Q1(i) Put the terms with radicals on one side and the terms without on the other and square. Repeat this strategy (S) and the equation x^4 - 6x^3 + 9x^2 - 4x = 0 () will be obtained. The roots of () are x = 0, 1, 4.
Squaring may introduce spurious roots, so these numbers must be checked to see that they are roots of the original equation. In fact, they are.
(ii) Application of S again leads to (*). Checking shows that x = 0, x = 1 are roots of the second equation but that x = 4 is not.
(iii) Again application of S leads to (*). Checking shows that x = 1, x = 4 are roots of the third equation but that x = 0 is not.
Model Solution
Part (i)
Rearrange the equation as
3x2+1+x=2x+1
The domain requires x≥0 (for x to exist). For x≥0, both sides are non-negative, so squaring preserves equivalence.
Square both sides:
3x2+1+2x(3x2+1)+x=4x2+4x+1
Rearrange to isolate the remaining radical:
2x(3x2+1)=4x2+4x+1−3x2−1−x=x2+3x
So
2x(3x2+1)=x(x+3)(*)
For x≥0, both sides of (*) are non-negative. Square again:
4x(3x2+1)=x2(x+3)2
If x=0: both sides equal 0, so x=0 satisfies this equation. Check in the original: 1+0−0−1=0 ✓.
It is therefore unnecessary to consider x > 0 and x < 0 separately and even more unnecessary to use calculus methods.
if α = 3 then Q = (|x| - 1)(|x| - 2), in which case the solution set of Q < 0 is {x : -2 < x < -1} ∪ {x : 1 < x < 2}.
The solutions in x of the equation Q = 0 are of the form -x2, -x1, x1, x2, where 0 < x1 < x2, so that S = 2(x2 - x1). Use of the identity x2 - x1 = sqrt((x2 + x1)^2 - 4x1x2) will lead immediately to S = 2sqrt(α^2 - 8). Thus S < 2sqrt(α^2) = 2α.
The graph of S as a function of α is that part of the hyperbola 4α^2 - S^2 = 32 which is in the first quadrant. A sketch of this graph should, therefore, leave the other quadrants empty. It should also show the curve starting at the point (2√2, 0) and asymptotically approaching the line S = 2α.
Model Solution
Proof that no solution exists when ∣α∣<22:
Let u=∣x∣≥0. Since x2=∣x∣2=u2, the inequality becomes
u2−αu+2<0
Complete the square:
(u−2α)2+2−4α2<0
This requires
(u−2α)2<4α2−2
If ∣α∣<22, then α2<8, so 4α2<2, hence 4α2−2<0.
Since (u−2α)2≥0 for all real u, we would need a non-negative quantity to be strictly less than a negative quantity, which is impossible.
Therefore, when ∣α∣<22, there is no value of x for which x2−α∣x∣+2<0.
Solution set for α=3:
x2−3∣x∣+2=(∣x∣−1)(∣x∣−2)
The inequality (∣x∣−1)(∣x∣−2)<0 holds when one factor is positive and the other is negative, i.e., 1<∣x∣<2.
This gives −2<x<−1 or 1<x<2.
Solution set: {x:−2<x<−1}∪{x:1<x<2}.
Finding S for α>22:
The equation x2−α∣x∣+2=0 is equivalent to ∣x∣2−α∣x∣+2=0. By the quadratic formula:
∣x∣=2α±α2−8
Since α>22, we have α2>8, so α2−8 is real and positive. Define:
x1=2α−α2−8,x2=2α+α2−8
Since α2−8<α (as 8>0), both roots are positive with 0<x1<x2.
The inequality x2−α∣x∣+2<0 holds when x1<∣x∣<x2, i.e.,
x∈(−x2,−x1)∪(x1,x2)
The total length of these two intervals is
S=(x2−x1)+(x2−x1)=2(x2−x1)
By Vieta’s formulas applied to ∣x∣2−α∣x∣+2=0:
x1+x2=α,x1x2=2
Therefore
(x2−x1)2=(x1+x2)2−4x1x2=α2−8
x2−x1=α2−8
S=2α2−8
Showing S<2α:
Since α2−8<α2 (as 8>0), taking positive square roots:
α2−8<α2=α
(since α>22>0). Therefore
S=2α2−8<2α
Sketch of S against α:
From S=2α2−8, squaring gives S2=4α2−32, i.e.,
4α2−S2=32
This is a hyperbola in the (α,S)-plane with asymptotes S=±2α. For α>22 and S>0, we take the branch in the first quadrant:
The curve starts at the point (22,0).
As α→∞, the curve approaches the line S=2α from below.
The curve lies entirely below the line S=2α for all α>22, consistent with the result S<2α.
A sketch should show only this first-quadrant branch, with the asymptote S=2α drawn as a dashed line.
Show that the gradient of C is (x−2)3(6x2+x−2) and find the coordinates of all the stationary points. Determine the nature of each stationary point and sketch C.
In separate diagrams draw sketches of the curves whose equations are:
(i) y2=x(x+1)(x−2)4;
(ii) y=x2(x2+1)(x2−2)4.
In each case, you should pay particular attention to the points where the curve meets the x axis.
Hint
Q3 The obtaining of dy/dx in the form required is a routine exercise in differentiation followed by some algebra.
Setting dy/dx = 0 shows that there are stationary points where x = -2/3, 1/2, 2. Moreover d^2y/dx^2 = (x - 2)^3(12x + 1) + a term which is necessarily zero when x = -2/3, 1/2, 2. Thus d^2y/dx^2 is positive when x = -2/3 and negative when x = 1/2, so that C has a minimum at (-2/3, -8192/729) and a maximum at (1/2, 243/64). (Note that it is unnecessary to determine a simplified version of d^2y/dx^2 before inserting values of x.)
The argument d^2y/dx^2 = 0 at x = 2 => C has a point of inflexion at (2, 0) is false. In fact, in the neighbourhood of this point, y ≈ 6(x - 2)^4, so that it is obvious that C has a minimum there.
The sketch of C must have correct overall shape, location and orientation, and also show correct forms at (0,0), (2,0) and at ∞.
(i) This sketch may be deduced from that of C. It has symmetry about the x-axis and no part of it appears in the region -1 < x < 0.
(ii) This sketch may also be deduced from that of C. It has symmetry about the y-axis and no part of it appears in the region y < 0.
Model Solution
Finding dxdy:
Let y=x(x+1)(x−2)4. We use the product rule with u=x(x+1)=x2+x and v=(x−2)4:
dxdu=2x+1,dxdv=4(x−2)3
dxdy=(2x+1)(x−2)4+(x2+x)⋅4(x−2)3
Factor out (x−2)3:
dxdy=(x−2)3[(2x+1)(x−2)+4(x2+x)]
Expand the bracket:
(2x+1)(x−2)+4x2+4x=2x2−4x+x−2+4x2+4x=6x2+x−2
Therefore
dxdy=(x−2)3(6x2+x−2)✓
Stationary points:
Set dxdy=0: either (x−2)3=0 giving x=2, or 6x2+x−2=0.
For 6x2+x−2=0, factor: 6x2+x−2=(2x−1)(3x+2)=0, so x=21 or x=−32.
At x=2: both terms vanish, so y′′=0. We need a different approach. Near x=2:
y=x(x+1)(x−2)4≈2⋅3⋅(x−2)4=6(x−2)4
Since 6(x−2)4≥0 with equality only at x=2, the point (2,0) is a minimum (a flat minimum, where the curve touches the x-axis).
Sketch of C:
Key features: y=0 at x=0,−1,2. The curve has a minimum at (−32,−7298192)≈(−0.67,−11.24), a maximum at (21,64243)≈(0.5,3.80), and a flat minimum at (2,0). As x→+∞, y→+∞; as x→−∞, y→+∞ (since x(x+1)→+∞ and (x−2)4→+∞).
Sketch (i): y2=x(x+1)(x−2)4
This curve has symmetry about the x-axis (replacing y by −y leaves the equation unchanged).
It exists only where x(x+1)(x−2)4≥0. Since (x−2)4≥0 always, we need x(x+1)≥0, i.e., x≤−1 or x≥0. The region −1<x<0 has no curve.
The curve meets the x-axis at x=−1,0,2. Away from these points, y=±x(x+1)(x−2)4, so the curve is a symmetric pair of branches above and below the x-axis, shaped like the original curve C but reflected.
Sketch (ii): y=x2(x2+1)(x2−2)4
This function is even: f(−x)=f(x), so the curve is symmetric about the y-axis.
Since x2≥0, (x2+1)>0, and (x2−2)4≥0, we have y≥0 for all x. The curve lies entirely in the upper half-plane.
Zeros: x=0 (from x2, double root — curve touches axis and turns back) and x=±2 (from (x2−2)4, even multiplicity — flat minimum touching axis).
The shape in the right half-plane (x≥0) mirrors that of C with x replaced by x2: a local maximum between x=0 and x=2, then a flat minimum at x=2, then y→∞ as x→∞. By symmetry, the left half-plane is the mirror image.
(i) An attempt is made to move a rod of length L from a corridor of width a into a corridor of width b, where a=b. The corridors meet at right angles, as shown in Figure 1 and the rod remains horizontal. Show that if the attempt is to be successful then
L≤acosecα+bsecα,
where α satisfies
tan3α=ba.
(ii) An attempt is made to move a rectangular table-top, of width w and length l, from one corridor to the other, as shown in the Figure 2. The table-top remains horizontal. Show that if the attempt is to be successful then
l≤acosecβ+bsecβ−2wcosec2β,
where β satisfies
w=(1−tan2βa−btan3β)cosβ.
Hint
Q4 It is important to realise at the outset that α is a constant defined by a and b and that β is a constant defined by a, b and w. Variable angles θ/φ are needed to define the orientation of the rod/table in the general situation.
(i) Clearly, for all θ ∈ (0, π/2), it is necessary that f(θ) ≥ L, where f(θ) = a csc θ + b sec θ. Setting f’(θ) = 0 will then lead to the required result.
(ii) Here, for all φ ∈ (0, π/2), it is necessary that y ≥ l, where y is such that b = (y-x) cos φ + w sin φ and x is such that a = x sin φ + w cos φ. (Other formulations are possible.) Elimination of x leads to y = a csc φ + b sec φ - 2w csc 2φ
Setting y’(φ) = 0 plus some further working will then produce the required result.
Model Solution
Part (i).
Let θ be the variable angle the rod makes with the corridor of width b. The rod extends a distance sinθa=acosecθ in the a-corridor and cosθb=bsecθ in the b-corridor.
For the rod to fit through the corner:
L≤acosecθ+bsecθfor all θ∈(0,π/2)(*)
Define f(θ)=acosecθ+bsecθ. The tightest constraint comes at the minimum of f.
f′(θ)=−acosecθcotθ+bsecθtanθ
Setting f′(θ)=0:
bsecθtanθ=acosecθcotθ
cos2θbsinθ=sin2θacosθ
Cross-multiply:
bsin3θ=acos3θ
tan3θ=ba
The critical angle α satisfies tan3α=ba. Since f(θ)→∞ as θ→0+ (because cosecθ→∞) and as θ→2π− (because secθ→∞), this critical point must be a minimum.
From (*), evaluated at θ=α:
L≤acosecα+bsecα
Part (ii).
Let ϕ be the variable angle the table-top makes with the b-corridor. Let x be the distance from the corner along the table’s inner edge to the point where it meets the a-corridor wall, and let y−x be the distance from the corner to the point where it meets the b-corridor wall.
The table’s width w is perpendicular to its length. Projecting onto each corridor direction:
a=xsinϕ+wcosϕ(*)
b=(y−x)cosϕ+wsinϕ(**)
From (*): x=sinϕa−wcosϕ.
From (**): y−x=cosϕb−wsinϕ.
Adding:
y=sinϕa−wcosϕ+cosϕb−wsinϕ
=sinϕa−sinϕwcosϕ+cosϕb−cosϕwsinϕ
=acosecϕ+bsecϕ−w(sinϕcosϕ+cosϕsinϕ)
=acosecϕ+bsecϕ−w⋅sinϕcosϕcos2ϕ+sin2ϕ
=acosecϕ+bsecϕ−sinϕcosϕw
Since sinϕcosϕ=21sin2ϕ, we have sinϕcosϕ1=2cosec2ϕ, so
y=acosecϕ+bsecϕ−2wcosec2ϕ
For the table to fit: l≤y for all ϕ∈(0,π/2).
The critical angle β minimizes y. Setting dϕdy=0:
dϕdy=−acosecϕcotϕ+bsecϕtanϕ+4wcosec2ϕcot2ϕ=0
Converting to sin and cos and using sin22ϕ=4sin2ϕcos2ϕ:
Use the expression (**) to find A and B by substituting for f(t) and f(x) in (*) and equating coefficients of sint and cost.
Hint
Q5 Using the integration by parts rule it is easy to establish the results ∫₀^π x sin x dx = π and ∫₀^π x cos x dx = -2.
Write sin(x + t) = sin x cos t + sin t cos x and the result f(t) = t + A sin t + B cos t, where A and B are as defined in the question, follows immediately.
Hence write t + A sin t + B cos t = t + ∫₀^π (x + A sin x + B cos x) sin(x + t) dx (***) so that as
∫₀^π x sin(x + t) dx = … = π cos t - 2 sin t,
∫₀^π sin x sin(x + t) dx = … = (π/2) cos t,
∫₀^π cos x sin(x + t) dx = … = (π/2) sin t,
then, by considering the coefficients of cos t and sin t on both sides of (***), it follows that
A = -2 + (π/2)B, B = π + (π/2)A => A = -2, B = 0.
Alternatively, equations for A and B can be obtained by putting t = 0 and t = π/2 in (***).
Model Solution
Part 1: Evaluating the integrals
Integral 1:I1=∫0πxsinxdx
Integration by parts with u=x, dv=sinxdx (so du=dx, v=−cosx):
6 The vectors a and b lie in the plane Π. Given that ∣a∣=1 and a⋅b=3, find, in terms of a and b, a vector p parallel to a and a vector q perpendicular to a, both lying in the plane Π, such that
p+q=a+b.
The vector c is not parallel to the plane Π and is such that a⋅c=−2 and b⋅c=2. Given that ∣b∣=5, find, in terms of a, b and c, vectors P, Q and R such that P and Q are parallel to p and q, respectively, R is perpendicular to the plane Π and
P+Q+R=a+b+c.
Hint
From the data it follows that the component of b in the direction of a is 3a.
Hence p=4a and q=b−3a.
Again from the data, it follows that (c.a)a=−2a and
Show graphically that the equation f(x)=0 has exactly one root in the interval [21π,π]. This interval is denoted I0.
In order to determine the root, a sequence of intervals I1,I2,… is generated in the following way. If the interval In=[an,bn], and cn=(an+bn)/2, then
By using the approximations 21≈0.7 and π≈10, show that I2=[21π,85π] and find I3.
Hint
Good sketch graphs of y=x and y=2sinx, in the same diagram and over the interval [0,π], will readily show that the equation f(x)=0 has exactly one root in the interval [π/2,π].
f(3π/4)=2−3π/4 has the same sign as 2 - 9\pi^2/16 pprox 2 - 45/8 = -29/8 < 0. Hence as f(π/2)=2−π/2>0 and f(π)=−π<0, then I1=[π/2,3π/4].
x=sin5π/8⇒2x1−x2=sin3π/4=1/2⇒8x4−8x2+1=0 (*) \Rightarrow x^2 = 1/2 + 1/(2\sqrt{2}) pprox 0.85. (**). The sign of f(5π/8) is the same as that of 4x^2 - 25\pi^2/64 pprox 17/5 - 125/32 = -81/625 < 0. Hence I2=[π/2,5π/8].
A good approximation to x=sin9π/16 may also be obtained in a similar way. In fact, it will be found that f(9π/16)>0 so that I3=[9π/16,5π/8].
Model Solution
Graphical argument for exactly one root in [2π,π]:
Consider f(x)=2sinx−x on [0,π]. At the endpoints of the interval:
f(2π)=2sin2π−2π=2−2π≈2−1.57=0.43>0
f(π)=2sinπ−π=−π<0
Since f is continuous and changes sign on [2π,π], there is at least one root. Moreover, f′(x)=2cosx−1, which is negative on [2π,π] (since cosx≤0 there), so f is strictly decreasing. Hence there is exactly one root in this interval.
(i) Solve the equation in the case n=1 and sketch the graph of the solution for t>0.
(ii) Prove that 1−x<(1−x2)1/2 for 0<x<1.
Use this result to sketch the graph of the solution in the case n=2 for 0<t<21π, using the same axes as your previous sketch.
By setting x=siny, solve the equation in this case.
(iii) Use the result (which you need not prove)
(1−x2)1/2<(1−x3)1/3for0<x<1,
to sketch, without solving the equation, the graph of the solution of the equation in the case n=3 using the same axes as your previous sketches. Use your sketch to show that x=1 at a value of t less than 21π.
Hint
Q8(i) Integration leads to the general solution t=A−ln(1−x) and x(0)=0⇒A=0. Thus x=1−e−t.
(ii) Obviously, (1−x)1/2<(1+x)1/2 for all x∈(0,1]. Hence multiplying this inequality through by (1−x)1/2 leads immediately to the required result.
Arguments which go in the wrong direction, e.g., 1−x<(1−x2)1/2⇒⋯⇒x−x2>0, etc., are invalid. It may be possible to salvage them by replacing ’⇒′ by ’⇐′.
In the case n=2, the substitution x=siny will lead to t=y+B and hence to t=sin−1(x)+B as the general solution. In particular, x(0)=0⇒B=0⇒x=sint.
Note that the question does not allow the use of the standard form ∫(1−x2)−1/2dx=sin−1(x)+ an arbitrary constant, without proof.
(iii) If Gn is the graph of x for 0≤x≤1, then the given inequality shows that the gradient of G3 is greater than the gradient of G2 for each x in this interval. (The inequality of (ii) shows that the same is true of G2 in relation to G1.) These considerations will help to clarify ideas when drawing sketches of Gn for n=1,2,3 in the same diagram. In particular, the sketch of G3 should make it clear that once x reaches the value 1 it remains there.
Model Solution
Part (i): n=1
The equation becomes dtdx=1−x, with x(0)=0.
Separate variables:
1−xdx=dt(x=1)
−ln∣1−x∣=t+C
At t=0, x=0: −ln1=C, so C=0.
−ln(1−x)=t⟹1−x=e−t⟹x=1−e−t
(valid for x<1, which holds for all finite t>0).
Sketch for n=1: The curve starts at the origin, rises steeply at first (gradient 1 at t=0), and approaches x=1 asymptotically as t→∞. It never actually reaches x=1.
Part (ii): Proving 1−x<(1−x2)1/2 for 0<x<1
Both sides are positive for 0<x<1, so squaring preserves the inequality. We need to show:
(1−x)2<1−x2
Expand the left side: 1−2x+x2.
So we need: 1−2x+x2<1−x2, i.e., 2x2−2x<0, i.e., 2x(x−1)<0.
Since 0<x<1, we have x>0 and x−1<0, so 2x(x−1)<0 ✓.
This is a valid proof: we started from 2x(x−1)<0 (true for 0<x<1) and derived (1−x)2<1−x2 by reversible algebraic steps, from which 1−x<(1−x2)1/2 follows since both sides are positive.
Solving for n=2:
The equation is dtdx=(1−x2)1/2 with x(0)=0.
Set x=siny, so dtdx=cosy⋅dtdy. Then:
cosy⋅dtdy=(1−sin2y)1/2=cosy
For 0<y<2π, cosy>0, so:
dtdy=1⟹y=t+C
At t=0, x=0, so siny=0, giving y=0 and C=0.
Therefore y=t, and x=sint.
Sketch for n=2:x=sint starts at the origin, rises more steeply than x=1−e−t (since (1−x2)1/2>1−x for 0<x<1), and reaches x=1 at t=2π. For t∈(0,2π), the curve x=sint lies above x=1−e−t.
Part (iii): Sketch for n=3
We are given that (1−x2)1/2<(1−x3)1/3 for 0<x<1.
This means dtdxn=3>dtdxn=2 for each x∈(0,1). So at any given x, the solution for n=3 has a larger gradient than for n=2.
Combined with part (ii), for 0<x<1:
gradient for n=11−x<gradient for n=2(1−x2)1/2<gradient for n=3(1−x3)1/3
Since the gradient is larger at every x, the solution x(t) for n=3 rises more steeply than for n=2, which rises more steeply than for n=1. Starting from the origin, the three curves are ordered: G1 (lowest), G2 (middle), G3 (highest) for t>0.
Since G2 reaches x=1 at t=2π, and G3 rises more steeply, G3 must reach x=1 at some value t∗<2π.
Once x=1, we have dtdx=(1−1n)1/n=0, so x stays at 1 for all t≥t∗. The graph of G3 is therefore a curve from the origin, rising steeply, reaching x=1 at t=t∗<2π, and then remaining at x=1 (a horizontal line) for t≥t∗.
Showing x=1 at a value less than 2π more formally:
The time to reach x=1 is t∗=∫01(1−x3)1/3dx. We need to show this is less than 2π=∫01(1−x2)1/2dx.
Since (1−x3)1/3>(1−x2)1/2 for 0<x<1, we have (1−x3)1/31<(1−x2)1/21 on this interval, so