2+11. The reverse argument also applies.
Model Solution
Preamble: Combining Asinhx+Bcoshx
We expand Rcosh(x+γ)=Rcoshxcoshγ+Rsinhxsinhγ and match coefficients:
A=Rsinhγ,B=Rcoshγ.
Dividing: tanhγ=BA, so γ=artanhBA (valid when ∣A/B∣<1).
Using cosh2γ−sinh2γ=1:
R2B2−R2A2=1⟹R2=B2−A2.
Case 1: B>A>0. Then B2−A2>0, so R=B2−A2>0 and γ=artanhBA.
Asinhx+Bcoshx=B2−A2cosh(x+artanhBA).
Case 2: B=A>0. Then Asinhx+Acoshx=A(sinhx+coshx)=Aex.
Case 3: 0<B<A (i.e., −A<B<A with B>0). We try Rsinh(x+γ)=Rsinhxcoshγ+Rcoshxsinhγ, matching A=Rcoshγ and B=Rsinhγ. Then tanhγ=B/A, so γ=artanhAB, and R2=A2−B2>0, giving R=A2−B2.
Asinhx+Bcoshx=A2−B2sinh(x+artanhAB).
Case 4: B=−A<0. Then Asinhx−Acoshx=A(sinhx−coshx)=−Ae−x.
Case 5: B<−A<0. We return to the cosh form. R2=B2−A2>0, but Rcoshγ=B<0, so we take R=−B2−A2<0. Then γ=artanhBA (note ∣A/B∣<1 since ∣B∣>A).
Asinhx+Bcoshx=−B2−A2cosh(x+artanhBA).
Part (i)
Setting sechx=atanhx+b and multiplying both sides by coshx:
1=asinhx+bcoshx.
In the case b>a>0, we apply Case 1 with A=a, B=b:
b2−a2cosh(x+artanhba)=1
cosh(x+artanhba)=b2−a21.
For this to have a solution, we need b2−a21≥1, i.e., b2−a2≤1.
Since cosh is an even function, coshu=α gives u=±arcoshα for α≥1. Therefore:
x+artanhba=±arcosh(b2−a21)
x=±arcosh(b2−a21)−artanhba.(shown)
Part (ii)
Again the intersection condition is asinhx+bcoshx=1. In the case a>b>0, we apply Case 3 with A=a, B=b:
a2−b2sinh(x+artanhab)=1
sinh(x+artanhab)=a2−b21.
Since sinh is a strictly increasing function with range (−∞,∞), the equation sinhu=α has the unique solution u=arsinhα for any real α. Therefore:
x+artanhab=arsinh(a2−b21)
x=arsinh(a2−b21)−artanhab.(shown)
Part (iii)
From part (i), when b>a, the intersection x-coordinates satisfy cosh(x+γ)=b2−a21. This equation has two distinct solutions (the ± branch) if and only if b2−a21>1, i.e., b2−a2<1, i.e., b<a2+1.
Combining with b>a: the curves intersect at two distinct points when a<b<a2+1.
From part (ii), when a>b>0, the equation sinh(x+γ)=a2−b21 has exactly one solution (since sinh is strictly monotone), so there is only one intersection point.
Therefore the necessary and sufficient condition for two distinct intersection points is:
a<b<a2+1.(shown)
Part (iv)
“Touching” means the curves meet at exactly one point with a common tangent, i.e., both the function values and derivatives agree.
From y=sechx and y=atanhx+b:
y′=−sechxtanhxandy′=asech2x.
At a touching point, −sechxtanhx=asech2x. Since sechx>0, divide by sechx:
−tanhx=asechx
−coshxsinhx=coshxa
sinhx=−a.
Substituting into the intersection condition asinhx+bcoshx=1:
a(−a)+bcoshx=1⟹bcoshx=1+a2⟹coshx=b1+a2.
Using cosh2x−sinh2x=1:
(b1+a2)2−a2=1
b2(1+a2)2=1+a2
b21+a2=1
b2=1+a2
b=a2+1(since b>0).
Conversely, if b=a2+1, then from part (i) (since b=a2+1>a), the cosh equation becomes cosh(x+γ)=b2−a21=11=1, which has the unique solution x+γ=0, confirming exactly one intersection point.
The necessary and sufficient condition for the curves to touch is:
b=a2+1.(shown)
y-coordinate of the point of contact. At the touching point, coshx=b1+a2=a2+11+a2=a2+1, so:
7 Let ω=e2πi/n, where n is a positive integer. Show that, for any complex number z,
(z−1)(z−ω)⋯(z−ωn−1)=zn−1.
The points X0,X1,…,Xn−1 lie on a circle with centre O and radius 1, and are the vertices of a regular polygon.
(i) The point P is equidistant from X0 and X1. Show that, if n is even,
∣PX0∣×∣PX1∣×⋯×∣PXn−1∣=∣OP∣n+1,
where ∣PXk∣ denotes the distance from P to Xk.
Give the corresponding result when n is odd. (There are two cases to consider.)
(ii) Show that
∣X0X1∣×∣X0X2∣×⋯×∣X0Xn−1∣=n.
Hint
Considering (ωr)n establishes by the factor theorem that each factor on the LHS is a factor of the RHS, and comparing coefficients of zn between the two sides establishes that no numerical factor is required.
For part (i), representing Xr by ωr, then there are two cases to consider, P will be represented either by renπi, or re(nπ+π)i. The product of moduli is the moduli of the product of factors, and the product of the factors can be simplified using the stem and choosing z in turn as the representations of P to give the required result in both cases.
Proceeding similarly for n odd, the first case yields ∣OP∣n+1, and the second, ∣OP∣n−1, if ∣OP∣≥1, and 1−∣OP∣n if ∣OP∣<1.
Using the same representations for the Xr in part (ii), and the same technique with the moduli, the stem can be divided by (z−1) to give (z−ω)(z−ω2)…(z−ωn−1)=zn−1+zn−2+⋯+1 which then gives the desired result when z=1.
Model Solution
Proof of the stem result.
The equation zn=1 has exactly n roots: z=1,ω,ω2,…,ωn−1, where ω=e2πi/n.
To verify these are distinct: if ωj=ωk for 0≤j,k≤n−1, then e2πi(j−k)/n=1, requiring n∣(j−k). Since ∣j−k∣<n, we must have j=k.
By the Factor Theorem, each root ωk means (z−ωk) divides zn−1. Since ω0,ω1,…,ωn−1 are n distinct roots, the product
(z−1)(z−ω)(z−ω2)⋯(z−ωn−1)
divides zn−1. Both sides are monic polynomials of degree n, so they must be equal:
(z−1)(z−ω)⋯(z−ωn−1)=zn−1.(*)
Part (i)
We represent each vertex Xk by ωk, so X0=1 and X1=ω=e2πi/n.
Since P is equidistant from X0 and X1, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of the chord X0X1. This bisector passes through the center O and makes an angle π/n with the positive real axis. We can write
P=reiπ/n
for some real r, where ∣OP∣=∣r∣.
Taking the modulus of both sides of (∗) with z=P:
∏k=0n−1∣P−ωk∣=∣Pn−1∣.
Computing Pn=rneiπ=−rn, so
∣Pn−1∣=∣−rn−1∣=∣rn+1∣.
When n is even:rn=∣r∣n≥0, so rn+1>0, giving
∏k=0n−1∣PXk∣=rn+1=∣OP∣n+1.
This holds for all real r (both sides of O), since rn=∣r∣n when n is even.
When n is odd, there are two cases depending on the sign of r (i.e., which side of O the point P lies):
Case 1: r>0 (same side as the arc midpoint eiπ/n). Then rn>0, so
∣rn+1∣=rn+1=∣OP∣n+1.
Case 2: r<0 (opposite side of O). Write r=−s where s=∣OP∣>0. Since n is odd, rn=−sn, so
∣rn+1∣=∣1−sn∣=∣1−∣OP∣n∣.
Concretely:
If ∣OP∣>1: the product equals ∣OP∣n−1.
If ∣OP∣<1: the product equals 1−∣OP∣n.
If ∣OP∣=1: the product equals 0 (here P coincides with the vertex X(n+1)/2).
Part (ii)
The distance ∣X0Xk∣=∣1−ωk∣, so the required product is
8 (i) The function f satisfies, for all x, the equation
f(x)+(1−x)f(−x)=x2.
Show that f(−x)+(1+x)f(x)=x2. Hence find f(x) in terms of x. You should verify that your function satisfies the original equation.
(ii) The function K is defined, for x=1, by
K(x)=x−1x+1.
Show that, for x=1, K(K(x))=x.
The function g satisfies the equation
g(x)+xg(x−1x+1)=x(x=1).
Show that, for x=1, g(x)=x2+12x.
(iii) Find h(x), for x=0,x=1, given that
h(x)+h(1−x1)=1−x−1−x1(x=0,x=1).
Hint
The first result in (i) is obtained by the substitution x=−u (followed by a second u=x!). Substituting for f(−x) in the initial statement using the result obtained readily leads to f(x)=x which is simply verified. Alternatively, subtracting the result from the initial equation leads to f(x)=f(−x) which substituting gives the required result again.
In part (ii), substituting K(x) for x in the equation for g(x) gives an equation for g(x−1x+1) which can be substituted in the equation to be solved to give the desired result.
Similarly, in part (iii), substituting 1−x1 for x gives an equation for h(1−x1) and h(xx−1), and then repeating this substitution in the equation just obtained gives an equation for h(xx−1) and h(x). Adding the given and last equations and subtracting that first found leads to h(x)=21−x.