1 The curve C1 has parametric equations x=t2, y=t3, where −∞<t<∞. Let O denote the point (0,0). The points P and Q on C1 are such that ∠POQ is a right angle. Show that the tangents to C1 at P and Q intersect on the curve C2 with equation 4y2=3x−1.
Determine whether C1 and C2 meet, and sketch the two curves on the same axes.
Hint
Let P have parameter t1 and Q have parameter t2 on C1.
The derivative dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt=2t3t2=23t (for t=0).
The tangent at P(t1): y−t13=23t1(x−t12), i.e. y=23t1x−2t13.
Similarly the tangent at Q(t2): y=23t2x−2t23.
Since ∠POQ=90°, we need OP⋅OQ=0:
t12t22+t13t23=0⟹t12t22(1+t1t2)=0
Since P,Q=O, we have t1t2=−1.
Setting the two tangent equations equal to find intersection:
23t1x−2t13=23t2x−2t23
Using t2=−1/t1: x=3t12+1/t12−1 and y=2t1(1/t12−1)=2t11−t12.
Let u=t12. Then x=3u+1/u−1 and y2=4u(1−u)2=4uu2−2u+1=4u+1/u−2.
So u+1/u=3x+1, giving y2=43x+1−2=43x−1, i.e. 4y2=3x−1.
This is the curve C2, as required.
Do C1 and C2 meet? Substituting x=t2,y=t3 into 4y2=3x−1:
4t6=3t2−1⟹4t6−3t2+1=0
Let u=t2≥0: 4u3−3u+1=0. Testing u=−1: 4(−1)−3(−1)+1=−4+3+1=0, so u+1 is a factor.
4u3−3u+1=(u+1)(4u2−4u+1)=(u+1)(2u−1)2.
Since u=t2≥0, the only solution is u=1/2, i.e. t=±1/2. Since (2u−1)2 is a repeated root, the curves are tangent (touch but do not cross) at the points where t=±1/2.
Sketch:C1 is a semicubical parabola (cuspidal curve) y2=x3 symmetric about the x-axis with a cusp at the origin. C2 is a rightward-opening parabola x=34y2+1 with vertex at (1/3,0). They touch at two points where x=1/2,y=±1/(22).
Model Solution
Finding the tangent lines.
The curve C1 has parametric equations x=t2, y=t3. We compute:
dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt=2t3t2=23t(t=0)
The tangent to C1 at a general point with parameter t is:
y−t3=23t(x−t2)
Rearranging:
y=23tx−23t3+t3=23tx−2t3
So the tangent at P (parameter t1) is y=23t1x−2t13 and the tangent at Q (parameter t2) is y=23t2x−2t23.
Using the right angle condition.
Since ∠POQ=90∘, we need OP⋅OQ=0:
t12⋅t22+t13⋅t23=0
t12t22(1+t1t2)=0
Since P and Q are not the origin, t1=0 and t2=0, so t1t2=−1.
Let u=t12. Then x=3u+u−1−1 and y2=4u(1−u)2=4uu2−2u+1=4u+u−1−2.
From the expression for x: u+u−1=3x+1, so:
y2=43x+1−2=43x−1
4y2=3x−1
This is the equation of C2, as required.
Do C1 and C2 meet?
Substituting x=t2, y=t3 into 4y2=3x−1:
4t6=3t2−1⟹4t6−3t2+1=0
Setting u=t2≥0: 4u3−3u+1=0. Testing u=−1: 4(−1)−3(−1)+1=−4+3+1=0, so (u+1) is a factor.
4u3−3u+1=(u+1)(4u2−4u+1)=(u+1)(2u−1)2
Since u=t2≥0, the factor (u+1) gives no solutions. The repeated factor (2u−1)2=0 gives u=1/2, i.e. t=±1/2.
The curves meet at two points: (1/2,±1/(22)). Since the root u=1/2 is repeated, the curves are tangent at these points (they touch but do not cross).
Sketch.C1: y2=x3 is a semicubical parabola with a cusp at the origin, symmetric about the x-axis. C2: x=(4y2+1)/3 is a rightward-opening parabola with vertex at (1/3,0). The two curves touch at (1/2,±1/(22)).
Examiner Notes
This was a popular question and many very good solutions were seen. The first part of the question was a relatively straightforward application of differentiation and parametric equations and was successfully completed by many of the candidates. The sketches produced were generally the correct shape for the parabola, although in some cases it was not in the correct position. The other curve caused more problems with some candidates drawing another parabola or similar shape.
Complete factorisation: By symmetry in a,b,c, the factors b+c−a and c+a−b must also be factors. Since the expression has degree 3 and each factor has degree 1, we need a constant multiplier k:
(ii) Setting d+e=c in the 4-variable version. By the same factor theorem argument (substituting e=d+a+b shows a+b−d−e is a factor), and by symmetry, the factors a+d−b−e and a+e−b−d are also factors.
The complete factorisation is −3(a+b−d−e)(a+d−b−e)(a+e−b−d).
Since substituting c=a+b gives zero, (a+b−c) is a factor by the factor theorem.
Complete factorisation.
The expression is symmetric in a,b,c. By the same argument, (b+c−a) and (c+a−b) are also factors. Since the expression has degree 3 and each factor has degree 1, we have:
Part (ii). We show (a+b−d−e) is a factor of the four-variable expression. Setting e=c−d (i.e. d+e=c) reduces the four-variable expression to the three-variable expression. When a+b=d+e=c, we have c=a+b and e=a+b−d, so the expression equals zero. By the factor theorem, (a+b−d−e) is a factor.
By symmetry in a,b,d,e, the factors (a+d−b−e) and (a+e−b−d) are also factors. The complete factorisation is:
−3(a+b−d−e)(a+d−b−e)(a+e−b−d)
Solving the equation(x+6)3−6(x+6)(x2+14)+8(x3+36)=0.
This question received poor responses in terms of the average mark per attempt. Application of the factor theorem to the first part often produced a neat solution. However, a number of candidates in the first part did not use the factor theorem as requested and so produced very complicated algebraic expressions that were more of a challenge to simplify. Where the result had been successfully shown and the expression factorised, many candidates were able to see the relevance to solving the equation in part (i). Those candidates who were able to follow through the method to successfully factorise the second expression were often able to complete the question.
3 For each non-negative integer n, the polynomial fn is defined by
fn(x)=1+x+2!x2+3!x3+⋯+n!xn.
(i) Show that fn′(x)=fn−1(x) (for n⩾1).
(ii) Show that, if a is a real root of the equation
fn(x)=0,(*)
then a<0.
(iii) Let a and b be distinct real roots of (∗), for n⩾2. Show that fn′(a)fn′(b)>0 and use a sketch to deduce that fn(c)=0 for some number c between a and b.
Deduce that (∗) has at most one real root. How many real roots does (∗) have if n is odd? How many real roots does (∗) have if n is even?
(ii) If a>0, then every term k!ak>0 for k≥0, so fn(a)>0. If a=0, then fn(0)=1=0. Therefore any real root must satisfy a<0.
(iii) Suppose a and b are distinct real roots with a<b. Then fn(a)=fn(b)=0.
From part (i), fn′(x)=fn−1(x) and fn(x)=fn−1(x)+n!xn, so fn′(x)=fn(x)−n!xn.
At a root: fn′(a)=fn(a)−n!an=−n!an and fn′(b)=−n!bn.
Since a,b<0 (from part (ii)), an and bn have the same sign (both positive if n is even, both negative if n is odd).
So fn′(a)⋅fn′(b)=(n!)2anbn=(n!)2(ab)n>0 (since ab>0).
This means fn′(a) and fn′(b) have the same sign, so the tangent lines at a and b slope in the same direction. Since fn is a polynomial (hence continuous and differentiable), and fn(a)=fn(b)=0 with same-sign derivatives, by the graph fn must cross zero again between a and b — say at some c with a<c<b.
But then c is also a root, and we can repeat the argument between a and c, and between c and b, finding infinitely many roots. Since fn is a polynomial of degree n (finite), this is a contradiction. Therefore fn(x)=0 has at most one real root.
Number of roots:
If n is odd: fn(x)→+∞ as x→+∞ and fn(x)→−∞ as x→−∞ (leading term xn/n! dominates). By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there is at least one real root. Combined with “at most one”, there is exactly one real root.
If n is even: fn(x)→+∞ as x→±∞. Since fn(0)=1>0 and fn has at most one real root, and any root must be negative: if there were a root a<0, then fn′(a)=−an/n!<0 (since an>0 for even n), so fn is decreasing at a. But fn→+∞ as x→−∞, so fn must increase then decrease, meaning fn′ has a zero, contradicting the fact that fn−1 (odd degree) has exactly one real root which is negative and fn−1(0)=1>0… Actually, for even n, fn has no real roots. For n=2: f2(x)=1+x+x2/2, discriminant =1−2=−1<0, confirming no real roots.
Model Solution
Part (i). We have fn(x)=∑k=0nk!xk. Differentiating term by term:
fn′(x)=∑k=1nk!kxk−1=∑k=1n(k−1)!xk−1
Setting j=k−1:
fn′(x)=∑j=0n−1j!xj=fn−1(x)
Part (ii). Suppose a is a real root of fn(x)=0.
If a>0: every term k!ak>0 for k≥0, and the first term is 1>0, so fn(a)>0. Contradiction.
If a=0: fn(0)=1=0. Contradiction.
Therefore a<0.
Part (iii). Suppose a and b are distinct real roots of fn(x)=0 with n≥2. From part (ii), a<0 and b<0.
Since fn(x)=fn−1(x)+n!xn, we have fn′(x)=fn−1(x)=fn(x)−n!xn.
At a root, fn(a)=0, so:
fn′(a)=−n!an
Similarly fn′(b)=−n!bn.
Therefore:
fn′(a)⋅fn′(b)=(n!)2an⋅bn=(n!)2(ab)n
Since a<0 and b<0, we have ab>0, so (ab)n>0. Hence fn′(a)⋅fn′(b)>0.
Deducing at most one real root.
Since fn′(a) and fn′(b) have the same sign, the tangent lines at a and b slope in the same direction. Since fn(a)=fn(b)=0 and fn is continuous:
If fn′(a)>0 and fn′(b)>0: the function is increasing at both roots. Since fn(a)=0 and fn is increasing at a, fn must be negative just to the left of a and positive just to the right. Since fn is increasing at b too, fn must be negative just to the left of b and positive just to the right. But between a and b, fn must go from positive (right of a) to negative (left of b), so by the Intermediate Value Theorem, fn(c)=0 for some c between a and b.
If fn′(a)<0 and fn′(b)<0: a symmetric argument (decreasing at both roots) also gives a root c between a and b.
In either case, c is another distinct real root. We can now repeat the argument between a and c, finding yet another root, and so on. This would give infinitely many roots, contradicting the fact that fn is a polynomial of degree n (which has at most n roots). Therefore fn(x)=0 has at most one real root.
Number of roots when n is odd.
The leading term of fn is n!xn. When n is odd:
fn(x)→+∞ as x→+∞
fn(x)→−∞ as x→−∞
Since fn is continuous, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, fn has at least one real root. Combined with “at most one”, fn(x)=0 has exactly one real root when n is odd.
Number of roots when n is even.
When n is even, fn(x)→+∞ as x→±∞. We know fn(0)=1>0 and any real root must be negative. Suppose a<0 is a root. Then:
fn′(a)=−n!an
Since n is even and a<0, an>0, so fn′(a)<0: the function is decreasing at a.
Since fn(a)=0, fn is positive just to the left of a and negative just to the right. But fn(x)→+∞ as x→−∞, so fn must have decreased from +∞ to 0 at a, meaning fn was positive for all sufficiently negative x. As x increases past a, fn becomes negative. But fn(0)=1>0, so fn must cross zero again at some point between a and 0. This gives a second real root, contradicting “at most one”.
Therefore fn(x)=0 has no real roots when n is even.
Examiner Notes
This was the most popular question on the paper, and candidates generally scored well here. The first two parts were relatively straightforward and were answered well. The final part required careful explanation from candidates and many were not able to take the initial step of rewriting the relationship between the function and its derivative in a useful way. Those who did successfully complete this part were often able to identify the number of roots in each of the two cases.
So y2+1=4(y−1)2. Taking square roots (both sides positive since y>1):
y2+1=2(y−1)
Finding tanθ.
For the maximum to be achieved, both inequalities in the chain must be equalities.
From (y2+1)cos2(θ+α)=y2+1, we need cos2(θ+α)=1, so θ+α=kπ for integer k.
With tanα=y1=4+73=16−73(4−7)=93(4−7)=34−7.
Taking θ+α=0 (so θ=−α):
tanθ=−tanα=−34−7=37−4
Finding x.
From (†), the discriminant is zero, so there is exactly one value of x:
x=−2(y−1)ycosθ−sinθ
Since ycosθ−sinθ=y2+1cos(θ+α)=y2+1⋅(±1). With θ+α=0, cos(θ+α)=1, so:
ycosθ−sinθ=y2+1=2(y−1)
x=−2(y−1)2(y−1)=−1
Therefore x=−1 and tanθ=37−4.
Examiner Notes
This question attracted many good responses which often successfully accomplished the first and third results of part (i) of the question, although in many cases marks were lost through incomplete explanations of some of the steps taken. Part (ii) of the question was generally answered poorly with some candidates simply stating that the square root of one expression in terms of surds was equal to the other one that they had achieved. Only a small number of candidates successfully completed the last section of this question.
5 In this question, the definition of (pq) is taken to be
(pq)={q!(p−q)!p!0if p⩾q⩾0,otherwise .
(i) Write down the coefficient of xn in the binomial expansion for (1−x)−N, where N is a positive integer, and write down the expansion using the Σ summation notation.
By considering (1−x)−1(1−x)−N, where N is a positive integer, show that
∑j=0n(N+j−1j)=(N+nn).
(ii) Show that, for any positive integers m,n and r with r⩽m+n,
(m+nr)=∑j=0r(mj)(nr−j).
(iii) Show that, for any positive integers m and N,
∑j=0n(−1)j(N+mn−j)(m+j−1j)=(Nn).
Hint
(i) The binomial expansion of (1−x)−N where N is a positive integer:
(1−x)−N=∑n=0∞(nN+n−1)xn
The coefficient of xn is (nN+n−1)=n!(N−1)!(N+n−1)!.
Proving the identity:(1−x)−1(1−x)−N=(1−x)−(N+1).
(1−x)−1=∑k=0∞xk, so the coefficient of xn in (1−x)−1(1−x)−N is:
∑j=0n1⋅(jN+j−1)=∑j=0n(jN+j−1)
But (1−x)−(N+1)=∑n=0∞(nN+n)xn, so the coefficient of xn is (nN+n).
Equating: ∑j=0n(jN+j−1)=(nN+n).
(ii) Consider (1+x)m(1+x)n=(1+x)m+n.
The coefficient of xr on the left is ∑j=0r(jm)(r−jn) (by the Cauchy product / Vandermonde convolution).
By the Cauchy product, the coefficient of xn in the product is:
∑j=0n(−1)j(jm+j−1)⋅(n−jN+m)
The coefficient of xn in (1+x)N is (nN).
Equating:
∑j=0n(−1)j(n−jN+m)(jm+j−1)=(nN)
Examiner Notes
This was the least attempted of all of the Pure questions and one that generally produced low marks for candidates, who generally appeared to have difficulty in expressing the coefficients of the binomial expansion in the required form. In each case the desired answer was given in the question, and so successful solutions also needed to be very clear about the reasoning used to reach the answer.
6 This question concerns solutions of the differential equation
(1−x2)(dxdy)2+k2y2=k2(*)
where k is a positive integer.
For each value of k, let yk(x) be the solution of (∗) that satisfies yk(1)=1; you may assume that there is only one such solution for each value of k.
(i) Write down the differential equation satisfied by y1(x) and verify that y1(x)=x.
(ii) Write down the differential equation satisfied by y2(x) and verify that y2(x)=2x2−1.
(iii) Let z(x)=2(yn(x))2−1. Show that
(1−x2)(dxdz)2+4n2z2=4n2
and hence obtain an expression for y2n(x) in terms of yn(x).
(iv) Let v(x)=yn(ym(x)). Show that v(x)=ymn(x).
Hint
Parts (i) and (ii) only require verification in each of the cases, so simply differentiate the functions given and substitute into the differential equation to confirm that they are solutions. Remember to check as well that the boundary conditions are satisfied.
For part (iii), differentiate the given formula for z and substitute into the differential equation. By observing that the new differential equation is of the same form as (*), but for 2n instead of n, the expression for y2n(x) can be established.
For part (iv), again differentiate the given formula, being careful about the application of the chain rule and substitute. Again, by comparing with (*) the final result should be clear.
Model Solution
Part (i): k=1.
The differential equation with k=1 is:
(1−x2)(dxdy)2+y2=1
We verify y1(x)=x: dxdy1=1, and y1(1)=1. ✓
Substituting: (1−x2)(1)2+x2=1−x2+x2=1. ✓
Part (ii): k=2.
The differential equation with k=2 is:
(1−x2)(dxdy)2+4y2=4
We verify y2(x)=2x2−1: dxdy2=4x, and y2(1)=2−1=1. ✓
Also: z=2yn2−1, so yn2=2z+1 and 1−yn2=1−2z+1=21−z.
Therefore:
(1−x2)(dxdz)2=16n2⋅2z+1⋅21−z=4n2(1−z2)
(1−x2)(dxdz)2+4n2z2=4n2
This is the differential equation (∗) with k=2n. Also z(1)=2(yn(1))2−1=2(1)2−1=1.
Since the solution satisfying y(1)=1 is unique, z(x)=y2n(x).
Therefore:
y2n(x)=2(yn(x))2−1
Part (iv). Let v(x)=yn(ym(x)). We show v=ymn.
By the chain rule:
dxdv=yn′(ym(x))⋅ym′(x)
Squaring:
(dxdv)2=(yn′)2ym(x)⋅(ym′)2
From the differential equation for yn (with k=n, evaluated at ym(x), using ym(x)∈[−1,1]):
(1−ym2)(yn′)2ym=n2(1−yn2(ym))=n2(1−v2)
From the differential equation for ym (with k=m):
(1−x2)(ym′)2=m2(1−ym2)
Therefore:
(1−x2)(dxdv)2=(1−x2)(ym′)2⋅(yn′)2ym
=m2(1−ym2)⋅(yn′)2ym
=m2⋅1−ym2n2(1−v2)⋅(1−ym2)=m2n2(1−v2)
So:
(1−x2)(dxdv)2+m2n2v2=m2n2
This is the differential equation (∗) with k=mn. Also v(1)=yn(ym(1))=yn(1)=1.
By uniqueness of the solution with y(1)=1:
yn(ym(x))=ymn(x)
Examiner Notes
Many candidates did not appear to read the question carefully enough and so attempted to solve the differential equations in parts (i) and (ii) rather than simply verifying the results given. Where candidates moved on to parts (iii) and (iv) they were generally successful if they were able to complete the differentiation of the new function.
where f is any function for which the integrals exist.
(i) Use (∗) to evaluate
∫021πcosx+sinxsinxdx.
(ii) Evaluate
∫041πcosx+sinxsinxdx.
(iii) Evaluate
∫041πln(1+tanx)dx.
(iv) Evaluate
∫041πcosx(cosx+sinx)xdx.
Hint
The first result can be shown by using a substitution into the integral, being careful to explain the change of sign when the limits of the integral are switched.
Simple application of knowledge of trigonometric graphs once the substitution has been made can be used to show that twice the integral is equivalent to integrating the function 1 over the interval.
Similarly, the remaining integrals can all be rearranged using standard trigonometric identities and knowledge of logarithms into forms that can be integrated from standard results once the substitution from (*) has been made.
Model Solution
Proving ∫0af(x)dx=∫0af(a−x)dx.
Substitute u=a−x, so du=−dx. When x=0, u=a; when x=a, u=0.
So K=∫0π/4ln(1+tanx2)dx=∫0π/4[ln2−ln(1+tanx)]dx.
K=4πln2−K
2K=4πln2
K=8πln2
Part (iv). Let L=∫0π/4cosx(cosx+sinx)xdx.
Using cosx(cosx+sinx)1=cos2x(1+tanx)1=1+tanxsec2x.
Note that dxdln(1+tanx)=1+tanxsec2x. So we integrate by parts with u=x, dv=1+tanxsec2xdx:
L=[xln(1+tanx)]0π/4−∫0π/4ln(1+tanx)dx
=4πln2−0−8πln2=8πln2
Examiner Notes
This was the second most popular and one of the best-answered questions on the paper, with many candidates scoring very high marks. In many cases the initial result was explained clearly and then applied successfully to the first example. Candidates were generally able to follow through the calculations where they were able to see the way in which the result could be achieved, and so most of the attempts that followed a correct method only lost marks through occasional errors in calculation.
(i) You are given that the infinite series ∑r=1∞r21 converges to a value denoted by E. Use (∗) to obtain the following approximations for E:
E≈2;E≈35;E≈2033.
(ii) Show that, when r is large, the error in approximating r21 by ∫r−21r+21x21dx is approximately 4r41.
Given that E≈1.645, show that ∑r=1∞r41≈1.08.
Hint
The integral required at the start of the question should be a straightforward one to evaluate. When making a sketch to illustrate the result in the second part, ensure that the sum is indicated by a series of rectangles, with the graph of the curve passing through the midpoints of the tops.
In part (i), the integral that would match the sum given results in an answer of 2, so this is the first of the estimates. The remaining estimates arise from using the integral to estimate most of the sum, but taking the first few terms as the exact values (so in each case the integration is taken from a different lower limit).
For part (ii), evaluate the integral for one particular term of the sum and note that it is approximately rac{1}{4r^4}. Finally, using the most accurate estimate for E \left( rac{33}{20}
ight) the sum from r=3 onwards can be calculated and then the first two values of rac{1}{r^4} can be added to achieve the desired result.
Draw the curve y=1/x2 for x>0. For each integer r from m to n, draw a rectangle of width 1 centred at x=r, i.e. from x=r−1/2 to x=r+1/2, with height 1/r2. The curve y=1/x2 passes through the midpoint of the top of each rectangle.
Since 1/x2 is a smooth, convex, decreasing function, the area of each rectangle (equal to 1/r2) is approximately equal to the area under the curve over [r−1/2,r+1/2]. The errors at adjacent intervals partially cancel (the curve is above the rectangle on one side and below on the other), so:
For large r, r2−1/4≈r2, so the error is approximately:
r4−1/4=−4r41
The magnitude of the error is approximately 4r41.
Finding ∑r=1∞1/r4.
From the approximation (∗) with m=1 and n→∞, the total error is:
E−∫1/2∞x21dx=E−2
This total error is the sum of the individual errors ∑r=1∞(r21−∫r−1/2r+1/2x21dx).
For large r, each error is approximately −1/(4r4). The errors for small r also contribute, but using the approximation for all r:
E−2≈−41∑r=1∞r41
With E≈1.645:
1.645−2=−0.355≈−41∑r=1∞r41
∑r=1∞r41≈4×0.355=1.42
However, the approximation 4r41 is not very accurate for small r. A more careful approach: use the most accurate estimate E≈33/20 to find the sum from r=3 onwards, then add the first two terms exactly.
From E−5/4≈2/5, the error in this approximation is 33/20−5/4−2/5=33/20−25/20−8/20=0. So the approximation E≈33/20 absorbs the error from r=1 and r=2 exactly.
Using the error formula: the total error from r=3 onwards is approximately −41∑r=3∞r41.
The actual value of ∑r=3∞1/r2=E−1−1/4=E−5/4 and the integral estimate is 2/5. The error is:
(E−45)−52≈−41∑r=3∞r41
With E≈1.645: E−5/4=0.395, and 0.395−0.4=−0.005.
−0.005≈−41∑r=3∞r41
∑r=3∞r41≈0.02
Adding the first two terms: 1+1/16=1.0625.
∑r=1∞r41≈1.0625+0.02=1.08
Examiner Notes
The first task in this question was generally well answered, although sketches were often unclear or difficult to interpret. In part (i) many candidates were able to obtain the first approximation, but then could not see how to achieve the other two, often offering sums of a non-integer number of terms which gives the correct approximation when substituted into the formula. Those who successfully completed part (i) were often able to approximate the error in part (ii) and see how it applies to the final sum.