Exam : STEP3 | Year : 2022 | Questions : Q1—Q8 | Total marks per question : 20
All questions are pure mathematics. Solutions and examiner commentary are included below.
Q Topic Difficulty Key Techniques 1 纯数 Standard 参数方程代入消元, 韦达定理, 对称多项式化简, 将四次方程倒数变换 2 纯数 Challenging 无穷递降法, 反证法, 模3/模2同余分析, 奇偶性分析, 平方剩余 3 纯数 Challenging 隐函数微分, 驻点条件推导, 四次方程根的分析, 联立方程消元 4 纯数 Challenging 数学归纳法, 麦克劳林展开求极限, 虚数代换, 几何级数指数化简 5 纯数 Standard 换元积分(u=-x), 奇偶函数分解, 微积分基本定理, 函数方程推理 6 纯数 Hard 三角函数小量展开, 参数方程构建, 周期性条件处理, 导数的几何解释 7 纯数 Challenging 向量叉积计算, 单位向量性质利用, Rodrigues旋转公式, 几何直觉与图示 8 纯数 Challenging De Moivre定理, 二项式展开, sec²θ-1=tan²θ代换, 奇偶性分析, 反证法
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Standard | Marks : 20
1 Let C 1 C_1 C 1 be the curve given by the parametric equations
x = c t , y = c t x = ct, \quad y = \frac{c}{t} x = c t , y = t c
where c > 0 c > 0 c > 0 and t ≠ 0 t \neq 0 t = 0 , and let C 2 C_2 C 2 be the circle
( x − a ) 2 + ( y − b ) 2 = r 2 . (x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2 . ( x − a ) 2 + ( y − b ) 2 = r 2 .
C 1 C_1 C 1 and C 2 C_2 C 2 intersect at the four points P i P_i P i (i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 i = 1, 2, 3, 4 i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ), and the corresponding values of the parameter t t t at these points are t i t_i t i .
(i) Show that t i t_i t i are the roots of the equation
c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) t 2 − 2 b c t + c 2 = 0. ( ∗ ) c^2t^4 - 2act^3 + (a^2 + b^2 - r^2)t^2 - 2bct + c^2 = 0 . \quad (*) c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) t 2 − 2 b c t + c 2 = 0. ( ∗ )
(ii) Show that
∑ i = 1 4 t i 2 = 2 c 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 ) \sum_{i=1}^4 t_i^2 = \frac{2}{c^2} (a^2 - b^2 + r^2) ∑ i = 1 4 t i 2 = c 2 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 )
(iii) Show that
the center of the circle C 2 C_2 C 2 lies on the line y = x y = x y = x if and only if t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = 1 t_1t_2t_3t_4 = 1 t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = 1 and t 1 + t 2 + t 3 + t 4 = 1 t 1 + 1 t 2 + 1 t 3 + 1 t 4 t_1 + t_2 + t_3 + t_4 = \frac{1}{t_1} + \frac{1}{t_2} + \frac{1}{t_3} + \frac{1}{t_4} t 1 + t 2 + t 3 + t 4 = t 1 1 + t 2 1 + t 3 1 + t 4 1 .
Hint
交点:( c t − a ) 2 + ( c t − b ) 2 = r 2 (ct-a)^2+(\frac{c}{t}-b)^2=r^2 ( c t − a ) 2 + ( t c − b ) 2 = r 2 。
展开乘 t 2 t^2 t 2 :c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) t 2 − 2 b c t + c 2 = 0 c^2t^4-2act^3+(a^2+b^2-r^2)t^2-2bct+c^2=0 c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) t 2 − 2 b c t + c 2 = 0 。
Vieta:∑ t i = 2 a c \sum t_i=\frac{2a}{c} ∑ t i = c 2 a ,∑ i < j t i t j = a 2 + b 2 − r 2 c 2 \sum_{i<j}t_it_j=\frac{a^2+b^2-r^2}{c^2} ∑ i < j t i t j = c 2 a 2 + b 2 − r 2 。
∑ t i 2 = ( 2 a c ) 2 − 2 ⋅ a 2 + b 2 − r 2 c 2 = 2 c 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 ) \sum t_i^2=(\frac{2a}{c})^2-2\cdot\frac{a^2+b^2-r^2}{c^2}=\frac{2}{c^2}(a^2-b^2+r^2) ∑ t i 2 = ( c 2 a ) 2 − 2 ⋅ c 2 a 2 + b 2 − r 2 = c 2 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 ) 。
交换 a ↔ b a\leftrightarrow b a ↔ b :∑ 1 t i 2 = 2 c 2 ( b 2 − a 2 + r 2 ) \sum\frac{1}{t_i^2}=\frac{2}{c^2}(b^2-a^2+r^2) ∑ t i 2 1 = c 2 2 ( b 2 − a 2 + r 2 ) 。
∑ O P i 2 = ∑ ( c 2 t i 2 + c 2 t i 2 ) = c 2 ( 2 c 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 ) + 2 c 2 ( b 2 − a 2 + r 2 ) ) = 4 r 2 \sum OP_i^2=\sum(c^2t_i^2+\frac{c^2}{t_i^2})=c^2(\frac{2}{c^2}(a^2-b^2+r^2)+\frac{2}{c^2}(b^2-a^2+r^2))=4r^2 ∑ O P i 2 = ∑ ( c 2 t i 2 + t i 2 c 2 ) = c 2 ( c 2 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 ) + c 2 2 ( b 2 − a 2 + r 2 )) = 4 r 2 。
两切点 ⟹ \implies ⟹ 两对重根 t 1 = t 3 , t 2 = t 4 t_1=t_3,t_2=t_4 t 1 = t 3 , t 2 = t 4 。
t 1 2 t 2 2 = 1 ⟹ t 1 t 2 = ± 1 t_1^2t_2^2=1 \implies t_1t_2=\pm 1 t 1 2 t 2 2 = 1 ⟹ t 1 t 2 = ± 1 。
Vieta:t 1 + t 2 = a c t_1+t_2=\frac{a}{c} t 1 + t 2 = c a ,t 1 t 2 ( t 1 + t 2 ) = b c ⟹ b a = ± 1 ⟹ a = ± b t_1t_2(t_1+t_2)=\frac{b}{c} \implies \frac{b}{a}=\pm 1 \implies a=\pm b t 1 t 2 ( t 1 + t 2 ) = c b ⟹ a b = ± 1 ⟹ a = ± b 。
圆心 ( a , ± a ) (a,\pm a) ( a , ± a ) 在 y = ± x y=\pm x y = ± x 上。
Model Solution
Part (i)
At an intersection point of C 1 C_1 C 1 and C 2 C_2 C 2 , the parametric coordinates satisfy the circle equation:
( c t − a ) 2 + ( c t − b ) 2 = r 2 (ct - a)^2 + \left(\frac{c}{t} - b\right)^2 = r^2 ( c t − a ) 2 + ( t c − b ) 2 = r 2
Expanding each squared term:
c 2 t 2 − 2 a c t + a 2 + c 2 t 2 − 2 b c t + b 2 = r 2 c^2t^2 - 2act + a^2 + \frac{c^2}{t^2} - \frac{2bc}{t} + b^2 = r^2 c 2 t 2 − 2 a c t + a 2 + t 2 c 2 − t 2 b c + b 2 = r 2
Multiplying both sides by t 2 t^2 t 2 (valid since t ≠ 0 t \neq 0 t = 0 ):
c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + a 2 t 2 + c 2 − 2 b c t + b 2 t 2 = r 2 t 2 c^2t^4 - 2act^3 + a^2t^2 + c^2 - 2bct + b^2t^2 = r^2t^2 c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + a 2 t 2 + c 2 − 2 b c t + b 2 t 2 = r 2 t 2
Collecting terms by powers of t t t :
c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) t 2 − 2 b c t + c 2 = 0 ( ∗ ) c^2t^4 - 2act^3 + (a^2 + b^2 - r^2)t^2 - 2bct + c^2 = 0 \qquad (*) c 2 t 4 − 2 a c t 3 + ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) t 2 − 2 b c t + c 2 = 0 ( ∗ )
Since the four intersection points P i P_i P i correspond to parameter values t i t_i t i , each t i t_i t i satisfies this equation, so the t i t_i t i are roots of ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) .
Part (ii)
By Vieta’s formulas applied to the quartic ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) with leading coefficient c 2 c^2 c 2 :
∑ i = 1 4 t i = 2 a c , ∑ 1 ⩽ i < j ⩽ 4 t i t j = a 2 + b 2 − r 2 c 2 \sum_{i=1}^4 t_i = \frac{2a}{c}, \qquad \sum_{1 \leqslant i < j \leqslant 4} t_it_j = \frac{a^2 + b^2 - r^2}{c^2} ∑ i = 1 4 t i = c 2 a , ∑ 1 ⩽ i < j ⩽ 4 t i t j = c 2 a 2 + b 2 − r 2
Using the identity ∑ t i 2 = ( ∑ t i ) 2 − 2 ∑ i < j t i t j \sum t_i^2 = \left(\sum t_i\right)^2 - 2\sum_{i<j} t_it_j ∑ t i 2 = ( ∑ t i ) 2 − 2 ∑ i < j t i t j :
∑ i = 1 4 t i 2 = ( 2 a c ) 2 − 2 ⋅ a 2 + b 2 − r 2 c 2 = 4 a 2 c 2 − 2 ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 ) c 2 \sum_{i=1}^4 t_i^2 = \left(\frac{2a}{c}\right)^2 - 2 \cdot \frac{a^2 + b^2 - r^2}{c^2} = \frac{4a^2}{c^2} - \frac{2(a^2 + b^2 - r^2)}{c^2} ∑ i = 1 4 t i 2 = ( c 2 a ) 2 − 2 ⋅ c 2 a 2 + b 2 − r 2 = c 2 4 a 2 − c 2 2 ( a 2 + b 2 − r 2 )
= 4 a 2 − 2 a 2 − 2 b 2 + 2 r 2 c 2 = 2 a 2 − 2 b 2 + 2 r 2 c 2 = 2 c 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 ) = \frac{4a^2 - 2a^2 - 2b^2 + 2r^2}{c^2} = \frac{2a^2 - 2b^2 + 2r^2}{c^2} = \frac{2}{c^2}(a^2 - b^2 + r^2) = c 2 4 a 2 − 2 a 2 − 2 b 2 + 2 r 2 = c 2 2 a 2 − 2 b 2 + 2 r 2 = c 2 2 ( a 2 − b 2 + r 2 )
Part (iii)
We need to show that a = b a = b a = b if and only if both conditions hold.
Direction 1 : Suppose a = b a = b a = b . Then the center of C 2 C_2 C 2 lies on y = x y = x y = x .
By Vieta’s formulas, the product of all four roots of ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) is:
t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = c 2 c 2 = 1 t_1t_2t_3t_4 = \frac{c^2}{c^2} = 1 t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = c 2 c 2 = 1
The sum of the reciprocals is:
∑ i = 1 4 1 t i = ∑ i < j < k t i t j t k t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = S 3 S 4 \sum_{i=1}^4 \frac{1}{t_i} = \frac{\sum_{i<j<k} t_it_jt_k}{t_1t_2t_3t_4} = \frac{S_3}{S_4} ∑ i = 1 4 t i 1 = t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 ∑ i < j < k t i t j t k = S 4 S 3
By Vieta’s formulas, S 3 = 2 b c c 2 = 2 b c S_3 = \frac{2bc}{c^2} = \frac{2b}{c} S 3 = c 2 2 b c = c 2 b and S 4 = 1 S_4 = 1 S 4 = 1 , so:
∑ i = 1 4 1 t i = 2 b c \sum_{i=1}^4 \frac{1}{t_i} = \frac{2b}{c} ∑ i = 1 4 t i 1 = c 2 b
Since a = b a = b a = b , we have ∑ t i = 2 a c = 2 b c = ∑ 1 t i \sum t_i = \frac{2a}{c} = \frac{2b}{c} = \sum \frac{1}{t_i} ∑ t i = c 2 a = c 2 b = ∑ t i 1 . Both conditions are satisfied.
Direction 2 : Suppose t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = 1 t_1t_2t_3t_4 = 1 t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = 1 and ∑ t i = ∑ 1 t i \sum t_i = \sum \frac{1}{t_i} ∑ t i = ∑ t i 1 . We show a = b a = b a = b .
From Vieta’s formulas:
t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = c 2 c 2 = 1 t_1t_2t_3t_4 = \frac{c^2}{c^2} = 1 t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 = c 2 c 2 = 1
This is automatically true (the constant term and leading coefficient of ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) are both c 2 c^2 c 2 ), so this condition holds regardless of a a a and b b b .
The condition ∑ t i = ∑ 1 t i \sum t_i = \sum \frac{1}{t_i} ∑ t i = ∑ t i 1 gives:
2 a c = 2 b c \frac{2a}{c} = \frac{2b}{c} c 2 a = c 2 b
Therefore a = b a = b a = b , so the center ( a , b ) (a, b) ( a , b ) of C 2 C_2 C 2 lies on y = x y = x y = x .
Examiner Notes
最受欢迎题目(94%考生选择),平均分约14/20。第(i)部分几乎全员正确。第(ii)部分求和符号书写不规范是主要扣分点,更高效的方法是将四次方程除以t⁴后与原方程比较。部分考生从(iii)反推,未获认可。第(iii)部分需注意利用(ii)的结果而非独立推导。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Challenging | Marks : 20
2 (i) Suppose that there are three non-zero integers a a a , b b b and c c c for which a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 a^3 + 2b^3 + 4c^3 = 0 a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 . Explain why there must exist an integer p p p , with ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ , such that 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 4p^3 + b^3 + 2c^3 = 0 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 , and show further that there must exist integers p p p , q q q and r r r , with ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ , ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ |q| < |b| ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ and ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ |r| < |c| ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ , such that p 3 + 2 q 3 + 4 r 3 = 0 p^3 + 2q^3 + 4r^3 = 0 p 3 + 2 q 3 + 4 r 3 = 0 . Deduce that no such integers a a a , b b b and c c c can exist.
(ii) Prove that there are no non-zero integers a a a , b b b and c c c for which 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 9a^3 + 10b^3 + 6c^3 = 0 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 .
(iii) By considering the expression ( 3 n ± 1 ) 2 (3n \pm 1)^2 ( 3 n ± 1 ) 2 , prove that, unless an integer is a multiple of three, its square is one more than a multiple of 3. Deduce that the sum of the squares of two integers can only be a multiple of three if each of the integers is a multiple of three.
Hence prove that there are no non-zero integers a a a , b b b and c c c for which a 2 + b 2 = 3 c 2 a^2 + b^2 = 3c^2 a 2 + b 2 = 3 c 2 .
(iv) Prove that there are no non-zero integers a a a , b b b and c c c for which a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 4 a b c a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 4abc a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 4 ab c .
Hint
a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 ⟹ a a^3+2b^3+4c^3=0 \implies a a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 ⟹ a 偶数,设 a = 2 p a=2p a = 2 p ,∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p|<|a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ 。
8 p 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 8p^3+2b^3+4c^3=0 \implies 4p^3+b^3+2c^3=0 8 p 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 。
同理 b = 2 q , c = 2 r b=2q,c=2r b = 2 q , c = 2 r ,得 p 3 + 2 q 3 + 4 r 3 = 0 p^3+2q^3+4r^3=0 p 3 + 2 q 3 + 4 r 3 = 0 。
无穷递降:不存在非零整数解。
9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 3 ∣ b 9a^3+10b^3+6c^3=0 \implies 3|b 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 3∣ b ,设 b = 3 q b=3q b = 3 q 。
9 a 3 + 270 q 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 3 ∣ c 9a^3+270q^3+6c^3=0 \implies 3a^3+90q^3+2c^3=0 \implies 3|c 9 a 3 + 270 q 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 ⟹ 3∣ c 。
同理 3 ∣ a 3|a 3∣ a ,设 a = 3 p a=3p a = 3 p :9 p 3 + 10 q 3 + 6 r 3 = 0 9p^3+10q^3+6r^3=0 9 p 3 + 10 q 3 + 6 r 3 = 0 。无穷递降。
平方模 3:n ≢ 0 ⟹ n 2 ≡ 1 n\not\equiv 0 \implies n^2\equiv 1 n ≡ 0 ⟹ n 2 ≡ 1 。a 2 + b 2 ≡ 0 ⟹ a , b a^2+b^2\equiv 0 \implies a,b a 2 + b 2 ≡ 0 ⟹ a , b 均为 3 的倍数。
设 a = 3 p , b = 3 q a=3p,b=3q a = 3 p , b = 3 q ,则 c = 3 r c=3r c = 3 r ,p 2 + q 2 = 3 r 2 p^2+q^2=3r^2 p 2 + q 2 = 3 r 2 。无穷递降。
a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 4 a b c a^2+b^2+c^2=4abc a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 4 ab c 。RHS ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) ⟹ a , b , c \equiv 0 \pmod 4 \implies a,b,c ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) ⟹ a , b , c 全偶。
设 a = 2 p , b = 2 q , c = 2 r a=2p,b=2q,c=2r a = 2 p , b = 2 q , c = 2 r :p 2 + q 2 + r 2 = 8 p q r p^2+q^2+r^2=8pqr p 2 + q 2 + r 2 = 8 pq r 。无穷递降。
Model Solution
Part (i)
Suppose for contradiction that non-zero integers a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c exist with a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 a^3 + 2b^3 + 4c^3 = 0 a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 .
Step 1 : Show a a a is even and produce p p p with ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ .
Since a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 a^3 + 2b^3 + 4c^3 = 0 a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 , we have a 3 = − 2 b 3 − 4 c 3 = − 2 ( b 3 + 2 c 3 ) a^3 = -2b^3 - 4c^3 = -2(b^3 + 2c^3) a 3 = − 2 b 3 − 4 c 3 = − 2 ( b 3 + 2 c 3 ) . The right side is even, so a 3 a^3 a 3 is even, hence a a a is even. Write a = 2 p a = 2p a = 2 p for some integer p p p .
Substituting: ( 2 p ) 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 (2p)^3 + 2b^3 + 4c^3 = 0 ( 2 p ) 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 , i.e., 8 p 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 8p^3 + 2b^3 + 4c^3 = 0 8 p 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 .
Dividing by 2:
4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 4p^3 + b^3 + 2c^3 = 0 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0
Since a ≠ 0 a \neq 0 a = 0 , we have p ≠ 0 p \neq 0 p = 0 , and ∣ p ∣ = ∣ a ∣ / 2 < ∣ a ∣ |p| = |a|/2 < |a| ∣ p ∣ = ∣ a ∣/2 < ∣ a ∣ (as ∣ a ∣ ⩾ 2 |a| \geqslant 2 ∣ a ∣ ⩾ 2 ).
Step 2 : Show b b b and c c c are also even, producing q , r q, r q , r with ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ |q| < |b| ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ , ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ |r| < |c| ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ .
From 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 4p^3 + b^3 + 2c^3 = 0 4 p 3 + b 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 , we get b 3 = − 4 p 3 − 2 c 3 = − 2 ( 2 p 3 + c 3 ) b^3 = -4p^3 - 2c^3 = -2(2p^3 + c^3) b 3 = − 4 p 3 − 2 c 3 = − 2 ( 2 p 3 + c 3 ) , so b 3 b^3 b 3 is even, hence b b b is even. Write b = 2 q b = 2q b = 2 q .
Substituting: 4 p 3 + 8 q 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 4p^3 + 8q^3 + 2c^3 = 0 4 p 3 + 8 q 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 , dividing by 2: 2 p 3 + 4 q 3 + c 3 = 0 2p^3 + 4q^3 + c^3 = 0 2 p 3 + 4 q 3 + c 3 = 0 .
So c 3 = − 2 p 3 − 4 q 3 = − 2 ( p 3 + 2 q 3 ) c^3 = -2p^3 - 4q^3 = -2(p^3 + 2q^3) c 3 = − 2 p 3 − 4 q 3 = − 2 ( p 3 + 2 q 3 ) , hence c c c is even. Write c = 2 r c = 2r c = 2 r .
Substituting: 2 p 3 + 4 q 3 + 8 r 3 = 0 2p^3 + 4q^3 + 8r^3 = 0 2 p 3 + 4 q 3 + 8 r 3 = 0 , dividing by 2:
p 3 + 2 q 3 + 4 r 3 = 0 p^3 + 2q^3 + 4r^3 = 0 p 3 + 2 q 3 + 4 r 3 = 0
We have ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ , ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ |q| < |b| ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ , ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ |r| < |c| ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ , and ( p , q , r ) (p, q, r) ( p , q , r ) satisfies the same equation as ( a , b , c ) (a, b, c) ( a , b , c ) .
Step 3 : Deduction by infinite descent.
Starting from any non-zero solution ( a , b , c ) (a, b, c) ( a , b , c ) , we produce a new non-zero solution ( p , q , r ) (p, q, r) ( p , q , r ) with strictly smaller absolute values. Repeating this process produces an infinite strictly decreasing sequence of positive integers ∣ a ∣ > ∣ p ∣ > ⋯ > 0 |a| > |p| > \cdots > 0 ∣ a ∣ > ∣ p ∣ > ⋯ > 0 . This is impossible since the positive integers are well-ordered (every non-empty set of positive integers has a least element). Therefore no non-zero integers a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c with a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 a^3 + 2b^3 + 4c^3 = 0 a 3 + 2 b 3 + 4 c 3 = 0 can exist.
Part (ii)
Suppose for contradiction that non-zero integers a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c exist with 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 9a^3 + 10b^3 + 6c^3 = 0 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 .
Step 1 : Show 3 ∣ b 3 \mid b 3 ∣ b .
Reducing modulo 3: 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 ≡ 0 + b 3 + 0 ≡ b 3 ( m o d 3 ) 9a^3 + 10b^3 + 6c^3 \equiv 0 + b^3 + 0 \equiv b^3 \pmod{3} 9 a 3 + 10 b 3 + 6 c 3 ≡ 0 + b 3 + 0 ≡ b 3 ( mod 3 ) .
Since the left side equals 0, we need b 3 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) b^3 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} b 3 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) , so 3 ∣ b 3 \mid b 3 ∣ b . Write b = 3 q b = 3q b = 3 q .
Substituting: 9 a 3 + 10 ( 27 q 3 ) + 6 c 3 = 0 9a^3 + 10(27q^3) + 6c^3 = 0 9 a 3 + 10 ( 27 q 3 ) + 6 c 3 = 0 , i.e., 9 a 3 + 270 q 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 9a^3 + 270q^3 + 6c^3 = 0 9 a 3 + 270 q 3 + 6 c 3 = 0 .
Dividing by 3: 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 3a^3 + 90q^3 + 2c^3 = 0 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 2 c 3 = 0 .
Step 2 : Show 3 ∣ c 3 \mid c 3 ∣ c .
Reducing modulo 3: 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 2 c 3 ≡ 0 + 0 + 2 c 3 ≡ 2 c 3 ( m o d 3 ) 3a^3 + 90q^3 + 2c^3 \equiv 0 + 0 + 2c^3 \equiv 2c^3 \pmod{3} 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 2 c 3 ≡ 0 + 0 + 2 c 3 ≡ 2 c 3 ( mod 3 ) .
Since the left side equals 0, we need 2 c 3 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) 2c^3 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} 2 c 3 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) , hence c 3 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) c^3 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} c 3 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) (as gcd ( 2 , 3 ) = 1 \gcd(2, 3) = 1 g cd( 2 , 3 ) = 1 ), so 3 ∣ c 3 \mid c 3 ∣ c . Write c = 3 r c = 3r c = 3 r .
Substituting: 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 54 r 3 = 0 3a^3 + 90q^3 + 54r^3 = 0 3 a 3 + 90 q 3 + 54 r 3 = 0 . Dividing by 3: a 3 + 30 q 3 + 18 r 3 = 0 a^3 + 30q^3 + 18r^3 = 0 a 3 + 30 q 3 + 18 r 3 = 0 .
Step 3 : Show 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a .
Reducing modulo 3: a 3 + 30 q 3 + 18 r 3 ≡ a 3 ( m o d 3 ) a^3 + 30q^3 + 18r^3 \equiv a^3 \pmod{3} a 3 + 30 q 3 + 18 r 3 ≡ a 3 ( mod 3 ) .
Since the left side equals 0, a 3 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) a^3 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} a 3 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) , so 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a . Write a = 3 p a = 3p a = 3 p .
Substituting: 27 p 3 + 30 q 3 + 18 r 3 = 0 27p^3 + 30q^3 + 18r^3 = 0 27 p 3 + 30 q 3 + 18 r 3 = 0 . Dividing by 3:
9 p 3 + 10 q 3 + 6 r 3 = 0 9p^3 + 10q^3 + 6r^3 = 0 9 p 3 + 10 q 3 + 6 r 3 = 0
Step 4 : Infinite descent.
We have a new solution ( p , q , r ) (p, q, r) ( p , q , r ) satisfying the same equation, with ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ , ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ |q| < |b| ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ , ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ |r| < |c| ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ . By the same infinite descent argument as part (i), no non-zero solution can exist.
Part (iii)
Step 1 : Show that if n n n is not a multiple of 3, then n 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 ) n^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{3} n 2 ≡ 1 ( mod 3 ) .
If n n n is not a multiple of 3, then n = 3 k + 1 n = 3k + 1 n = 3 k + 1 or n = 3 k − 1 n = 3k - 1 n = 3 k − 1 for some integer k k k .
Case 1: n = 3 k + 1 n = 3k + 1 n = 3 k + 1 . Then n 2 = 9 k 2 + 6 k + 1 = 3 ( 3 k 2 + 2 k ) + 1 ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 ) n^2 = 9k^2 + 6k + 1 = 3(3k^2 + 2k) + 1 \equiv 1 \pmod{3} n 2 = 9 k 2 + 6 k + 1 = 3 ( 3 k 2 + 2 k ) + 1 ≡ 1 ( mod 3 ) .
Case 2: n = 3 k − 1 n = 3k - 1 n = 3 k − 1 . Then n 2 = 9 k 2 − 6 k + 1 = 3 ( 3 k 2 − 2 k ) + 1 ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 ) n^2 = 9k^2 - 6k + 1 = 3(3k^2 - 2k) + 1 \equiv 1 \pmod{3} n 2 = 9 k 2 − 6 k + 1 = 3 ( 3 k 2 − 2 k ) + 1 ≡ 1 ( mod 3 ) .
In both cases, n 2 n^2 n 2 is one more than a multiple of 3.
Step 2 : Deduce that a 2 + b 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 + b^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} a 2 + b 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) implies 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a and 3 ∣ b 3 \mid b 3 ∣ b .
The possible values of a 2 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 \pmod{3} a 2 ( mod 3 ) and b 2 ( m o d 3 ) b^2 \pmod{3} b 2 ( mod 3 ) are:
If 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a : a 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} a 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) .
If 3 ∤ a 3 \nmid a 3 ∤ a : a 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{3} a 2 ≡ 1 ( mod 3 ) (by Step 1).
So a 2 + b 2 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 + b^2 \pmod{3} a 2 + b 2 ( mod 3 ) can be 0 0 0 , 1 1 1 , or 2 2 2 :
a ( m o d 3 ) a \pmod{3} a ( mod 3 ) b ( m o d 3 ) b \pmod{3} b ( mod 3 ) a 2 + b 2 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 + b^2 \pmod{3} a 2 + b 2 ( mod 3 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ≠ 0 \neq 0 = 0 1 1 1 ≠ 0 \neq 0 = 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 ≠ 0 \neq 0 = 0 ≠ 0 \neq 0 = 0 2 2 2
Therefore a 2 + b 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) a^2 + b^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} a 2 + b 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) only when 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a and 3 ∣ b 3 \mid b 3 ∣ b .
Step 3 : Prove no non-zero integers satisfy a 2 + b 2 = 3 c 2 a^2 + b^2 = 3c^2 a 2 + b 2 = 3 c 2 .
Suppose for contradiction that non-zero integers a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c exist with a 2 + b 2 = 3 c 2 a^2 + b^2 = 3c^2 a 2 + b 2 = 3 c 2 .
Since 3 c 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) 3c^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{3} 3 c 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) , by Step 2, 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a and 3 ∣ b 3 \mid b 3 ∣ b . Write a = 3 p a = 3p a = 3 p , b = 3 q b = 3q b = 3 q .
Substituting: 9 p 2 + 9 q 2 = 3 c 2 9p^2 + 9q^2 = 3c^2 9 p 2 + 9 q 2 = 3 c 2 , so 3 ( p 2 + q 2 ) = c 2 3(p^2 + q^2) = c^2 3 ( p 2 + q 2 ) = c 2 .
This means 3 ∣ c 2 3 \mid c^2 3 ∣ c 2 , and since 3 is prime, 3 ∣ c 3 \mid c 3 ∣ c . Write c = 3 r c = 3r c = 3 r .
Substituting: 3 ( p 2 + q 2 ) = 9 r 2 3(p^2 + q^2) = 9r^2 3 ( p 2 + q 2 ) = 9 r 2 , so p 2 + q 2 = 3 r 2 p^2 + q^2 = 3r^2 p 2 + q 2 = 3 r 2 .
We have a new solution ( p , q , r ) (p, q, r) ( p , q , r ) satisfying the same equation, with ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ , ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ |q| < |b| ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ , ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ |r| < |c| ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ . By infinite descent, no non-zero solution can exist.
Part (iv)
Suppose for contradiction that non-zero integers a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c exist with a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 4 a b c a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 4abc a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 4 ab c .
Step 1 : Show a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c are all even.
Since 4 a b c 4abc 4 ab c is divisible by 4, we need a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{4} a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) .
The square of any integer satisfies ( 2 k ) 2 = 4 k 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) (2k)^2 = 4k^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{4} ( 2 k ) 2 = 4 k 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) and ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 = 4 k 2 + 4 k + 1 ≡ 1 ( m o d 4 ) (2k+1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 \equiv 1 \pmod{4} ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 = 4 k 2 + 4 k + 1 ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) . So a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ( m o d 4 ) a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \pmod{4} a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ( mod 4 ) equals the number of odd values among a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c .
We check each case:
All three odd : a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 3 ( m o d 4 ) a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \equiv 3 \pmod{4} a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 3 ( mod 4 ) . But 4 a b c ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) 4abc \equiv 0 \pmod{4} 4 ab c ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) . So 3 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) 3 \equiv 0 \pmod{4} 3 ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) , contradiction.
Exactly two odd : a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 2 ( m o d 4 ) a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \equiv 2 \pmod{4} a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 2 ( mod 4 ) . But 4 a b c 4abc 4 ab c is divisible by 4. So 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) 2 \equiv 0 \pmod{4} 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) , contradiction.
Exactly one odd : a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d 4 ) a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{4} a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) . But 4 a b c ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) 4abc \equiv 0 \pmod{4} 4 ab c ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) . So 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) 1 \equiv 0 \pmod{4} 1 ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) , contradiction.
All three even : a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{4} a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≡ 0 ( mod 4 ) . This is consistent.
Therefore a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c must all be even.
Step 2 : Infinite descent.
Write a = 2 p a = 2p a = 2 p , b = 2 q b = 2q b = 2 q , c = 2 r c = 2r c = 2 r . Substituting:
4 p 2 + 4 q 2 + 4 r 2 = 4 ( 2 p ) ( 2 q ) ( 2 r ) = 32 p q r 4p^2 + 4q^2 + 4r^2 = 4(2p)(2q)(2r) = 32pqr 4 p 2 + 4 q 2 + 4 r 2 = 4 ( 2 p ) ( 2 q ) ( 2 r ) = 32 pq r
Dividing by 4:
p 2 + q 2 + r 2 = 8 p q r p^2 + q^2 + r^2 = 8pqr p 2 + q 2 + r 2 = 8 pq r
This equation has the same form as the original (a sum of three squares equals a constant times the product). We have ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ |p| < |a| ∣ p ∣ < ∣ a ∣ , ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ |q| < |b| ∣ q ∣ < ∣ b ∣ , ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ |r| < |c| ∣ r ∣ < ∣ c ∣ .
By the same infinite descent argument, no non-zero solution can exist. ■ \blacksquare ■
Examiner Notes
仅约半数考生尝试,平均分9/20。主要问题在于逻辑表述不清——“可以无限继续”或”模不断减小”的论述不够严谨,必须明确解释为什么整数性导致矛盾。第(ii)部分关键是利用模3分析。第(iv)部分出乎意料地需要更精巧的论证(非简单复制(i)的结构),许多考生在此受阻。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Challenging | Marks : 20
3 (i) The curve C 1 C_1 C 1 has equation
a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 = 1 ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 = 1 a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 = 1
where a b c ≠ 0 abc \neq 0 ab c = 0 and a > 0 a > 0 a > 0 .
Show that, if the curve has two stationary points, then b 2 < 4 a c b^2 < 4ac b 2 < 4 a c .
(ii) The curve C 2 C_2 C 2 has equation
a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ay^3 + bx^2y + cx = 1 a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1
where a b c ≠ 0 abc \neq 0 ab c = 0 and b > 0 b > 0 b > 0 .
Show that the x x x -coordinates of stationary points on this curve satisfy
4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 = 0. 4cb^3x^4 - 8b^3x^3 - ac^3 = 0. 4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 = 0.
Show that, if the curve has two stationary points, then 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 4ac^6 + 27b^3 > 0 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 .
(iii) Consider the simultaneous equations
a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ay^3 + bx^2y + cx = 1 a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1
2 b x y + c = 0 2bxy + c = 0 2 b x y + c = 0
3 a y 2 + b x 2 = 0 3ay^2 + bx^2 = 0 3 a y 2 + b x 2 = 0
where a b c ≠ 0 abc \neq 0 ab c = 0 and b > 0 b > 0 b > 0 .
Show that, if these simultaneous equations have a solution, then 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 = 0 4ac^6 + 27b^3 = 0 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 = 0 .
Hint
a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 = 1 ax^2+bxy+cy^2=1 a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 = 1 。隐函数求导:2 a x + b y + b x y ′ + 2 c y y ′ = 0 2ax+by+bx y'+2cy y'=0 2 a x + b y + b x y ′ + 2 cy y ′ = 0 。
驻点 y ′ = 0 ⟹ b y = − 2 a x y'=0 \implies by=-2ax y ′ = 0 ⟹ b y = − 2 a x 。
原方程乘 b 2 b^2 b 2 :a b 2 x 2 + b 3 x y + b 2 c y 2 = b 2 ab^2x^2+b^3xy+b^2cy^2=b^2 a b 2 x 2 + b 3 x y + b 2 c y 2 = b 2 。
代入 b y = − 2 a x by=-2ax b y = − 2 a x :a b 2 x 2 − 2 a b 2 x 2 + 4 a 2 c x 2 = b 2 ⟹ a ( 4 a c − b 2 ) x 2 = b 2 ab^2x^2-2ab^2x^2+4a^2cx^2=b^2 \implies a(4ac-b^2)x^2=b^2 a b 2 x 2 − 2 a b 2 x 2 + 4 a 2 c x 2 = b 2 ⟹ a ( 4 a c − b 2 ) x 2 = b 2 。
b 2 > 0 , a > 0 ⟹ 4 a c − b 2 > 0 ⟹ b 2 < 4 a c b^2>0,a>0 \implies 4ac-b^2>0 \implies b^2<4ac b 2 > 0 , a > 0 ⟹ 4 a c − b 2 > 0 ⟹ b 2 < 4 a c 。
a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ay^3+bx^2y+cx=1 a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 。3 a y 2 y ′ + 2 b x y + b x 2 y ′ + c = 0 3ay^2 y'+2bxy+bx^2 y'+c=0 3 a y 2 y ′ + 2 b x y + b x 2 y ′ + c = 0 。
驻点 2 b x y = − c 2bxy=-c 2 b x y = − c 。
原方程乘 8 b 3 x 3 8b^3x^3 8 b 3 x 3 :8 a b 3 x 3 y 3 + 8 b 4 x 5 y + 8 b 3 c x 4 = 8 b 3 x 3 8ab^3x^3y^3+8b^4x^5y+8b^3cx^4=8b^3x^3 8 a b 3 x 3 y 3 + 8 b 4 x 5 y + 8 b 3 c x 4 = 8 b 3 x 3 。
( 2 b x y ) 3 = − c 3 ⟹ − a c 3 − 4 c b 3 x 4 + 8 c b 3 x 4 = 8 b 3 x 3 ⟹ 4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 = 0 (2bxy)^3=-c^3 \implies -ac^3-4cb^3x^4+8cb^3x^4=8b^3x^3 \implies 4cb^3x^4-8b^3x^3-ac^3=0 ( 2 b x y ) 3 = − c 3 ⟹ − a c 3 − 4 c b 3 x 4 + 8 c b 3 x 4 = 8 b 3 x 3 ⟹ 4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 = 0 。
f ′ ( x ) = 8 b 3 x 2 ( 2 c x − 3 ) = 0 f'(x)=8b^3x^2(2cx-3)=0 f ′ ( x ) = 8 b 3 x 2 ( 2 c x − 3 ) = 0 ,极值 x = 3 2 c x=\frac{3}{2c} x = 2 c 3 。
f ( 3 2 c ) < 0 f(\frac{3}{2c})<0 f ( 2 c 3 ) < 0 (或 > 0 >0 > 0 ) ⟹ 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 \implies 4ac^6+27b^3>0 ⟹ 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 。
联立三方程。3 a y 2 + b x 2 = 0 ⟹ a < 0 3ay^2+bx^2=0 \implies a<0 3 a y 2 + b x 2 = 0 ⟹ a < 0 。
2 b x y = − c 2bxy=-c 2 b x y = − c ,乘 4 b y 2 4by^2 4 b y 2 :12 a b y 4 + c 2 = 0 ⟹ y 4 = − c 2 12 a b 12aby^4+c^2=0 \implies y^4=\frac{-c^2}{12ab} 12 ab y 4 + c 2 = 0 ⟹ y 4 = 12 ab − c 2 。
原方程乘 y y y :a y 4 + b x 2 y 2 + c x y = y ay^4+bx^2y^2+cxy=y a y 4 + b x 2 y 2 + c x y = y 。
a y 4 = − c 2 12 b ay^4=\frac{-c^2}{12b} a y 4 = 12 b − c 2 ,b x 2 y 2 = c 2 4 b bx^2y^2=\frac{c^2}{4b} b x 2 y 2 = 4 b c 2 ,c x y = − c 2 2 b cxy=\frac{-c^2}{2b} c x y = 2 b − c 2 。
y = − c 2 3 b y=\frac{-c^2}{3b} y = 3 b − c 2 。y 4 = ( − c 2 3 b ) 4 = − c 2 12 a b ⟹ 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 = 0 y^4=(\frac{-c^2}{3b})^4=\frac{-c^2}{12ab} \implies 4ac^6+27b^3=0 y 4 = ( 3 b − c 2 ) 4 = 12 ab − c 2 ⟹ 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 = 0 。
Model Solution
Part (i)
We differentiate a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 = 1 ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 = 1 a x 2 + b x y + c y 2 = 1 implicitly with respect to x x x :
2 a x + b y + b x d y d x + 2 c y d y d x = 0 2ax + by + bx\frac{dy}{dx} + 2cy\frac{dy}{dx} = 0 2 a x + b y + b x d x d y + 2 cy d x d y = 0
At a stationary point, d y d x = 0 \frac{dy}{dx} = 0 d x d y = 0 , so:
2 a x + b y = 0 i.e. b y = − 2 a x ⋯ ( ∗ ) 2ax + by = 0 \qquad \text{i.e.} \quad by = -2ax \qquad \cdots (*) 2 a x + b y = 0 i.e. b y = − 2 a x ⋯ ( ∗ )
We substitute b y = − 2 a x by = -2ax b y = − 2 a x into the original equation. Multiply the original equation by b 2 b^2 b 2 :
a b 2 x 2 + b 3 x y + b 2 c y 2 = b 2 ab^2x^2 + b^3xy + b^2cy^2 = b^2 a b 2 x 2 + b 3 x y + b 2 c y 2 = b 2
Using b y = − 2 a x by = -2ax b y = − 2 a x , we get b 3 x y = b 2 ( b x y ) = b 2 ( − 2 a x 2 ) = − 2 a b 2 x 2 b^3xy = b^2(bxy) = b^2(-2ax^2) = -2ab^2x^2 b 3 x y = b 2 ( b x y ) = b 2 ( − 2 a x 2 ) = − 2 a b 2 x 2 and b 2 c y 2 = c ( b y ) 2 = c ⋅ 4 a 2 x 2 = 4 a 2 c x 2 b^2cy^2 = c(by)^2 = c \cdot 4a^2x^2 = 4a^2cx^2 b 2 c y 2 = c ( b y ) 2 = c ⋅ 4 a 2 x 2 = 4 a 2 c x 2 . Substituting:
a b 2 x 2 − 2 a b 2 x 2 + 4 a 2 c x 2 = b 2 ab^2x^2 - 2ab^2x^2 + 4a^2cx^2 = b^2 a b 2 x 2 − 2 a b 2 x 2 + 4 a 2 c x 2 = b 2
a ( 4 a c − b 2 ) x 2 = b 2 ⋯ ( ∗ ∗ ) a(4ac - b^2)x^2 = b^2 \qquad \cdots (**) a ( 4 a c − b 2 ) x 2 = b 2 ⋯ ( ∗ ∗ )
Since a > 0 a > 0 a > 0 and b 2 > 0 b^2 > 0 b 2 > 0 , equation ( ∗ ∗ ) (**) ( ∗ ∗ ) requires 4 a c − b 2 > 0 4ac - b^2 > 0 4 a c − b 2 > 0 for real solutions x x x to exist. If 4 a c − b 2 ≤ 0 4ac - b^2 \leq 0 4 a c − b 2 ≤ 0 , the left-hand side is non-positive while the right-hand side is positive, a contradiction.
Therefore, if the curve has stationary points, b 2 < 4 a c b^2 < 4ac b 2 < 4 a c . ■ \blacksquare ■
Part (ii)
We differentiate a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ay^3 + bx^2y + cx = 1 a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 implicitly:
3 a y 2 d y d x + 2 b x y + b x 2 d y d x + c = 0 3ay^2\frac{dy}{dx} + 2bxy + bx^2\frac{dy}{dx} + c = 0 3 a y 2 d x d y + 2 b x y + b x 2 d x d y + c = 0
At a stationary point, d y d x = 0 \frac{dy}{dx} = 0 d x d y = 0 :
2 b x y + c = 0 ⋯ ( ∗ ) 2bxy + c = 0 \qquad \cdots (*) 2 b x y + c = 0 ⋯ ( ∗ )
From ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) : y = − c 2 b x y = \frac{-c}{2bx} y = 2 b x − c (note x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0 since c ≠ 0 c \neq 0 c = 0 ). Substituting into the original equation a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ay^3 + bx^2y + cx = 1 a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 :
a ( − c 2 b x ) 3 + b x 2 ⋅ − c 2 b x + c x = 1 a\left(\frac{-c}{2bx}\right)^3 + bx^2 \cdot \frac{-c}{2bx} + cx = 1 a ( 2 b x − c ) 3 + b x 2 ⋅ 2 b x − c + c x = 1
− a c 3 8 b 3 x 3 − c x 2 + c x = 1 \frac{-ac^3}{8b^3x^3} - \frac{cx}{2} + cx = 1 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 − 2 c x + c x = 1
− a c 3 8 b 3 x 3 + c x 2 = 1 \frac{-ac^3}{8b^3x^3} + \frac{cx}{2} = 1 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 + 2 c x = 1
Multiply through by 8 b 3 x 3 8b^3x^3 8 b 3 x 3 :
− a c 3 + 4 c b 3 x 4 = 8 b 3 x 3 -ac^3 + 4cb^3x^4 = 8b^3x^3 − a c 3 + 4 c b 3 x 4 = 8 b 3 x 3
4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 = 0 ■ 4cb^3x^4 - 8b^3x^3 - ac^3 = 0 \qquad \blacksquare 4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 = 0 ■
Now we show that if the curve has two stationary points, then 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 4ac^6 + 27b^3 > 0 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 .
Let f ( x ) = 4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 f(x) = 4cb^3x^4 - 8b^3x^3 - ac^3 f ( x ) = 4 c b 3 x 4 − 8 b 3 x 3 − a c 3 . The stationary points of the curve correspond to roots of f ( x ) = 0 f(x) = 0 f ( x ) = 0 .
Compute f ′ ( x ) = 16 c b 3 x 3 − 24 b 3 x 2 = 8 b 3 x 2 ( 2 c x − 3 ) f'(x) = 16cb^3x^3 - 24b^3x^2 = 8b^3x^2(2cx - 3) f ′ ( x ) = 16 c b 3 x 3 − 24 b 3 x 2 = 8 b 3 x 2 ( 2 c x − 3 ) .
Since b > 0 b > 0 b > 0 , f ′ ( x ) = 0 f'(x) = 0 f ′ ( x ) = 0 at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 (double root) and x = 3 2 c x = \frac{3}{2c} x = 2 c 3 .
Because x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 is a double root of f ′ f' f ′ , it is an inflection point of f f f , not a local extremum. The only extremum of f f f is at x = 3 2 c x = \frac{3}{2c} x = 2 c 3 .
Evaluate:
f ( 3 2 c ) = 4 c b 3 ⋅ 81 16 c 4 − 8 b 3 ⋅ 27 8 c 3 − a c 3 = 81 b 3 4 c 3 − 27 b 3 c 3 − a c 3 = − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) 4 c 3 f\!\left(\frac{3}{2c}\right) = 4cb^3 \cdot \frac{81}{16c^4} - 8b^3 \cdot \frac{27}{8c^3} - ac^3 = \frac{81b^3}{4c^3} - \frac{27b^3}{c^3} - ac^3 = \frac{-(4ac^6 + 27b^3)}{4c^3} f ( 2 c 3 ) = 4 c b 3 ⋅ 16 c 4 81 − 8 b 3 ⋅ 8 c 3 27 − a c 3 = 4 c 3 81 b 3 − c 3 27 b 3 − a c 3 = 4 c 3 − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 )
Also f ( 0 ) = − a c 3 f(0) = -ac^3 f ( 0 ) = − a c 3 . The leading coefficient of f f f is 4 c b 3 4cb^3 4 c b 3 , so f ( x ) → + ∞ f(x) \to +\infty f ( x ) → + ∞ as x → ± ∞ x \to \pm\infty x → ± ∞ when c > 0 c > 0 c > 0 , and f ( x ) → − ∞ f(x) \to -\infty f ( x ) → − ∞ as x → ± ∞ x \to \pm\infty x → ± ∞ when c < 0 c < 0 c < 0 .
For f ( x ) = 0 f(x) = 0 f ( x ) = 0 to have exactly two real roots (corresponding to two stationary points), the unique extremum must be on the opposite side of the x x x -axis from the end behaviour.
If c > 0 c > 0 c > 0 : f → + ∞ f \to +\infty f → + ∞ at both ends. Two roots requires f ( 3 2 c ) < 0 f\!\left(\frac{3}{2c}\right) < 0 f ( 2 c 3 ) < 0 , i.e. − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) 4 c 3 < 0 \frac{-(4ac^6 + 27b^3)}{4c^3} < 0 4 c 3 − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) < 0 . Since 4 c 3 > 0 4c^3 > 0 4 c 3 > 0 , this gives 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 4ac^6 + 27b^3 > 0 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 .
If c < 0 c < 0 c < 0 : f → − ∞ f \to -\infty f → − ∞ at both ends. Two roots requires f ( 3 2 c ) > 0 f\!\left(\frac{3}{2c}\right) > 0 f ( 2 c 3 ) > 0 , i.e. − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) 4 c 3 > 0 \frac{-(4ac^6 + 27b^3)}{4c^3} > 0 4 c 3 − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) > 0 . Since 4 c 3 < 0 4c^3 < 0 4 c 3 < 0 , we need − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) < 0 -(4ac^6 + 27b^3) < 0 − ( 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 ) < 0 , which again gives 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 4ac^6 + 27b^3 > 0 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 .
In both cases, two stationary points requires 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 4ac^6 + 27b^3 > 0 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 > 0 . ■ \blacksquare ■
Part (iii)
We have the simultaneous equations:
a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ⋯ ( 1 ) ay^3 + bx^2y + cx = 1 \qquad \cdots (1) a y 3 + b x 2 y + c x = 1 ⋯ ( 1 )
2 b x y + c = 0 ⋯ ( 2 ) 2bxy + c = 0 \qquad \cdots (2) 2 b x y + c = 0 ⋯ ( 2 )
3 a y 2 + b x 2 = 0 ⋯ ( 3 ) 3ay^2 + bx^2 = 0 \qquad \cdots (3) 3 a y 2 + b x 2 = 0 ⋯ ( 3 )
From ( 3 ) (3) ( 3 ) : b x 2 = − 3 a y 2 bx^2 = -3ay^2 b x 2 = − 3 a y 2 . Since b > 0 b > 0 b > 0 , this requires a < 0 a < 0 a < 0 .
From ( 2 ) (2) ( 2 ) : x = − c 2 b y x = \frac{-c}{2by} x = 2 b y − c . Squaring: x 2 = c 2 4 b 2 y 2 x^2 = \frac{c^2}{4b^2y^2} x 2 = 4 b 2 y 2 c 2 . Substituting into ( 3 ) (3) ( 3 ) :
3 a y 2 + c 2 4 b y 2 = 0 3ay^2 + \frac{c^2}{4by^2} = 0 3 a y 2 + 4 b y 2 c 2 = 0
Multiply by 4 b y 2 4by^2 4 b y 2 :
12 a b y 4 + c 2 = 0 ⋯ ( 4 ) 12aby^4 + c^2 = 0 \qquad \cdots (4) 12 ab y 4 + c 2 = 0 ⋯ ( 4 )
Now multiply equation ( 1 ) (1) ( 1 ) by y y y :
a y 4 + b x 2 y 2 + c x y = y ay^4 + bx^2y^2 + cxy = y a y 4 + b x 2 y 2 + c x y = y
Using b x 2 = − 3 a y 2 bx^2 = -3ay^2 b x 2 = − 3 a y 2 (from ( 3 ) (3) ( 3 ) ), we get b x 2 y 2 = − 3 a y 4 bx^2y^2 = -3ay^4 b x 2 y 2 = − 3 a y 4 .
From ( 2 ) (2) ( 2 ) : 2 b x y = − c 2bxy = -c 2 b x y = − c , so c x y = c ⋅ − c 2 b = − c 2 2 b cxy = c \cdot \frac{-c}{2b} = \frac{-c^2}{2b} c x y = c ⋅ 2 b − c = 2 b − c 2 .
Substituting:
a y 4 − 3 a y 4 − c 2 2 b = y ay^4 - 3ay^4 - \frac{c^2}{2b} = y a y 4 − 3 a y 4 − 2 b c 2 = y
− 2 a y 4 − c 2 2 b = y -2ay^4 - \frac{c^2}{2b} = y − 2 a y 4 − 2 b c 2 = y
From ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) : a y 4 = − c 2 12 b ay^4 = \frac{-c^2}{12b} a y 4 = 12 b − c 2 , so − 2 a y 4 = c 2 6 b -2ay^4 = \frac{c^2}{6b} − 2 a y 4 = 6 b c 2 .
c 2 6 b − c 2 2 b = y \frac{c^2}{6b} - \frac{c^2}{2b} = y 6 b c 2 − 2 b c 2 = y
y = c 2 − 3 c 2 6 b = − c 2 3 b ⋯ ( 5 ) y = \frac{c^2 - 3c^2}{6b} = \frac{-c^2}{3b} \qquad \cdots (5) y = 6 b c 2 − 3 c 2 = 3 b − c 2 ⋯ ( 5 )
Substitute ( 5 ) (5) ( 5 ) into ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) :
12 a b ⋅ ( − c 2 3 b ) 4 + c 2 = 0 12ab \cdot \left(\frac{-c^2}{3b}\right)^4 + c^2 = 0 12 ab ⋅ ( 3 b − c 2 ) 4 + c 2 = 0
12 a b ⋅ c 8 81 b 4 + c 2 = 0 12ab \cdot \frac{c^8}{81b^4} + c^2 = 0 12 ab ⋅ 81 b 4 c 8 + c 2 = 0
4 a c 8 27 b 3 + c 2 = 0 \frac{4ac^8}{27b^3} + c^2 = 0 27 b 3 4 a c 8 + c 2 = 0
Divide by c 2 c^2 c 2 (valid since c ≠ 0 c \neq 0 c = 0 ):
4 a c 6 27 b 3 + 1 = 0 \frac{4ac^6}{27b^3} + 1 = 0 27 b 3 4 a c 6 + 1 = 0
4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 = 0 ■ 4ac^6 + 27b^3 = 0 \qquad \blacksquare 4 a c 6 + 27 b 3 = 0 ■
Examiner Notes
超过90%考生尝试但平均分仅约5.5/20,是高尝试率中得分最低的题目。常见错误:错误假设两个驻点是重根、未考虑c<0的情况、对四次方程在驻点处取值符号的错误断言。值得注意的是,第(iii)部分通过直接消元求解方程组的考生反而比试图联系(ii)结果的考生表现更好。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Challenging | Marks : 20
4 You may assume that all infinite sums and products in this question converge.
(i) Prove by induction that for all positive integers n n n ,
sinh x = 2 n cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) sinh ( x 2 n ) \sinh x = 2^n \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \cosh \left( \frac{x}{4} \right) \cdots \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2^n} \right) \sinh \left( \frac{x}{2^n} \right) sinh x = 2 n cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) sinh ( 2 n x )
and deduce that, for x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0 ,
sinh x x x 2 n sinh ( x 2 n ) = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) . \frac{\sinh x}{x} \frac{\frac{x}{2^n}}{\sinh \left( \frac{x}{2^n} \right)} = \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \cosh \left( \frac{x}{4} \right) \cdots \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2^n} \right) . x s i n h x s i n h ( 2 n x ) 2 n x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) .
(ii) You are given that the Maclaurin series for sinh x \sinh x sinh x is
sinh x = ∑ r = 0 ∞ x 2 r + 1 ( 2 r + 1 ) ! . \sinh x = \sum_{r=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2r+1}}{(2r+1)!} . sinh x = ∑ r = 0 ∞ ( 2 r + 1 )! x 2 r + 1 .
Use this result to show that, as y y y tends to 0, y sinh y \frac{y}{\sinh y} s i n h y y tends to 1.
Deduce that, for x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0 ,
sinh x x = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) ⋯ . \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \cosh \left( \frac{x}{4} \right) \cdots \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2^n} \right) \cdots . x s i n h x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) ⋯ .
(iii) Let x = ln 2 x = \ln 2 x = ln 2 . Evaluate cosh ( x 2 ) \cosh \left( \frac{x}{2} \right) cosh ( 2 x ) and show that
cosh ( x 4 ) = 1 + 2 1 2 2 × 2 1 4 . \cosh \left( \frac{x}{4} \right) = \frac{1 + 2^{\frac{1}{2}}}{2 \times 2^{\frac{1}{4}}} . cosh ( 4 x ) = 2 × 2 4 1 1 + 2 2 1 .
Use part (ii) to show that
1 ln 2 = 1 + 2 1 2 2 × 1 + 2 1 4 2 × 1 + 2 1 8 2 ⋯ . \frac{1}{\ln 2} = \frac{1 + 2^{\frac{1}{2}}}{2} \times \frac{1 + 2^{\frac{1}{4}}}{2} \times \frac{1 + 2^{\frac{1}{8}}}{2} \cdots . l n 2 1 = 2 1 + 2 2 1 × 2 1 + 2 4 1 × 2 1 + 2 8 1 ⋯ .
(iv) Show that
2 π = 2 2 × 2 + 2 2 × 2 + 2 + 2 2 ⋯ . \frac{2}{\pi} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \times \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}{2} \times \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}}{2} \cdots . π 2 = 2 2 × 2 2 + 2 × 2 2 + 2 + 2 ⋯ .
Hint
n = 1 n=1 n = 1 :sinh x = 2 cosh x 2 sinh x 2 \sinh x=2\cosh\frac{x}{2}\sinh\frac{x}{2} sinh x = 2 cosh 2 x sinh 2 x 。
归纳:2 k + 1 ⋯ sinh x 2 k + 1 = 2 sinh x ⋅ cosh x 2 k + 1 sinh x 2 k + 1 sinh x 2 k = sinh x 2^{k+1}\cdots\sinh\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}=2\sinh x\cdot\frac{\cosh\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\sinh\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}}{\sinh\frac{x}{2^k}}=\sinh x 2 k + 1 ⋯ sinh 2 k + 1 x = 2 sinh x ⋅ s i n h 2 k x c o s h 2 k + 1 x s i n h 2 k + 1 x = sinh x 。
推论:两边除 x x x 整理即得。
y sinh y → 1 \frac{y}{\sinh y}\to 1 s i n h y y → 1 (y → 0 y\to 0 y → 0 )。令 n → ∞ n\to\infty n → ∞ :sinh x x = ∏ n = 1 ∞ cosh x 2 n \frac{\sinh x}{x}=\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}\cosh\frac{x}{2^n} x s i n h x = ∏ n = 1 ∞ cosh 2 n x 。
x = ln 2 x=\ln 2 x = ln 2 :sinh ( ln 2 ) = 3 4 \sinh(\ln 2)=\frac{3}{4} sinh ( ln 2 ) = 4 3 ,cosh ln 2 2 = 3 2 2 \cosh\frac{\ln 2}{2}=\frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh 2 l n 2 = 2 2 3 。
1 ln 2 = 1 + 2 2 × 1 + 2 4 2 × ⋯ = ∏ n = 1 ∞ 1 + 2 1 / 2 n 2 \frac{1}{\ln 2}=\frac{1+\sqrt{2}}{2}\times\frac{1+\sqrt[4]{2}}{2}\times\cdots=\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1+2^{1/2^n}}{2} l n 2 1 = 2 1 + 2 × 2 1 + 4 2 × ⋯ = ∏ n = 1 ∞ 2 1 + 2 1/ 2 n 。
x = i π 2 x=\frac{i\pi}{2} x = 2 iπ :sinh ( i π / 2 ) i π / 2 = 2 π \frac{\sinh(i\pi/2)}{i\pi/2}=\frac{2}{\pi} iπ /2 s i n h ( iπ /2 ) = π 2 。
cos π 4 = 2 2 \cos\frac{\pi}{4}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} cos 4 π = 2 2 ,cos π 8 = 2 + 2 2 \cos\frac{\pi}{8}=\frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}}{2} cos 8 π = 2 2 + 2 。
2 π = 2 2 × 2 + 2 2 × ⋯ \frac{2}{\pi}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\times\frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}}{2}\times\cdots π 2 = 2 2 × 2 2 + 2 × ⋯ (Vieta 公式)。
Model Solution
Part (i)
We prove by induction on n n n that:
sinh x = 2 n cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) sinh ( x 2 n ) P ( n ) \sinh x = 2^n \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \qquad \text{P}(n) sinh x = 2 n cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) sinh ( 2 n x ) P ( n )
Base case (n = 1 n = 1 n = 1 ): We need sinh x = 2 cosh ( x 2 ) sinh ( x 2 ) \sinh x = 2\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) sinh x = 2 cosh ( 2 x ) sinh ( 2 x ) .
Using the identity sinh x = sinh ( 2 ⋅ x 2 ) = 2 sinh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 2 ) \sinh x = \sinh\!\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{2}\right) = 2\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) sinh x = sinh ( 2 ⋅ 2 x ) = 2 sinh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 2 x ) , the base case holds. (This follows from sinh 2 θ = 2 sinh θ cosh θ \sinh 2\theta = 2\sinh\theta\cosh\theta sinh 2 θ = 2 sinh θ cosh θ , which is the hyperbolic analogue of sin 2 θ = 2 sin θ cos θ \sin 2\theta = 2\sin\theta\cos\theta sin 2 θ = 2 sin θ cos θ .)
Inductive step : Assume P( k ) (k) ( k ) holds for some positive integer k k k , i.e.:
sinh x = 2 k cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 k ) sinh ( x 2 k ) \sinh x = 2^k \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^k}\right) \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^k}\right) sinh x = 2 k cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 k x ) sinh ( 2 k x )
We need to show P( k + 1 ) (k+1) ( k + 1 ) : sinh x = 2 k + 1 cosh ( x 2 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 k + 1 ) sinh ( x 2 k + 1 ) \sinh x = 2^{k+1} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right) \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right) sinh x = 2 k + 1 cosh ( 2 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 k + 1 x ) sinh ( 2 k + 1 x ) .
Applying sinh θ = 2 sinh ( θ 2 ) cosh ( θ 2 ) \sinh\theta = 2\sinh\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\cosh\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) sinh θ = 2 sinh ( 2 θ ) cosh ( 2 θ ) with θ = x 2 k \theta = \frac{x}{2^k} θ = 2 k x :
sinh ( x 2 k ) = 2 sinh ( x 2 k + 1 ) cosh ( x 2 k + 1 ) \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^k}\right) = 2\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right)\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right) sinh ( 2 k x ) = 2 sinh ( 2 k + 1 x ) cosh ( 2 k + 1 x )
Substituting into the inductive hypothesis:
sinh x = 2 k cosh ( x 2 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 k ) ⋅ 2 sinh ( x 2 k + 1 ) cosh ( x 2 k + 1 ) \sinh x = 2^k \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^k}\right) \cdot 2\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right)\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right) sinh x = 2 k cosh ( 2 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 k x ) ⋅ 2 sinh ( 2 k + 1 x ) cosh ( 2 k + 1 x )
= 2 k + 1 cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 k + 1 ) sinh ( x 2 k + 1 ) = 2^{k+1} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right) \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^{k+1}}\right) = 2 k + 1 cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 k + 1 x ) sinh ( 2 k + 1 x )
This is P( k + 1 ) (k+1) ( k + 1 ) . By induction, P( n ) (n) ( n ) holds for all positive integers n n n . ■ \blacksquare ■
Deduction : For x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0 , divide both sides of P( n ) (n) ( n ) by x x x :
sinh x x = 2 n cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) ⋅ sinh ( x 2 n ) x 2 n ⋅ 2 n 1 ⋅ 1 1 \frac{\sinh x}{x} = 2^n \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \cdot \frac{\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)}{\frac{x}{2^n} \cdot \frac{2^n}{1}} \cdot \frac{1}{1} x s i n h x = 2 n cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) ⋅ 2 n x ⋅ 1 2 n s i n h ( 2 n x ) ⋅ 1 1
More directly, rewrite P( n ) (n) ( n ) as:
sinh x = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) ⋅ 2 n sinh ( x 2 n ) 1 \sinh x = \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \cdot \frac{2^n \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)}{1} sinh x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) ⋅ 1 2 n s i n h ( 2 n x )
Divide both sides by x x x :
sinh x x = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) ⋅ 2 n sinh ( x 2 n ) x \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \cdot \frac{2^n \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)}{x} x s i n h x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) ⋅ x 2 n s i n h ( 2 n x )
Since x = 2 n ⋅ x 2 n x = 2^n \cdot \frac{x}{2^n} x = 2 n ⋅ 2 n x :
sinh x x = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) ⋅ sinh ( x 2 n ) x 2 n \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \cdot \frac{\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)}{\frac{x}{2^n}} x s i n h x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) ⋅ 2 n x s i n h ( 2 n x )
Rearranging:
sinh x x ⋅ x 2 n sinh ( x 2 n ) = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) ■ \frac{\sinh x}{x} \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{2^n}}{\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)} = \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) \qquad \blacksquare x s i n h x ⋅ s i n h ( 2 n x ) 2 n x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) ■
Part (ii)
Show that y sinh y → 1 \frac{y}{\sinh y} \to 1 s i n h y y → 1 as y → 0 y \to 0 y → 0 .
From the Maclaurin series:
sinh y = y + y 3 3 ! + y 5 5 ! + ⋯ = y ( 1 + y 2 6 + y 4 120 + ⋯ ) \sinh y = y + \frac{y^3}{3!} + \frac{y^5}{5!} + \cdots = y\left(1 + \frac{y^2}{6} + \frac{y^4}{120} + \cdots\right) sinh y = y + 3 ! y 3 + 5 ! y 5 + ⋯ = y ( 1 + 6 y 2 + 120 y 4 + ⋯ )
So:
y sinh y = 1 1 + y 2 6 + y 4 120 + ⋯ \frac{y}{\sinh y} = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{y^2}{6} + \frac{y^4}{120} + \cdots} s i n h y y = 1 + 6 y 2 + 120 y 4 + ⋯ 1
As y → 0 y \to 0 y → 0 , the terms y 2 6 , y 4 120 , … \frac{y^2}{6}, \frac{y^4}{120}, \ldots 6 y 2 , 120 y 4 , … all tend to 0 0 0 , so:
lim y → 0 y sinh y = 1 1 + 0 = 1 ■ \lim_{y \to 0} \frac{y}{\sinh y} = \frac{1}{1 + 0} = 1 \qquad \blacksquare lim y → 0 s i n h y y = 1 + 0 1 = 1 ■
Deduction : From Part (i), for any fixed x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0 and all n n n :
sinh x x ⋅ x 2 n sinh ( x 2 n ) = cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) \frac{\sinh x}{x} \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{2^n}}{\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)} = \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) x s i n h x ⋅ s i n h ( 2 n x ) 2 n x = cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x )
As n → ∞ n \to \infty n → ∞ , x 2 n → 0 \frac{x}{2^n} \to 0 2 n x → 0 , so x 2 n sinh ( x 2 n ) → 1 \frac{\frac{x}{2^n}}{\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)} \to 1 s i n h ( 2 n x ) 2 n x → 1 . Therefore:
sinh x x = lim n → ∞ cosh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 4 ) ⋯ cosh ( x 2 n ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( x 2 m ) ■ \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) \cdots \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right) = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) \qquad \blacksquare x s i n h x = lim n → ∞ cosh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 4 x ) ⋯ cosh ( 2 n x ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m x ) ■
Part (iii)
Let x = ln 2 x = \ln 2 x = ln 2 .
Evaluate cosh ( x 2 ) \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) cosh ( 2 x ) :
sinh ( ln 2 ) = e ln 2 − e − ln 2 2 = 2 − 1 2 2 = 3 4 \sinh(\ln 2) = \frac{e^{\ln 2} - e^{-\ln 2}}{2} = \frac{2 - \frac{1}{2}}{2} = \frac{3}{4} sinh ( ln 2 ) = 2 e l n 2 − e − l n 2 = 2 2 − 2 1 = 4 3
Using sinh x = 2 sinh ( x 2 ) cosh ( x 2 ) \sinh x = 2\sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) sinh x = 2 sinh ( 2 x ) cosh ( 2 x ) and cosh 2 ( x 2 ) − sinh 2 ( x 2 ) = 1 \cosh^2\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) - \sinh^2\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 1 cosh 2 ( 2 x ) − sinh 2 ( 2 x ) = 1 :
sinh ( ln 2 ) = 2 sinh ( ln 2 2 ) cosh ( ln 2 2 ) = 3 4 \sinh(\ln 2) = 2\sinh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2}\right)\cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2}\right) = \frac{3}{4} sinh ( ln 2 ) = 2 sinh ( 2 l n 2 ) cosh ( 2 l n 2 ) = 4 3
Alternatively, compute directly:
cosh ( ln 2 2 ) = e ln 2 / 2 + e − ln 2 / 2 2 = 2 + 1 2 2 = 2 + 2 2 2 = 3 2 2 2 = 3 2 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2}\right) = \frac{e^{\ln 2/2} + e^{-\ln 2/2}}{2} = \frac{\sqrt{2} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}}{2} = \frac{\sqrt{2} + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}}{2} = \frac{\frac{3\sqrt{2}}{2}}{2} = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh ( 2 l n 2 ) = 2 e l n 2/2 + e − l n 2/2 = 2 2 + 2 1 = 2 2 + 2 2 = 2 2 3 2 = 2 2 3
So cosh ( x 2 ) = 3 2 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh ( 2 x ) = 2 2 3 . Note that 3 2 2 = 3 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 = 1 + 2 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 = 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} = \frac{3}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2}} = \frac{1 + 2}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2}} = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2}} 2 2 3 = 2 ⋅ 2 1/2 3 = 2 ⋅ 2 1/2 1 + 2 = 2 ⋅ 2 1/2 1 + 2 1/2 … Actually, let me write this differently.
3 2 2 = 3 2 3 / 2 = 3 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} = \frac{3}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2}} 2 2 3 = 2 3/2 3 = 2 ⋅ 2 1/2 3
We can verify: 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 4 \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/4}} 2 ⋅ 2 1/4 1 + 2 1/2 … hmm, let me check the pattern the question wants.
Actually, cosh ( x 2 ) = 3 2 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh ( 2 x ) = 2 2 3 , and note:
3 2 2 = 3 2 2 ⋅ 2 2 = 3 2 4 \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{3\sqrt{2}}{4} 2 2 3 = 2 2 3 ⋅ 2 2 = 4 3 2
But let’s think about the pattern more carefully. We have e x / 2 = 2 1 / 2 e^{x/2} = 2^{1/2} e x /2 = 2 1/2 , so:
cosh ( x 2 ) = 2 1 / 2 + 2 − 1 / 2 2 = 2 1 / 2 ( 1 + 2 − 1 ) 2 = 2 1 / 2 ⋅ 3 2 2 = 3 2 3 / 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{2^{1/2} + 2^{-1/2}}{2} = \frac{2^{1/2}(1 + 2^{-1})}{2} = \frac{2^{1/2} \cdot \frac{3}{2}}{2} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} cosh ( 2 x ) = 2 2 1/2 + 2 − 1/2 = 2 2 1/2 ( 1 + 2 − 1 ) = 2 2 1/2 ⋅ 2 3 = 2 3/2 3
More usefully: 2 1 / 2 + 2 − 1 / 2 2 = 1 2 ( 2 1 / 2 + 2 − 1 / 2 ) \frac{2^{1/2} + 2^{-1/2}}{2} = \frac{1}{2}(2^{1/2} + 2^{-1/2}) 2 2 1/2 + 2 − 1/2 = 2 1 ( 2 1/2 + 2 − 1/2 ) .
Show cosh ( x 4 ) = 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 × 2 1 / 4 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2 \times 2^{1/4}} cosh ( 4 x ) = 2 × 2 1/4 1 + 2 1/2 :
cosh ( x 4 ) = e x / 4 + e − x / 4 2 = 2 1 / 4 + 2 − 1 / 4 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) = \frac{e^{x/4} + e^{-x/4}}{2} = \frac{2^{1/4} + 2^{-1/4}}{2} cosh ( 4 x ) = 2 e x /4 + e − x /4 = 2 2 1/4 + 2 − 1/4
Now 2 − 1 / 4 = 1 2 1 / 4 2^{-1/4} = \frac{1}{2^{1/4}} 2 − 1/4 = 2 1/4 1 , so:
cosh ( x 4 ) = 2 1 / 4 + 1 2 1 / 4 2 = 2 1 / 2 + 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 4 = 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 × 2 1 / 4 ■ \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) = \frac{2^{1/4} + \frac{1}{2^{1/4}}}{2} = \frac{2^{1/2} + 1}{2 \cdot 2^{1/4}} = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2 \times 2^{1/4}} \qquad \blacksquare cosh ( 4 x ) = 2 2 1/4 + 2 1/4 1 = 2 ⋅ 2 1/4 2 1/2 + 1 = 2 × 2 1/4 1 + 2 1/2 ■
General pattern : For any m ≥ 1 m \geq 1 m ≥ 1 :
cosh ( x 2 m ) = 2 1 / 2 m + 2 − 1 / 2 m 2 = 2 1 / 2 m + 1 + 2 − 1 / 2 m + 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m + 1 2 1 / 2 m + 1 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) = \frac{2^{1/2^m} + 2^{-1/2^m}}{2} = \frac{2^{1/2^{m+1}} + 2^{-1/2^{m+1}}}{2} \cdot \frac{2^{1/2^{m+1}}}{2^{1/2^{m+1}}} cosh ( 2 m x ) = 2 2 1/ 2 m + 2 − 1/ 2 m = 2 2 1/ 2 m + 1 + 2 − 1/ 2 m + 1 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m + 1 2 1/ 2 m + 1
Actually, let me just compute each factor directly. For m ≥ 1 m \geq 1 m ≥ 1 , e x / 2 m = 2 1 / 2 m e^{x/2^m} = 2^{1/2^m} e x / 2 m = 2 1/ 2 m :
cosh ( x 2 m ) = 2 1 / 2 m + 2 − 1 / 2 m 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) = \frac{2^{1/2^m} + 2^{-1/2^m}}{2} cosh ( 2 m x ) = 2 2 1/ 2 m + 2 − 1/ 2 m
Note that 2 1 / 2 m + 2 − 1 / 2 m = 2 − 1 / 2 m ( 2 2 / 2 m + 1 ) = 2 − 1 / 2 m ( 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 ) 2^{1/2^m} + 2^{-1/2^m} = 2^{-1/2^m}(2^{2/2^m} + 1) = 2^{-1/2^m}(1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}) 2 1/ 2 m + 2 − 1/ 2 m = 2 − 1/ 2 m ( 2 2/ 2 m + 1 ) = 2 − 1/ 2 m ( 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 ) . So:
cosh ( x 2 m ) = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m}} cosh ( 2 m x ) = 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1
For m = 1 m = 1 m = 1 : cosh ( x 2 ) = 1 + 2 1 / 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 = 3 2 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/1}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2}} = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh ( 2 x ) = 2 ⋅ 2 1/2 1 + 2 1/1 = 2 2 3 .
For m = 2 m = 2 m = 2 : cosh ( x 4 ) = 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 4 \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{4}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/4}} cosh ( 4 x ) = 2 ⋅ 2 1/4 1 + 2 1/2 .
For general m m m : cosh ( x 2 m ) = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m}} cosh ( 2 m x ) = 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 .
Deduction using Part (ii) : From Part (ii), sinh x x = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( x 2 m ) \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) x s i n h x = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m x ) . With x = ln 2 x = \ln 2 x = ln 2 :
sinh ( ln 2 ) ln 2 = 3 / 4 ln 2 = 3 4 ln 2 \frac{\sinh(\ln 2)}{\ln 2} = \frac{3/4}{\ln 2} = \frac{3}{4\ln 2} l n 2 s i n h ( l n 2 ) = l n 2 3/4 = 4 l n 2 3
And:
∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m}} ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1
So:
3 4 ln 2 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m \frac{3}{4\ln 2} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m}} 4 l n 2 3 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1
We need to show this gives 1 ln 2 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ 1 + 2 1 / 2 m 2 \frac{1}{\ln 2} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^m}}{2} l n 2 1 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ 2 1 + 2 1/ 2 m .
Let’s compute the partial products. Let P n = ∏ m = 1 n cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) P_n = \prod_{m=1}^{n} \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) P n = ∏ m = 1 n cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) .
From Part (i): P n = sinh ( ln 2 ) ln 2 ⋅ ln 2 / 2 n sinh ( ln 2 / 2 n ) = 3 4 ln 2 ⋅ ln 2 / 2 n sinh ( ln 2 / 2 n ) P_n = \frac{\sinh(\ln 2)}{\ln 2} \cdot \frac{\ln 2 / 2^n}{\sinh(\ln 2 / 2^n)} = \frac{3}{4\ln 2} \cdot \frac{\ln 2 / 2^n}{\sinh(\ln 2 / 2^n)} P n = l n 2 s i n h ( l n 2 ) ⋅ s i n h ( l n 2/ 2 n ) l n 2/ 2 n = 4 l n 2 3 ⋅ s i n h ( l n 2/ 2 n ) l n 2/ 2 n .
As n → ∞ n \to \infty n → ∞ : ln 2 / 2 n sinh ( ln 2 / 2 n ) → 1 \frac{\ln 2 / 2^n}{\sinh(\ln 2 / 2^n)} \to 1 s i n h ( l n 2/ 2 n ) l n 2/ 2 n → 1 , so P n → 3 4 ln 2 P_n \to \frac{3}{4\ln 2} P n → 4 l n 2 3 .
Now compute P n P_n P n directly:
P n = ∏ m = 1 n 2 1 / 2 m + 2 − 1 / 2 m 2 P_n = \prod_{m=1}^{n} \frac{2^{1/2^m} + 2^{-1/2^m}}{2} P n = ∏ m = 1 n 2 2 1/ 2 m + 2 − 1/ 2 m
Let a m = 2 1 / 2 m a_m = 2^{1/2^m} a m = 2 1/ 2 m . Then cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = a m + a m − 1 2 = a m 2 + 1 2 a m \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{a_m + a_m^{-1}}{2} = \frac{a_m^2 + 1}{2a_m} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 a m + a m − 1 = 2 a m a m 2 + 1 .
Note a m 2 = 2 1 / 2 m − 1 = a m − 1 a_m^2 = 2^{1/2^{m-1}} = a_{m-1} a m 2 = 2 1/ 2 m − 1 = a m − 1 (where a 0 = 2 a_0 = 2 a 0 = 2 ). So cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = a m − 1 + 1 2 a m \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{a_{m-1} + 1}{2a_m} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 a m a m − 1 + 1 .
P n = ∏ m = 1 n a m − 1 + 1 2 a m = ∏ m = 1 n ( a m − 1 + 1 ) 2 n ∏ m = 1 n a m P_n = \prod_{m=1}^{n} \frac{a_{m-1} + 1}{2a_m} = \frac{\prod_{m=1}^{n}(a_{m-1} + 1)}{2^n \prod_{m=1}^{n} a_m} P n = ∏ m = 1 n 2 a m a m − 1 + 1 = 2 n ∏ m = 1 n a m ∏ m = 1 n ( a m − 1 + 1 )
The denominator: ∏ m = 1 n a m = 2 1 / 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 4 ⋯ 2 1 / 2 n = 2 ∑ m = 1 n 1 / 2 m = 2 1 − 1 / 2 n \prod_{m=1}^{n} a_m = 2^{1/2} \cdot 2^{1/4} \cdots 2^{1/2^n} = 2^{\sum_{m=1}^{n} 1/2^m} = 2^{1 - 1/2^n} ∏ m = 1 n a m = 2 1/2 ⋅ 2 1/4 ⋯ 2 1/ 2 n = 2 ∑ m = 1 n 1/ 2 m = 2 1 − 1/ 2 n .
So 2 n ⋅ 2 1 − 1 / 2 n = 2 n + 1 − 1 / 2 n 2^n \cdot 2^{1-1/2^n} = 2^{n+1-1/2^n} 2 n ⋅ 2 1 − 1/ 2 n = 2 n + 1 − 1/ 2 n .
The numerator: ∏ m = 1 n ( a m − 1 + 1 ) = ( a 0 + 1 ) ( a 1 + 1 ) ⋯ ( a n − 1 + 1 ) = 3 ⋅ ( 1 + 2 ) ⋅ ( 1 + 2 1 / 4 ) ⋯ ( 1 + 2 1 / 2 n − 1 ) \prod_{m=1}^{n}(a_{m-1} + 1) = (a_0 + 1)(a_1 + 1) \cdots (a_{n-1} + 1) = 3 \cdot (1 + \sqrt{2}) \cdot (1 + 2^{1/4}) \cdots (1 + 2^{1/2^{n-1}}) ∏ m = 1 n ( a m − 1 + 1 ) = ( a 0 + 1 ) ( a 1 + 1 ) ⋯ ( a n − 1 + 1 ) = 3 ⋅ ( 1 + 2 ) ⋅ ( 1 + 2 1/4 ) ⋯ ( 1 + 2 1/ 2 n − 1 ) .
Hmm, this is getting complicated. Let me try a telescoping approach instead.
Note that a m − 1 + 1 2 a m = a m − 1 + 1 2 a m \frac{a_{m-1}+1}{2a_m} = \frac{a_{m-1}+1}{2a_m} 2 a m a m − 1 + 1 = 2 a m a m − 1 + 1 . Since a m − 1 = a m 2 a_{m-1} = a_m^2 a m − 1 = a m 2 :
a m 2 + 1 2 a m = ( a m + 1 ) 2 − 2 a m 2 a m \frac{a_m^2 + 1}{2a_m} = \frac{(a_m+1)^2 - 2a_m}{2a_m} 2 a m a m 2 + 1 = 2 a m ( a m + 1 ) 2 − 2 a m
That doesn’t telescope nicely either. Let me try yet another approach.
Actually, let’s just use the result from Part (ii) directly. We have sinh x x = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( x 2 m ) \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) x s i n h x = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m x ) , so:
1 ln 2 = 1 sinh ( ln 2 ) ⋅ sinh ( ln 2 ) ln 2 = 4 3 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) \frac{1}{\ln 2} = \frac{1}{\sinh(\ln 2)} \cdot \frac{\sinh(\ln 2)}{\ln 2} = \frac{4}{3} \cdot \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) l n 2 1 = s i n h ( l n 2 ) 1 ⋅ l n 2 s i n h ( l n 2 ) = 3 4 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m l n 2 )
Wait, sinh ( ln 2 ) = 3 / 4 \sinh(\ln 2) = 3/4 sinh ( ln 2 ) = 3/4 , so sinh ( ln 2 ) ln 2 = 3 4 ln 2 \frac{\sinh(\ln 2)}{\ln 2} = \frac{3}{4\ln 2} l n 2 s i n h ( l n 2 ) = 4 l n 2 3 , giving 1 ln 2 = 4 3 ⋅ 3 4 ln 2 = 1 ln 2 \frac{1}{\ln 2} = \frac{4}{3} \cdot \frac{3}{4\ln 2} = \frac{1}{\ln 2} l n 2 1 = 3 4 ⋅ 4 l n 2 3 = l n 2 1 . That’s circular.
Let me think about this differently. We need to show:
1 ln 2 = 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 ⋅ 1 + 2 1 / 4 2 ⋅ 1 + 2 1 / 8 2 ⋯ \frac{1}{\ln 2} = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2} \cdot \frac{1 + 2^{1/4}}{2} \cdot \frac{1 + 2^{1/8}}{2} \cdots l n 2 1 = 2 1 + 2 1/2 ⋅ 2 1 + 2 1/4 ⋅ 2 1 + 2 1/8 ⋯
Let me define b m = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m 2 b_m = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^m}}{2} b m = 2 1 + 2 1/ 2 m for m = 1 , 2 , 3 , … m = 1, 2, 3, \ldots m = 1 , 2 , 3 , …
So the right side is ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m .
Now, cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = 2 1 / 2 m + 2 − 1 / 2 m 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{2^{1/2^m} + 2^{-1/2^m}}{2} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 2 1/ 2 m + 2 − 1/ 2 m . We showed this equals 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m = b m − 1 2 1 / 2 m \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m}} = \frac{b_{m-1}}{2^{1/2^m}} 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 = 2 1/ 2 m b m − 1 (for m ≥ 2 m \geq 2 m ≥ 2 , and cosh ( ln 2 2 ) = 3 2 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2}\right) = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh ( 2 l n 2 ) = 2 2 3 ).
Hmm wait, let me be more careful. We have:
cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = 2 1 / 2 m + 2 − 1 / 2 m 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{2^{1/2^m} + 2^{-1/2^m}}{2} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 2 1/ 2 m + 2 − 1/ 2 m
Let t = 2 1 / 2 m t = 2^{1/2^m} t = 2 1/ 2 m . Then cosh = t + t − 1 2 = t 2 + 1 2 t \cosh = \frac{t + t^{-1}}{2} = \frac{t^2 + 1}{2t} cosh = 2 t + t − 1 = 2 t t 2 + 1 .
Now t 2 = 2 1 / 2 m − 1 t^2 = 2^{1/2^{m-1}} t 2 = 2 1/ 2 m − 1 , so t 2 + 1 = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 t^2 + 1 = 1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}} t 2 + 1 = 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 .
And 2 t = 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m = 2 1 + 1 / 2 m 2t = 2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m} = 2^{1 + 1/2^m} 2 t = 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m = 2 1 + 1/ 2 m .
So cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 1 + 1 / 2 m \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2^{1+1/2^m}} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 1 + 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 .
For m = 1 m = 1 m = 1 : cosh ( ln 2 2 ) = 1 + 2 2 1 + 1 / 2 = 3 2 3 / 2 = 3 2 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2}\right) = \frac{1 + 2}{2^{1+1/2}} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} cosh ( 2 l n 2 ) = 2 1 + 1/2 1 + 2 = 2 3/2 3 = 2 2 3 . Correct.
For m ≥ 2 m \geq 2 m ≥ 2 : cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 1 + 1 / 2 m = b m − 1 2 1 / 2 m ⋅ 1 1 = 2 ⋅ b m − 1 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 m \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2^{1+1/2^m}} = \frac{b_{m-1}}{2^{1/2^m}} \cdot \frac{1}{1} = \frac{2 \cdot b_{m-1}}{2 \cdot 2^{1/2^m}} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 1 + 1/ 2 m 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 = 2 1/ 2 m b m − 1 ⋅ 1 1 = 2 ⋅ 2 1/ 2 m 2 ⋅ b m − 1 …
Actually b m − 1 = 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 2 b_{m-1} = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}}}{2} b m − 1 = 2 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 , so 1 + 2 1 / 2 m − 1 = 2 b m − 1 1 + 2^{1/2^{m-1}} = 2b_{m-1} 1 + 2 1/ 2 m − 1 = 2 b m − 1 .
Therefore cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = 2 b m − 1 2 1 + 1 / 2 m = b m − 1 2 1 / 2 m \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{2b_{m-1}}{2^{1+1/2^m}} = \frac{b_{m-1}}{2^{1/2^m}} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 1 + 1/ 2 m 2 b m − 1 = 2 1/ 2 m b m − 1 .
So for m ≥ 2 m \geq 2 m ≥ 2 :
cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = b m − 1 2 1 / 2 m \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{b_{m-1}}{2^{1/2^m}} cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 1/ 2 m b m − 1
And cosh ( ln 2 2 ) = 3 2 2 = 3 2 3 / 2 \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2}\right) = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} cosh ( 2 l n 2 ) = 2 2 3 = 2 3/2 3 .
Now:
∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( ln 2 2 m ) = 3 2 3 / 2 ⋅ ∏ m = 2 ∞ b m − 1 2 1 / 2 m = 3 2 3 / 2 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m ∏ m = 2 ∞ 2 1 / 2 m \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{\ln 2}{2^m}\right) = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} \cdot \prod_{m=2}^{\infty} \frac{b_{m-1}}{2^{1/2^m}} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} \cdot \frac{\prod_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m}{\prod_{m=2}^{\infty} 2^{1/2^m}} ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m l n 2 ) = 2 3/2 3 ⋅ ∏ m = 2 ∞ 2 1/ 2 m b m − 1 = 2 3/2 3 ⋅ ∏ m = 2 ∞ 2 1/ 2 m ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m
Now ∏ m = 2 ∞ 2 1 / 2 m = 2 ∑ m = 2 ∞ 1 / 2 m = 2 1 / 2 \prod_{m=2}^{\infty} 2^{1/2^m} = 2^{\sum_{m=2}^{\infty} 1/2^m} = 2^{1/2} ∏ m = 2 ∞ 2 1/ 2 m = 2 ∑ m = 2 ∞ 1/ 2 m = 2 1/2 .
Also b 1 = 1 + 2 2 b_1 = \frac{1 + \sqrt{2}}{2} b 1 = 2 1 + 2 , and 3 2 3 / 2 = 3 2 2 \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}} 2 3/2 3 = 2 2 3 .
So:
3 4 ln 2 = 3 2 3 / 2 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m 2 1 / 2 = 3 2 3 / 2 ⋅ 2 1 / 2 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m = 3 4 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m \frac{3}{4\ln 2} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2}} \cdot \frac{\prod_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m}{2^{1/2}} = \frac{3}{2^{3/2} \cdot 2^{1/2}} \cdot \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m = \frac{3}{4} \cdot \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m 4 l n 2 3 = 2 3/2 3 ⋅ 2 1/2 ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m = 2 3/2 ⋅ 2 1/2 3 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m = 4 3 ⋅ ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m
Therefore:
1 ln 2 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m = 1 + 2 1 / 2 2 ⋅ 1 + 2 1 / 4 2 ⋅ 1 + 2 1 / 8 2 ⋯ ■ \frac{1}{\ln 2} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m = \frac{1 + 2^{1/2}}{2} \cdot \frac{1 + 2^{1/4}}{2} \cdot \frac{1 + 2^{1/8}}{2} \cdots \qquad \blacksquare l n 2 1 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ b m = 2 1 + 2 1/2 ⋅ 2 1 + 2 1/4 ⋅ 2 1 + 2 1/8 ⋯ ■
Part (iv)
We substitute x = i π 2 x = \frac{i\pi}{2} x = 2 iπ into the result of Part (ii): sinh x x = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( x 2 m ) \frac{\sinh x}{x} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{2^m}\right) x s i n h x = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cosh ( 2 m x ) .
Left side : Using sinh ( i θ ) = i sin θ \sinh(i\theta) = i\sin\theta sinh ( i θ ) = i sin θ :
sinh ( i π 2 ) i π 2 = i sin ( π 2 ) i π 2 = 1 π 2 = 2 π \frac{\sinh\!\left(\frac{i\pi}{2}\right)}{\frac{i\pi}{2}} = \frac{i\sin\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)}{\frac{i\pi}{2}} = \frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{2}} = \frac{2}{\pi} 2 iπ s i n h ( 2 iπ ) = 2 iπ i s i n ( 2 π ) = 2 π 1 = π 2
Right side : Using cosh ( i θ ) = cos θ \cosh(i\theta) = \cos\theta cosh ( i θ ) = cos θ :
cosh ( i π 2 ⋅ 2 m ) = cos ( π 2 m + 1 ) \cosh\!\left(\frac{i\pi}{2 \cdot 2^m}\right) = \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2^{m+1}}\right) cosh ( 2 ⋅ 2 m iπ ) = cos ( 2 m + 1 π )
So:
2 π = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cos ( π 2 m + 1 ) = cos ( π 4 ) cos ( π 8 ) cos ( π 16 ) ⋯ \frac{2}{\pi} = \prod_{m=1}^{\infty} \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2^{m+1}}\right) = \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right) \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{16}\right) \cdots π 2 = ∏ m = 1 ∞ cos ( 2 m + 1 π ) = cos ( 4 π ) cos ( 8 π ) cos ( 16 π ) ⋯
Now we evaluate each factor.
cos ( π 4 ) = 2 2 \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} cos ( 4 π ) = 2 2
For cos ( π 8 ) \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) cos ( 8 π ) , use the half-angle formula cos ( θ 2 ) = 1 + cos θ 2 \cos\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \cos\theta}{2}} cos ( 2 θ ) = 2 1 + c o s θ with θ = π 4 \theta = \frac{\pi}{4} θ = 4 π :
cos ( π 8 ) = 1 + cos ( π / 4 ) 2 = 1 + 2 2 2 = 2 + 2 4 = 2 + 2 2 \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \cos(\pi/4)}{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}}{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 + \sqrt{2}}{4}} = \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}{2} cos ( 8 π ) = 2 1 + c o s ( π /4 ) = 2 1 + 2 2 = 4 2 + 2 = 2 2 + 2
For cos ( π 16 ) \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{16}\right) cos ( 16 π ) , apply the half-angle formula again with θ = π 8 \theta = \frac{\pi}{8} θ = 8 π :
cos ( π 16 ) = 1 + cos ( π / 8 ) 2 = 1 + 2 + 2 2 2 = 2 + 2 + 2 2 \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{16}\right) = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \cos(\pi/8)}{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}}{2}}{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}}{2} cos ( 16 π ) = 2 1 + c o s ( π /8 ) = 2 1 + 2 2 + 2 = 2 2 + 2 + 2
In general, defining c 1 = 2 c_1 = \sqrt{2} c 1 = 2 and c k + 1 = 2 + c k c_{k+1} = \sqrt{2 + c_k} c k + 1 = 2 + c k , we get cos ( π 2 m + 1 ) = c m 2 \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2^{m+1}}\right) = \frac{c_m}{2} cos ( 2 m + 1 π ) = 2 c m .
Therefore:
2 π = 2 2 ⋅ 2 + 2 2 ⋅ 2 + 2 + 2 2 ⋯ ■ \frac{2}{\pi} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}{2} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}}{2} \cdots \qquad \blacksquare π 2 = 2 2 ⋅ 2 2 + 2 ⋅ 2 2 + 2 + 2 ⋯ ■
Examiner Notes
第四受欢迎题目(80%+考生尝试),平均分9/20。归纳法中逻辑流向不规范和未讨论除零问题是常见扣分点。第(ii)部分许多考生误用洛必达法则而非题目要求的麦克劳林级数。第(iv)部分最佳方法是虚数代换(令x=iπ/2),但许多考生试图使用Osborn法则却未充分论证。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Standard | Marks : 20
5 (i) Show that
∫ − a a 1 1 + e x d x = a for all a ⩾ 0. \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+e^{x}} dx = a \text{ for all } a \geqslant 0. ∫ − a a 1 + e x 1 d x = a for all a ⩾ 0.
(ii) Explain why, if g g g is a continuous function and
∫ 0 a g ( x ) d x = 0 for all a ⩾ 0 , \int_{0}^{a} g(x) dx = 0 \text{ for all } a \geqslant 0, ∫ 0 a g ( x ) d x = 0 for all a ⩾ 0 ,
then g ( x ) = 0 g(x) = 0 g ( x ) = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 .
Let f f f be a continuous function with f ( x ) ⩾ 0 f(x) \geqslant 0 f ( x ) ⩾ 0 for all x x x . Show that
∫ − a a 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = a for all a ⩾ 0 \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = a \text{ for all } a \geqslant 0 ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = a for all a ⩾ 0
if and only if
1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) − 1 = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 , \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} - 1 = 0 \text{ for all } x \geqslant 0, 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 − 1 = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 ,
and hence if and only if f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 f(x)f(-x) = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 for all x x x .
(iii) Let f f f be a continuous function such that, for all x x x , f ( x ) ⩾ 0 f(x) \geqslant 0 f ( x ) ⩾ 0 and f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 f(x)f(-x) = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 . Show that, if h h h is a continuous function with h ( x ) = h ( − x ) h(x) = h(-x) h ( x ) = h ( − x ) for all x x x , then
∫ − a a h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) d x . \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{0}^{a} h(x) dx . ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) d x .
(iv) Hence find the exact value of
∫ − 1 2 π 1 2 π e − x cos x cosh x d x . \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{e^{-x} \cos x}{\cosh x} dx . ∫ − 2 1 π 2 1 π c o s h x e − x c o s x d x .
Hint
解题思路
本题围绕积分对称性展开,四个部分层层递进:
Part (i) 通过具体函数 1/(1+e^x) 建立一个积分恒等式
Part (ii) 利用微积分基本定理推广到一般函数,建立充要条件
Part (iii) 将结论推广到含偶函数 h(x) 的被积函数
Part (iv) 将理论应用于具体积分求值
Part (i) :证明 ∫_{-a}^{a} 1/(1+e^x) dx = a(a ≥ 0)
方法一(分子分母同乘 e^{-x}):
∫{-a}^{a} 1/(1+e^x) dx = ∫ {-a}^{a} e^{-x}/(e^{-x}+1) dx = [-ln(e^{-x}+1)]_{-a}^{a} = ln((e^a+1)/(e^{-a}+1)) = ln(e^a) = a
方法二(拆项法):
1/(1+e^x) + 1/(1+e^{-x}) = 1/(1+e^x) + e^x/(1+e^x) = 1
因此 ∫_{-a}^{a} 1/(1+e^x) dx = ∫_0^a 1 dx = a。
Part (ii) 第一部分 :若 g 连续且 ∫_0^a g(x) dx = 0 对所有 a ≥ 0,则 g(x) = 0(x ≥ 0)
由微积分基本定理(FTC),设 G(a) = ∫_0^a g(x) dx,则 G(a) = 0 对所有 a ≥ 0,故 G’(a) = g(a) = 0 对所有 a ≥ 0。
Part (ii) 第二部分 :证明充要条件
必要性(⇒):
∫{-a}^{a} 1/(1+f(x)) dx = a ⇔ ∫ {-a}^{0} 1/(1+f(x)) dx + ∫{0}^{a} 1/(1+f(x)) dx = a
对第一项作 x → -x 代换:
⇔ ∫ {0}^{a} 1/(1+f(-x)) dx + ∫{0}^{a} 1/(1+f(x)) dx = a
⇔ ∫ {0}^{a} [1/(1+f(-x)) + 1/(1+f(x)) - 1] dx = 0
由第一部分结论,被积函数恒为零:
1/(1+f(-x)) + 1/(1+f(x)) - 1 = 0 ∀ x ≥ 0
充分性(⇐):反向推导同样成立。
化简得 f(x)f(-x) = 1:
1/(1+f(x)) + 1/(1+f(-x)) = 1 ⇔ 1+f(-x) + 1+f(x) = (1+f(x))(1+f(-x))
⇔ 2 + f(x) + f(-x) = 1 + f(x) + f(-x) + f(x)f(-x) ⇔ f(x)f(-x) = 1
Part (iii) :设 f(x) ≥ 0,f(x)f(-x) = 1,h 连续且 h(x) = h(-x),证明
∫_{-a}^{a} h(x)/(1+f(x)) dx = ∫_0^a h(x) dx
∫{-a}^{a} h(x)/(1+f(x)) dx = ∫ {-a}^{0} h(x)/(1+f(x)) dx + ∫_{0}^{a} h(x)/(1+f(x)) dx
对第一项作 x → -x 代换,利用 h(-x) = h(x):
= ∫{0}^{a} h(x)/(1+f(-x)) dx + ∫ {0}^{a} h(x)/(1+f(x)) dx = ∫_0^a h(x)[1/(1+f(-x)) + 1/(1+f(x))] dx
由 Part (ii) 的结论 1/(1+f(-x)) + 1/(1+f(x)) = 1:
= ∫_0^a h(x) dx
Part (iv) :求 ∫_{-π/2}^{π/2} (e^{-x} cos x)/cosh x dx
第一步:化简被积函数
(e^{-x} cos x)/cosh x = (e^{-x} cos x)/((e^x + e^{-x})/2) = (2 cos x)/(e^{2x} + 1) = (2 cos x)/(1 + e^{2x})
第二步:验证条件
h(x) = cos x:连续且 h(-x) = cos(-x) = cos x = h(x)(偶函数)✓
f(x) = e^{2x}:连续,f(x) > 0,f(x)f(-x) = e^{2x} · e^{-2x} = 1 ✓
第三步:应用 Part (iii) 结论
∫_{-π/2}^{π/2} (2 cos x)/(1+e^{2x}) dx = 2∫_0^{π/2} cos x dx = 2[sin x]_0^{π/2} = 2(1 - 0) = 2
常见错误(Examiner Notes)
Part (i):积分 ∫ 1/(1+e^x) dx 错误地算成 ln(1+e^x)
Part (ii):直接从 ∫_{-a}^{a} g(x) dx = 0 推出 g(x) = 0,这是错误推理
Part (ii):使用 u = -x 代换时未展示充分的推导步骤
Part (iii):未意识到 h(x) = h(-x) 即使题目已给出此条件
Part (iv):未验证 cos x 和 e^{2x} 满足 Part (iii) 的条件;遗漏因子 2
Model Solution
Part (i)
Let I = ∫ − a a 1 1 + e x d x I = \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+e^{x}} dx I = ∫ − a a 1 + e x 1 d x .
Using the substitution u = − x u = -x u = − x (so d u = − d x du = -dx d u = − d x ), when x = − a x = -a x = − a , u = a u = a u = a ; when x = a x = a x = a , u = − a u = -a u = − a . Thus
I = ∫ a − a 1 1 + e − u ( − d u ) = ∫ − a a 1 1 + e − u d u . I = \int_{a}^{-a} \frac{1}{1+e^{-u}} (-du) = \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+e^{-u}} du. I = ∫ a − a 1 + e − u 1 ( − d u ) = ∫ − a a 1 + e − u 1 d u .
Since 1 1 + e − u = e u e u + 1 \frac{1}{1+e^{-u}} = \frac{e^{u}}{e^{u}+1} 1 + e − u 1 = e u + 1 e u , renaming the dummy variable back to x x x :
I = ∫ − a a e x 1 + e x d x . I = \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{e^{x}}{1+e^{x}} dx. I = ∫ − a a 1 + e x e x d x .
Adding the two expressions for I I I :
2 I = ∫ − a a 1 1 + e x d x + ∫ − a a e x 1 + e x d x = ∫ − a a 1 + e x 1 + e x d x = ∫ − a a 1 d x = 2 a . 2I = \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+e^{x}} dx + \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{e^{x}}{1+e^{x}} dx = \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1+e^{x}}{1+e^{x}} dx = \int_{-a}^{a} 1 \, dx = 2a. 2 I = ∫ − a a 1 + e x 1 d x + ∫ − a a 1 + e x e x d x = ∫ − a a 1 + e x 1 + e x d x = ∫ − a a 1 d x = 2 a .
Therefore I = a I = a I = a .
Part (ii)
First we show that if g g g is continuous and ∫ 0 a g ( x ) d x = 0 \int_{0}^{a} g(x) dx = 0 ∫ 0 a g ( x ) d x = 0 for all a ⩾ 0 a \geqslant 0 a ⩾ 0 , then g ( x ) = 0 g(x) = 0 g ( x ) = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 .
Define G ( a ) = ∫ 0 a g ( x ) d x G(a) = \int_{0}^{a} g(x) dx G ( a ) = ∫ 0 a g ( x ) d x . By hypothesis, G ( a ) = 0 G(a) = 0 G ( a ) = 0 for all a ⩾ 0 a \geqslant 0 a ⩾ 0 . Since g g g is continuous, by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, G G G is differentiable and G ′ ( a ) = g ( a ) G'(a) = g(a) G ′ ( a ) = g ( a ) for all a > 0 a > 0 a > 0 . But G ( a ) = 0 G(a) = 0 G ( a ) = 0 for all a ⩾ 0 a \geqslant 0 a ⩾ 0 implies G ′ ( a ) = 0 G'(a) = 0 G ′ ( a ) = 0 for all a > 0 a > 0 a > 0 . Hence g ( x ) = 0 g(x) = 0 g ( x ) = 0 for all x > 0 x > 0 x > 0 . By continuity of g g g , g ( 0 ) = lim x → 0 + g ( x ) = 0 g(0) = \lim_{x \to 0^+} g(x) = 0 g ( 0 ) = lim x → 0 + g ( x ) = 0 . So g ( x ) = 0 g(x) = 0 g ( x ) = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 .
Now let f f f be continuous with f ( x ) ⩾ 0 f(x) \geqslant 0 f ( x ) ⩾ 0 for all x x x . We show that ∫ − a a 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = a \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = a ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = a for all a ⩾ 0 a \geqslant 0 a ⩾ 0 if and only if 1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) − 1 = 0 \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} - 1 = 0 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 − 1 = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 .
Forward direction (⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ ): Suppose ∫ − a a 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = a \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = a ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = a for all a ⩾ 0 a \geqslant 0 a ⩾ 0 . Split the integral:
∫ − a 0 1 1 + f ( x ) d x + ∫ 0 a 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = a . \int_{-a}^{0} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx + \int_{0}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = a. ∫ − a 0 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x + ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = a .
In the first integral, substitute u = − x u = -x u = − x (so d u = − d x du = -dx d u = − d x ):
∫ − a 0 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ a 0 1 1 + f ( − u ) ( − d u ) = ∫ 0 a 1 1 + f ( − u ) d u . \int_{-a}^{0} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{a}^{0} \frac{1}{1+f(-u)} (-du) = \int_{0}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(-u)} du. ∫ − a 0 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = ∫ a 0 1 + f ( − u ) 1 ( − d u ) = ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( − u ) 1 d u .
Renaming u u u to x x x :
∫ 0 a 1 1 + f ( − x ) d x + ∫ 0 a 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = a . \int_{0}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} dx + \int_{0}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = a. ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( − x ) 1 d x + ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = a .
Combining:
∫ 0 a [ 1 1 + f ( − x ) + 1 1 + f ( x ) ] d x = a = ∫ 0 a 1 d x . \int_{0}^{a} \left[ \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(x)} \right] dx = a = \int_{0}^{a} 1 \, dx. ∫ 0 a [ 1 + f ( − x ) 1 + 1 + f ( x ) 1 ] d x = a = ∫ 0 a 1 d x .
Therefore:
∫ 0 a [ 1 1 + f ( − x ) + 1 1 + f ( x ) − 1 ] d x = 0 for all a ⩾ 0. \int_{0}^{a} \left[ \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(x)} - 1 \right] dx = 0 \quad \text{for all } a \geqslant 0. ∫ 0 a [ 1 + f ( − x ) 1 + 1 + f ( x ) 1 − 1 ] d x = 0 for all a ⩾ 0.
Since f f f is continuous, the integrand g ( x ) = 1 1 + f ( − x ) + 1 1 + f ( x ) − 1 g(x) = \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(x)} - 1 g ( x ) = 1 + f ( − x ) 1 + 1 + f ( x ) 1 − 1 is continuous. By the result just proved, g ( x ) = 0 g(x) = 0 g ( x ) = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 , i.e.,
1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) − 1 = 0 for all x ⩾ 0. \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} - 1 = 0 \quad \text{for all } x \geqslant 0. 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 − 1 = 0 for all x ⩾ 0.
Backward direction (⇐ \Leftarrow ⇐ ): Suppose 1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) − 1 = 0 \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} - 1 = 0 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 − 1 = 0 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 . Then for all a ⩾ 0 a \geqslant 0 a ⩾ 0 :
∫ 0 a [ 1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) − 1 ] d x = 0 , \int_{0}^{a} \left[ \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} - 1 \right] dx = 0, ∫ 0 a [ 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 − 1 ] d x = 0 ,
so ∫ 0 a [ 1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) ] d x = a \int_{0}^{a} \left[ \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} \right] dx = a ∫ 0 a [ 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 ] d x = a . Reversing the substitution u = − x u = -x u = − x on the second integral:
∫ 0 a 1 1 + f ( − x ) d x = ∫ − a 0 1 1 + f ( x ) d x . \int_{0}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} dx = \int_{-a}^{0} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx. ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( − x ) 1 d x = ∫ − a 0 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x .
Therefore ∫ − a a 1 1 + f ( x ) d x = a \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{1+f(x)} dx = a ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) 1 d x = a .
Showing the equivalence with f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 f(x)f(-x) = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 : Starting from 1 1 + f ( x ) + 1 1 + f ( − x ) = 1 \frac{1}{1+f(x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} = 1 1 + f ( x ) 1 + 1 + f ( − x ) 1 = 1 , multiply both sides by ( 1 + f ( x ) ) ( 1 + f ( − x ) ) (1+f(x))(1+f(-x)) ( 1 + f ( x )) ( 1 + f ( − x )) :
( 1 + f ( − x ) ) + ( 1 + f ( x ) ) = ( 1 + f ( x ) ) ( 1 + f ( − x ) ) . (1+f(-x)) + (1+f(x)) = (1+f(x))(1+f(-x)). ( 1 + f ( − x )) + ( 1 + f ( x )) = ( 1 + f ( x )) ( 1 + f ( − x )) .
Expanding the right side:
2 + f ( x ) + f ( − x ) = 1 + f ( x ) + f ( − x ) + f ( x ) f ( − x ) . 2 + f(x) + f(-x) = 1 + f(x) + f(-x) + f(x)f(-x). 2 + f ( x ) + f ( − x ) = 1 + f ( x ) + f ( − x ) + f ( x ) f ( − x ) .
Cancelling f ( x ) + f ( − x ) f(x) + f(-x) f ( x ) + f ( − x ) from both sides:
2 = 1 + f ( x ) f ( − x ) , 2 = 1 + f(x)f(-x), 2 = 1 + f ( x ) f ( − x ) ,
hence f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 f(x)f(-x) = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 for all x x x .
Part (iii)
Let f f f be continuous with f ( x ) ⩾ 0 f(x) \geqslant 0 f ( x ) ⩾ 0 and f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 f(x)f(-x) = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 for all x x x , and let h h h be continuous with h ( x ) = h ( − x ) h(x) = h(-x) h ( x ) = h ( − x ) for all x x x . We show ∫ − a a h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) d x \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{0}^{a} h(x) dx ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) d x .
Split the integral:
∫ − a a h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ − a 0 h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x + ∫ 0 a h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x . \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{-a}^{0} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx + \int_{0}^{a} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx. ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x = ∫ − a 0 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x + ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x .
In the first integral, substitute u = − x u = -x u = − x :
∫ − a 0 h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ a 0 h ( − u ) 1 + f ( − u ) ( − d u ) = ∫ 0 a h ( − u ) 1 + f ( − u ) d u . \int_{-a}^{0} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{a}^{0} \frac{h(-u)}{1+f(-u)} (-du) = \int_{0}^{a} \frac{h(-u)}{1+f(-u)} du. ∫ − a 0 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x = ∫ a 0 1 + f ( − u ) h ( − u ) ( − d u ) = ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( − u ) h ( − u ) d u .
Since h ( − u ) = h ( u ) h(-u) = h(u) h ( − u ) = h ( u ) , this equals ∫ 0 a h ( u ) 1 + f ( − u ) d u \int_{0}^{a} \frac{h(u)}{1+f(-u)} du ∫ 0 a 1 + f ( − u ) h ( u ) d u . Renaming u u u to x x x and combining:
∫ − a a h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) [ 1 1 + f ( − x ) + 1 1 + f ( x ) ] d x . \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{0}^{a} h(x) \left[ \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(x)} \right] dx. ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) [ 1 + f ( − x ) 1 + 1 + f ( x ) 1 ] d x .
By Part (ii), since f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 f(x)f(-x) = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = 1 for all x x x (and f ( x ) ⩾ 0 f(x) \geqslant 0 f ( x ) ⩾ 0 ), we have 1 1 + f ( − x ) + 1 1 + f ( x ) = 1 \frac{1}{1+f(-x)} + \frac{1}{1+f(x)} = 1 1 + f ( − x ) 1 + 1 + f ( x ) 1 = 1 for all x ⩾ 0 x \geqslant 0 x ⩾ 0 . Therefore:
∫ − a a h ( x ) 1 + f ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) ⋅ 1 d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) d x . \int_{-a}^{a} \frac{h(x)}{1+f(x)} dx = \int_{0}^{a} h(x) \cdot 1 \, dx = \int_{0}^{a} h(x) dx. ∫ − a a 1 + f ( x ) h ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) ⋅ 1 d x = ∫ 0 a h ( x ) d x .
Part (iv)
We evaluate ∫ − 1 2 π 1 2 π e − x cos x cosh x d x \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{e^{-x} \cos x}{\cosh x} dx ∫ − 2 1 π 2 1 π c o s h x e − x c o s x d x .
First, rewrite the integrand using cosh x = e x + e − x 2 \cosh x = \frac{e^{x} + e^{-x}}{2} cosh x = 2 e x + e − x :
e − x cos x cosh x = e − x cos x e x + e − x 2 = 2 e − x cos x e x + e − x . \frac{e^{-x} \cos x}{\cosh x} = \frac{e^{-x} \cos x}{\frac{e^{x} + e^{-x}}{2}} = \frac{2e^{-x} \cos x}{e^{x} + e^{-x}}. c o s h x e − x c o s x = 2 e x + e − x e − x c o s x = e x + e − x 2 e − x c o s x .
Multiplying numerator and denominator by e x e^{x} e x :
2 e − x cos x e x + e − x ⋅ e x e x = 2 cos x e 2 x + 1 = 2 cos x 1 + e 2 x . \frac{2e^{-x} \cos x}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \cdot \frac{e^{x}}{e^{x}} = \frac{2 \cos x}{e^{2x} + 1} = \frac{2\cos x}{1 + e^{2x}}. e x + e − x 2 e − x c o s x ⋅ e x e x = e 2 x + 1 2 c o s x = 1 + e 2 x 2 c o s x .
We identify h ( x ) = 2 cos x h(x) = 2\cos x h ( x ) = 2 cos x and f ( x ) = e 2 x f(x) = e^{2x} f ( x ) = e 2 x , and verify the conditions of Part (iii):
f ( x ) = e 2 x > 0 f(x) = e^{2x} > 0 f ( x ) = e 2 x > 0 for all x x x , so f ( x ) ⩾ 0 f(x) \geqslant 0 f ( x ) ⩾ 0 .
f ( x ) f ( − x ) = e 2 x ⋅ e − 2 x = 1 f(x)f(-x) = e^{2x} \cdot e^{-2x} = 1 f ( x ) f ( − x ) = e 2 x ⋅ e − 2 x = 1 for all x x x .
h ( x ) = 2 cos x h(x) = 2\cos x h ( x ) = 2 cos x is continuous and h ( − x ) = 2 cos ( − x ) = 2 cos x = h ( x ) h(-x) = 2\cos(-x) = 2\cos x = h(x) h ( − x ) = 2 cos ( − x ) = 2 cos x = h ( x ) , so h h h is even.
All conditions are satisfied. Applying Part (iii) with a = π 2 a = \frac{\pi}{2} a = 2 π :
∫ − π 2 π 2 2 cos x 1 + e 2 x d x = ∫ 0 π 2 2 cos x d x = 2 [ sin x ] 0 π 2 = 2 ( 1 − 0 ) = 2. \int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{2\cos x}{1 + e^{2x}} dx = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} 2\cos x \, dx = 2[\sin x]_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} = 2(1 - 0) = 2. ∫ − 2 π 2 π 1 + e 2 x 2 c o s x d x = ∫ 0 2 π 2 cos x d x = 2 [ sin x ] 0 2 π = 2 ( 1 − 0 ) = 2.
Therefore:
∫ − 1 2 π 1 2 π e − x cos x cosh x d x = 2. \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{e^{-x} \cos x}{\cosh x} dx = 2. ∫ − 2 1 π 2 1 π c o s h x e − x c o s x d x = 2.
Examiner Notes
第三成功题目,平均分接近满分的一半。第(i)部分常见错误是积分∫1/(1+eˣ)dx直接得到ln(1+eˣ)而非正确简化,以及推导步骤不充分。第(ii)部分最难,关键错误警示:∫₋ₐᵃg(x)dx=0不能直接推出g(x)=0(g(x)=sin x是反例),必须使用微积分基本定理。第(iv)部分必须使用前面部分的结果(题目要求”hence”),否则不给分。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Hard | Marks : 20
6 (i) Show that when α \alpha α is small, cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ − α sin θ − 1 2 α 2 cos θ \cos(\theta + \alpha) - \cos \theta \approx -\alpha \sin \theta - \frac{1}{2} \alpha^2 \cos \theta cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ − α sin θ − 2 1 α 2 cos θ .
Find the limit as α → 0 \alpha \to 0 α → 0 of
sin ( θ + α ) − sin θ cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ (*) \frac{\sin(\theta + \alpha) - \sin \theta}{\cos(\theta + \alpha) - \cos \theta} \qquad \text{(*)} c o s ( θ + α ) − c o s θ s i n ( θ + α ) − s i n θ (*)
in the case sin θ ≠ 0 \sin \theta \neq 0 sin θ = 0 .
In the case sin θ = 0 \sin \theta = 0 sin θ = 0 , what happens to the value of expression (∗ * ∗ ) when α → 0 \alpha \to 0 α → 0 ?
(ii) A circle C 1 C_1 C 1 of radius a a a rolls without slipping in an anti-clockwise direction on a fixed circle C 2 C_2 C 2 with centre at the origin O O O and radius ( n − 1 ) a (n - 1)a ( n − 1 ) a , where n n n is an integer greater than 2. The point P P P is fixed on C 1 C_1 C 1 . Initially the centre of C 1 C_1 C 1 is at ( n a , 0 ) (na, 0) ( na , 0 ) and P P P is at ( ( n + 1 ) a , 0 ) ((n + 1)a, 0) (( n + 1 ) a , 0 ) .
(a) Let Q Q Q be the point of contact of C 1 C_1 C 1 and C 2 C_2 C 2 at any time in the rolling motion. Show that when O Q OQ O Q makes an angle θ \theta θ , measured anticlockwise, with the positive x x x -axis, the x x x -coordinate of P P P is x ( θ ) = a ( n cos θ + cos n θ ) x(\theta) = a(n \cos \theta + \cos n\theta) x ( θ ) = a ( n cos θ + cos n θ ) , and find the corresponding expression for the y y y -coordinate, y ( θ ) y(\theta) y ( θ ) , of P P P .
(b) Find the values of θ \theta θ for which the distance O P OP O P is ( n − 1 ) a (n - 1)a ( n − 1 ) a .
(c) Let θ 0 = 1 n − 1 π \theta_0 = \frac{1}{n - 1} \pi θ 0 = n − 1 1 π . Find the limit as α → 0 \alpha \to 0 α → 0 of
y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) . \frac{y(\theta_0 + \alpha) - y(\theta_0)}{x(\theta_0 + \alpha) - x(\theta_0)}. x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) .
Hence show that, at the point ( x ( θ 0 ) , y ( θ 0 ) ) (x(\theta_0), y(\theta_0)) ( x ( θ 0 ) , y ( θ 0 )) , the tangent to the curve traced out by P P P is parallel to O P OP O P .
Hint
解题思路概述:
本题分为两部分:(i) 小量近似与三角函数极限;(ii) 滚动圆的参数方程(外摆线),涉及几何推理、代数化简和极限计算。
Part (i) 第一问(Show that):
利用展开 cos(θ + α) = cos θ cos α - sin θ sin α,取小量近似 cos α ≈ 1 - α²/2,sin α ≈ α:
cos(θ + α) - cos θ ≈ cos θ(1 - α²/2) - sin θ · α - cos θ = -α sin θ - (α²/2) cos θ
Part (i) 第二问(sin θ ≠ 0 的情况):
类似地,sin(θ + α) - sin θ ≈ α cos θ - (α²/2) sin θ。
lim_{α→0} [sin(θ+α)-sinθ]/[cos(θ+α)-cosθ] = lim_{α→0} [α cos θ - (α²/2) sin θ]/[-α sin θ - (α²/2) cos θ] = lim_{α→0} [cos θ - (α/2) sin θ]/[-sin θ - (α/2) cos θ] = -cot θ
(替代方法:L’Hôpital 法则直接求导得 cos(θ+α)/(-sin(θ+α)) → -cot θ)
Part (i) 第三问(sin θ = 0 的情况):
当 sin θ = 0 时,分子的 α cos θ 项不为零,分母 -α sin θ 为零:
lim_{α→0} (α cos θ)/(-(α²/2) cos θ) = lim_{α→0} (-2)/α
因此当 α → +0 时趋向 -∞,当 α → -0 时趋向 +∞。
Part (ii)(a):
C₂ 上初始接触点 Q₀,当 OQ 转过角度 θ 时,弧 Q₀Q 在 C₂ 上的长度为 (n-1)aθ。由于无滑动滚动,C₁ 上滚过的弧长也等于 (n-1)aθ。在 C₁ 上这对应角度 (n-1)aθ/a = (n-1)θ。
C₁ 的中心 T 的位置为 T = (na cos θ, na sin θ)。P 相对于 T 的方向角为 θ + (n-1)θ = nθ。
x(θ) = na cos θ + a cos nθ = a(n cos θ + cos nθ)
y(θ) = na sin θ + a sin nθ = a(n sin θ + sin nθ)
Part (ii)(b):
OP = (n-1)a 要求:
(n cos θ + cos nθ)² + (n sin θ + sin nθ)² = (n-1)²
展开得 n² + 1 + 2n cos(n-1)θ = n² - 2n + 1,即 cos(n-1)θ = -1。
因此 (n-1)θ = (2r+1)π,r = 0, 1, 2, …
θ = (2r+1)π/(n-1),r = 0, 1, 2, …
Part (ii)(c):
设 θ₀ = π/(n-1),需要求:
lim_{α→0} [y(θ₀+α) - y(θ₀)]/[x(θ₀+α) - x(θ₀)]
利用小量展开,分子和分母分别化为:
[cos θ₀ + cos nθ₀ - (α/2)(sin θ₀ + n sin nθ₀)]/[-(sin θ₀ + sin nθ₀) - (α/2)(cos θ₀ + n cos nθ₀)]
关键观察:因为 (n-1)θ₀ = π,利用和差化积:
cos θ₀ + cos nθ₀ = 2cos((n+1)θ₀/2)cos((n-1)θ₀/2) = 2cos((n+1)θ₀/2)cos(π/2) = 0
sin θ₀ + sin nθ₀ = 2sin((n+1)θ₀/2)cos((n-1)θ₀/2) = 0
利用加法公式 cos nθ₀ = cos((n-1)θ₀ + θ₀) = -cos θ₀,sin nθ₀ = -sin θ₀:
sin θ₀ + n sin nθ₀ = (1-n) sin θ₀
cos θ₀ + n cos nθ₀ = (1-n) cos θ₀
因此极限为:[(1-n) sin θ₀]/[(1-n) cos θ₀] = tan θ₀
这表明在点 (x(θ₀), y(θ₀)) 处,曲线的切线与 OP 平行。
常见错误(来自 Examiner Report):
Part (i):除以一个未必非零的量。
Part (ii):缺少图示或图示过小;未说明 x(θ) 中第二项 cos nθ 的来源。
Part (ii)(b):得出 cos(n-1)θ = -1 后忘记考虑周期性。
Part (ii)(c):错误地将极限当作 0/0 直接计算 cotangent。
Model Solution
Part (i)
Show that cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ − α sin θ − 1 2 α 2 cos θ \cos(\theta + \alpha) - \cos\theta \approx -\alpha\sin\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\cos\theta cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ − α sin θ − 2 1 α 2 cos θ when α \alpha α is small.
Using the addition formula cos ( θ + α ) = cos θ cos α − sin θ sin α \cos(\theta + \alpha) = \cos\theta\cos\alpha - \sin\theta\sin\alpha cos ( θ + α ) = cos θ cos α − sin θ sin α , and the small-angle approximations cos α ≈ 1 − α 2 2 \cos\alpha \approx 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{2} cos α ≈ 1 − 2 α 2 , sin α ≈ α \sin\alpha \approx \alpha sin α ≈ α :
cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ cos θ ( 1 − α 2 2 ) − sin θ ⋅ α − cos θ = − α sin θ − 1 2 α 2 cos θ . \cos(\theta + \alpha) - \cos\theta \approx \cos\theta\left(1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{2}\right) - \sin\theta \cdot \alpha - \cos\theta = -\alpha\sin\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\cos\theta. cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ cos θ ( 1 − 2 α 2 ) − sin θ ⋅ α − cos θ = − α sin θ − 2 1 α 2 cos θ .
Find the limit when sin θ ≠ 0 \sin\theta \neq 0 sin θ = 0 .
Similarly, sin ( θ + α ) = sin θ cos α + cos θ sin α \sin(\theta + \alpha) = \sin\theta\cos\alpha + \cos\theta\sin\alpha sin ( θ + α ) = sin θ cos α + cos θ sin α , so:
sin ( θ + α ) − sin θ ≈ sin θ ( 1 − α 2 2 ) + cos θ ⋅ α − sin θ = α cos θ − 1 2 α 2 sin θ . \sin(\theta + \alpha) - \sin\theta \approx \sin\theta\left(1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{2}\right) + \cos\theta \cdot \alpha - \sin\theta = \alpha\cos\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\sin\theta. sin ( θ + α ) − sin θ ≈ sin θ ( 1 − 2 α 2 ) + cos θ ⋅ α − sin θ = α cos θ − 2 1 α 2 sin θ .
Therefore:
sin ( θ + α ) − sin θ cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ α cos θ − 1 2 α 2 sin θ − α sin θ − 1 2 α 2 cos θ . \frac{\sin(\theta+\alpha) - \sin\theta}{\cos(\theta+\alpha) - \cos\theta} \approx \frac{\alpha\cos\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\sin\theta}{-\alpha\sin\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\cos\theta}. c o s ( θ + α ) − c o s θ s i n ( θ + α ) − s i n θ ≈ − α s i n θ − 2 1 α 2 c o s θ α c o s θ − 2 1 α 2 s i n θ .
Dividing numerator and denominator by α \alpha α (valid since α ≠ 0 \alpha \neq 0 α = 0 ):
cos θ − α 2 sin θ − sin θ − α 2 cos θ . \frac{\cos\theta - \frac{\alpha}{2}\sin\theta}{-\sin\theta - \frac{\alpha}{2}\cos\theta}. − s i n θ − 2 α c o s θ c o s θ − 2 α s i n θ .
Taking α → 0 \alpha \to 0 α → 0 :
lim α → 0 sin ( θ + α ) − sin θ cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ = cos θ − sin θ = − cot θ . \lim_{\alpha \to 0} \frac{\sin(\theta+\alpha) - \sin\theta}{\cos(\theta+\alpha) - \cos\theta} = \frac{\cos\theta}{-\sin\theta} = -\cot\theta. lim α → 0 c o s ( θ + α ) − c o s θ s i n ( θ + α ) − s i n θ = − s i n θ c o s θ = − cot θ .
When sin θ = 0 \sin\theta = 0 sin θ = 0 :
In this case cos θ = ± 1 \cos\theta = \pm 1 cos θ = ± 1 (so cos θ ≠ 0 \cos\theta \neq 0 cos θ = 0 ). The numerator is α cos θ − 1 2 α 2 sin θ = α cos θ \alpha\cos\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\sin\theta = \alpha\cos\theta α cos θ − 2 1 α 2 sin θ = α cos θ (first-order in α \alpha α ), while the denominator is − α sin θ − 1 2 α 2 cos θ = − 1 2 α 2 cos θ -\alpha\sin\theta - \frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\cos\theta = -\frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\cos\theta − α sin θ − 2 1 α 2 cos θ = − 2 1 α 2 cos θ (second-order in α \alpha α ). Thus:
sin ( θ + α ) − sin θ cos ( θ + α ) − cos θ ≈ α cos θ − 1 2 α 2 cos θ = − 2 α . \frac{\sin(\theta+\alpha) - \sin\theta}{\cos(\theta+\alpha) - \cos\theta} \approx \frac{\alpha\cos\theta}{-\frac{1}{2}\alpha^2\cos\theta} = \frac{-2}{\alpha}. c o s ( θ + α ) − c o s θ s i n ( θ + α ) − s i n θ ≈ − 2 1 α 2 c o s θ α c o s θ = α − 2 .
As α → 0 + \alpha \to 0^+ α → 0 + , this tends to − ∞ -\infty − ∞ ; as α → 0 − \alpha \to 0^- α → 0 − , this tends to + ∞ +\infty + ∞ . The expression has no finite limit.
Part (ii)(a)
When the rolling circle C 1 C_1 C 1 has rolled so that the contact point Q Q Q on C 2 C_2 C 2 is at angle θ \theta θ from the positive x x x -axis, the arc from the initial contact point to Q Q Q on C 2 C_2 C 2 has length ( n − 1 ) a θ (n-1)a\theta ( n − 1 ) a θ . By the no-slip condition, this equals the arc rolled on C 1 C_1 C 1 , which subtends angle ( n − 1 ) a θ a = ( n − 1 ) θ \frac{(n-1)a\theta}{a} = (n-1)\theta a ( n − 1 ) a θ = ( n − 1 ) θ at the centre of C 1 C_1 C 1 .
The centre T T T of C 1 C_1 C 1 is at distance n a na na from O O O (since the radii of C 1 C_1 C 1 and C 2 C_2 C 2 are a a a and ( n − 1 ) a (n-1)a ( n − 1 ) a respectively), so T = ( n a cos θ , n a sin θ ) T = (na\cos\theta, \, na\sin\theta) T = ( na cos θ , na sin θ ) .
Initially, P P P was on the positive x x x -side of T T T . After rolling, P P P has rotated by angle ( n − 1 ) θ (n-1)\theta ( n − 1 ) θ relative to T T T in the same direction as the rolling. The direction from T T T to P P P relative to the positive x x x -axis is θ + ( n − 1 ) θ = n θ \theta + (n-1)\theta = n\theta θ + ( n − 1 ) θ = n θ . Therefore:
x ( θ ) = n a cos θ + a cos ( n θ ) = a ( n cos θ + cos n θ ) , x(\theta) = na\cos\theta + a\cos(n\theta) = a(n\cos\theta + \cos n\theta), x ( θ ) = na cos θ + a cos ( n θ ) = a ( n cos θ + cos n θ ) ,
y ( θ ) = n a sin θ + a sin ( n θ ) = a ( n sin θ + sin n θ ) . y(\theta) = na\sin\theta + a\sin(n\theta) = a(n\sin\theta + \sin n\theta). y ( θ ) = na sin θ + a sin ( n θ ) = a ( n sin θ + sin n θ ) .
Part (ii)(b)
We need O P = ( n − 1 ) a OP = (n-1)a O P = ( n − 1 ) a , i.e., x ( θ ) 2 + y ( θ ) 2 = ( n − 1 ) 2 a 2 x(\theta)^2 + y(\theta)^2 = (n-1)^2 a^2 x ( θ ) 2 + y ( θ ) 2 = ( n − 1 ) 2 a 2 . Dividing by a 2 a^2 a 2 :
( n cos θ + cos n θ ) 2 + ( n sin θ + sin n θ ) 2 = ( n − 1 ) 2 . (n\cos\theta + \cos n\theta)^2 + (n\sin\theta + \sin n\theta)^2 = (n-1)^2. ( n cos θ + cos n θ ) 2 + ( n sin θ + sin n θ ) 2 = ( n − 1 ) 2 .
Expanding the left side:
n 2 cos 2 θ + 2 n cos θ cos n θ + cos 2 n θ + n 2 sin 2 θ + 2 n sin θ sin n θ + sin 2 n θ n^2\cos^2\theta + 2n\cos\theta\cos n\theta + \cos^2 n\theta + n^2\sin^2\theta + 2n\sin\theta\sin n\theta + \sin^2 n\theta n 2 cos 2 θ + 2 n cos θ cos n θ + cos 2 n θ + n 2 sin 2 θ + 2 n sin θ sin n θ + sin 2 n θ
= n 2 + 1 + 2 n ( cos θ cos n θ + sin θ sin n θ ) = n 2 + 1 + 2 n cos ( n − 1 ) θ . = n^2 + 1 + 2n(\cos\theta\cos n\theta + \sin\theta\sin n\theta) = n^2 + 1 + 2n\cos(n-1)\theta. = n 2 + 1 + 2 n ( cos θ cos n θ + sin θ sin n θ ) = n 2 + 1 + 2 n cos ( n − 1 ) θ .
Setting this equal to ( n − 1 ) 2 = n 2 − 2 n + 1 (n-1)^2 = n^2 - 2n + 1 ( n − 1 ) 2 = n 2 − 2 n + 1 :
n 2 + 1 + 2 n cos ( n − 1 ) θ = n 2 − 2 n + 1 , n^2 + 1 + 2n\cos(n-1)\theta = n^2 - 2n + 1, n 2 + 1 + 2 n cos ( n − 1 ) θ = n 2 − 2 n + 1 ,
2 n cos ( n − 1 ) θ = − 2 n , 2n\cos(n-1)\theta = -2n, 2 n cos ( n − 1 ) θ = − 2 n ,
cos ( n − 1 ) θ = − 1. \cos(n-1)\theta = -1. cos ( n − 1 ) θ = − 1.
Therefore ( n − 1 ) θ = ( 2 r + 1 ) π (n-1)\theta = (2r+1)\pi ( n − 1 ) θ = ( 2 r + 1 ) π for integer r r r , giving:
θ = ( 2 r + 1 ) π n − 1 , r = 0 , 1 , 2 , … \theta = \frac{(2r+1)\pi}{n-1}, \qquad r = 0, 1, 2, \ldots θ = n − 1 ( 2 r + 1 ) π , r = 0 , 1 , 2 , …
Part (ii)(c)
Let θ 0 = π n − 1 \theta_0 = \frac{\pi}{n-1} θ 0 = n − 1 π , so ( n − 1 ) θ 0 = π (n-1)\theta_0 = \pi ( n − 1 ) θ 0 = π . We first compute x ( θ 0 ) x(\theta_0) x ( θ 0 ) and y ( θ 0 ) y(\theta_0) y ( θ 0 ) .
Since ( n − 1 ) θ 0 = π (n-1)\theta_0 = \pi ( n − 1 ) θ 0 = π , we have n θ 0 = π + θ 0 n\theta_0 = \pi + \theta_0 n θ 0 = π + θ 0 , so cos n θ 0 = cos ( π + θ 0 ) = − cos θ 0 \cos n\theta_0 = \cos(\pi + \theta_0) = -\cos\theta_0 cos n θ 0 = cos ( π + θ 0 ) = − cos θ 0 and sin n θ 0 = sin ( π + θ 0 ) = − sin θ 0 \sin n\theta_0 = \sin(\pi + \theta_0) = -\sin\theta_0 sin n θ 0 = sin ( π + θ 0 ) = − sin θ 0 . Therefore:
x ( θ 0 ) = a ( n cos θ 0 − cos θ 0 ) = a ( n − 1 ) cos θ 0 , x(\theta_0) = a(n\cos\theta_0 - \cos\theta_0) = a(n-1)\cos\theta_0, x ( θ 0 ) = a ( n cos θ 0 − cos θ 0 ) = a ( n − 1 ) cos θ 0 ,
y ( θ 0 ) = a ( n sin θ 0 − sin θ 0 ) = a ( n − 1 ) sin θ 0 . y(\theta_0) = a(n\sin\theta_0 - \sin\theta_0) = a(n-1)\sin\theta_0. y ( θ 0 ) = a ( n sin θ 0 − sin θ 0 ) = a ( n − 1 ) sin θ 0 .
Now we expand x ( θ 0 + α ) x(\theta_0 + \alpha) x ( θ 0 + α ) and y ( θ 0 + α ) y(\theta_0 + \alpha) y ( θ 0 + α ) for small α \alpha α .
Using cos ( θ 0 + α ) = cos θ 0 cos α − sin θ 0 sin α \cos(\theta_0 + \alpha) = \cos\theta_0\cos\alpha - \sin\theta_0\sin\alpha cos ( θ 0 + α ) = cos θ 0 cos α − sin θ 0 sin α and cos ( n θ 0 + n α ) = cos n θ 0 cos n α − sin n θ 0 sin n α = − cos θ 0 cos n α + sin θ 0 sin n α \cos(n\theta_0 + n\alpha) = \cos n\theta_0\cos n\alpha - \sin n\theta_0\sin n\alpha = -\cos\theta_0\cos n\alpha + \sin\theta_0\sin n\alpha cos ( n θ 0 + n α ) = cos n θ 0 cos n α − sin n θ 0 sin n α = − cos θ 0 cos n α + sin θ 0 sin n α :
x ( θ 0 + α ) = a [ n ( cos θ 0 cos α − sin θ 0 sin α ) + ( − cos θ 0 cos n α + sin θ 0 sin n α ) ] x(\theta_0 + \alpha) = a\bigl[n(\cos\theta_0\cos\alpha - \sin\theta_0\sin\alpha) + (-\cos\theta_0\cos n\alpha + \sin\theta_0\sin n\alpha)\bigr] x ( θ 0 + α ) = a [ n ( cos θ 0 cos α − sin θ 0 sin α ) + ( − cos θ 0 cos n α + sin θ 0 sin n α ) ]
= a [ cos θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α ) − sin θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] . = a\bigl[\cos\theta_0(n\cos\alpha - \cos n\alpha) - \sin\theta_0(n\sin\alpha - \sin n\alpha)\bigr]. = a [ cos θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α ) − sin θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] .
Similarly, using sin ( θ 0 + α ) = sin θ 0 cos α + cos θ 0 sin α \sin(\theta_0 + \alpha) = \sin\theta_0\cos\alpha + \cos\theta_0\sin\alpha sin ( θ 0 + α ) = sin θ 0 cos α + cos θ 0 sin α and sin n θ 0 = − sin θ 0 \sin n\theta_0 = -\sin\theta_0 sin n θ 0 = − sin θ 0 :
y ( θ 0 + α ) = a [ sin θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α ) + cos θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] . y(\theta_0 + \alpha) = a\bigl[\sin\theta_0(n\cos\alpha - \cos n\alpha) + \cos\theta_0(n\sin\alpha - \sin n\alpha)\bigr]. y ( θ 0 + α ) = a [ sin θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α ) + cos θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] .
The differences from the values at θ 0 \theta_0 θ 0 are:
x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) = a [ cos θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α − ( n − 1 ) ) − sin θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] , x(\theta_0 + \alpha) - x(\theta_0) = a\bigl[\cos\theta_0(n\cos\alpha - \cos n\alpha - (n-1)) - \sin\theta_0(n\sin\alpha - \sin n\alpha)\bigr], x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) = a [ cos θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α − ( n − 1 )) − sin θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] ,
y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) = a [ sin θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α − ( n − 1 ) ) + cos θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] . y(\theta_0 + \alpha) - y(\theta_0) = a\bigl[\sin\theta_0(n\cos\alpha - \cos n\alpha - (n-1)) + \cos\theta_0(n\sin\alpha - \sin n\alpha)\bigr]. y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) = a [ sin θ 0 ( n cos α − cos n α − ( n − 1 )) + cos θ 0 ( n sin α − sin n α ) ] .
For small α \alpha α : cos α ≈ 1 − α 2 2 \cos\alpha \approx 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{2} cos α ≈ 1 − 2 α 2 , sin α ≈ α \sin\alpha \approx \alpha sin α ≈ α , cos n α ≈ 1 − n 2 α 2 2 \cos n\alpha \approx 1 - \frac{n^2\alpha^2}{2} cos n α ≈ 1 − 2 n 2 α 2 , sin n α ≈ n α \sin n\alpha \approx n\alpha sin n α ≈ n α . So:
n cos α − cos n α − ( n − 1 ) ≈ n ( 1 − α 2 2 ) − ( 1 − n 2 α 2 2 ) − ( n − 1 ) = n ( n − 1 ) α 2 2 , n\cos\alpha - \cos n\alpha - (n-1) \approx n\left(1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{2}\right) - \left(1 - \frac{n^2\alpha^2}{2}\right) - (n-1) = \frac{n(n-1)\alpha^2}{2}, n cos α − cos n α − ( n − 1 ) ≈ n ( 1 − 2 α 2 ) − ( 1 − 2 n 2 α 2 ) − ( n − 1 ) = 2 n ( n − 1 ) α 2 ,
n sin α − sin n α ≈ n α − n α = 0. n\sin\alpha - \sin n\alpha \approx n\alpha - n\alpha = 0. n sin α − sin n α ≈ n α − n α = 0.
The second expression vanishes to first order; more precisely, n sin α − sin n α = n α − n α 3 6 − n α + n 3 α 3 6 + ⋯ = n ( n 2 − 1 ) α 3 6 + ⋯ n\sin\alpha - \sin n\alpha = n\alpha - \frac{n\alpha^3}{6} - n\alpha + \frac{n^3\alpha^3}{6} + \cdots = \frac{n(n^2-1)\alpha^3}{6} + \cdots n sin α − sin n α = n α − 6 n α 3 − n α + 6 n 3 α 3 + ⋯ = 6 n ( n 2 − 1 ) α 3 + ⋯ , which is third-order. So the dominant contributions come from the α 2 \alpha^2 α 2 terms:
x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) ≈ a ⋅ cos θ 0 ⋅ n ( n − 1 ) α 2 2 , x(\theta_0 + \alpha) - x(\theta_0) \approx a \cdot \cos\theta_0 \cdot \frac{n(n-1)\alpha^2}{2}, x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) ≈ a ⋅ cos θ 0 ⋅ 2 n ( n − 1 ) α 2 ,
y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) ≈ a ⋅ sin θ 0 ⋅ n ( n − 1 ) α 2 2 . y(\theta_0 + \alpha) - y(\theta_0) \approx a \cdot \sin\theta_0 \cdot \frac{n(n-1)\alpha^2}{2}. y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) ≈ a ⋅ sin θ 0 ⋅ 2 n ( n − 1 ) α 2 .
Taking the ratio:
lim α → 0 y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) = sin θ 0 cos θ 0 = tan θ 0 . \lim_{\alpha \to 0} \frac{y(\theta_0 + \alpha) - y(\theta_0)}{x(\theta_0 + \alpha) - x(\theta_0)} = \frac{\sin\theta_0}{\cos\theta_0} = \tan\theta_0. lim α → 0 x ( θ 0 + α ) − x ( θ 0 ) y ( θ 0 + α ) − y ( θ 0 ) = c o s θ 0 s i n θ 0 = tan θ 0 .
Showing the tangent is parallel to O P OP O P :
At θ = θ 0 \theta = \theta_0 θ = θ 0 , the point on the curve is P = ( a ( n − 1 ) cos θ 0 , a ( n − 1 ) sin θ 0 ) P = (a(n-1)\cos\theta_0, \, a(n-1)\sin\theta_0) P = ( a ( n − 1 ) cos θ 0 , a ( n − 1 ) sin θ 0 ) . The vector O P OP O P has direction ( cos θ 0 , sin θ 0 ) (\cos\theta_0, \sin\theta_0) ( cos θ 0 , sin θ 0 ) , so the slope of O P OP O P is sin θ 0 cos θ 0 = tan θ 0 \frac{\sin\theta_0}{\cos\theta_0} = \tan\theta_0 c o s θ 0 s i n θ 0 = tan θ 0 .
The limit computed above is the slope of the tangent to the curve at this point, which also equals tan θ 0 \tan\theta_0 tan θ 0 . Since both slopes are equal, the tangent to the curve at ( x ( θ 0 ) , y ( θ 0 ) ) (x(\theta_0), y(\theta_0)) ( x ( θ 0 ) , y ( θ 0 )) is parallel to O P OP O P .
Examiner Notes
约半数考生尝试,是得分最低的题目之一(平均分约1/4)。常见问题:图形缺失或过小且遗漏关键细节、未说明参数方程第二项的来源、第(b)部分忘记处理周期性(加2kπ)、第(c)部分错误地对0/0型极限直接求值后声称余切是答案。部分考生能正确识别零点并有效处理三角函数。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Challenging | Marks : 20
7 Let n be a vector of unit length in three dimensions. For each vector r , f(r ) is defined by f(r ) = n × r .
(i) Given that
n = ( a b c ) and r = ( x y z ) , \mathbf{n} = \begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \\ c \end{pmatrix} \text{ and } \mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix}, n = a b c and r = x y z ,
show that the x x x -component of f(f(r )) is − x ( b 2 + c 2 ) + a b y + a c z -x(b^2 + c^2) + aby + acz − x ( b 2 + c 2 ) + ab y + a cz . Show further that
f(f ( r ) ) = ( n ⋅ r ) n − r . \text{f(f}(\mathbf{r})) = (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n} - \mathbf{r}. f(f ( r )) = ( n ⋅ r ) n − r .
Explain, by means of a diagram, how f(f(r )) is related to n and r .
(ii) Let R R R be the point with position vector r and P P P be the point with position vector g(r ), where g is defined by
g ( s ) = s + sin θ f ( s ) + ( 1 − cos θ ) f(f ( s ) ) . \text{g}(\mathbf{s}) = \mathbf{s} + \sin \theta \, \text{f}(\mathbf{s}) + (1 - \cos \theta) \, \text{f(f}(\mathbf{s})). g ( s ) = s + sin θ f ( s ) + ( 1 − cos θ ) f(f ( s )) .
By considering g(n ) and g(r ) when r is perpendicular to n , state, with justification, the geometric transformation which maps R R R onto P P P .
(iii) Let R R R be the point with position vector r and Q Q Q be the point with position vector h(r ), where h is defined by
h ( s ) = − s − 2 f(f ( s ) ) . \text{h}(\mathbf{s}) = -\mathbf{s} - 2 \, \text{f(f}(\mathbf{s})). h ( s ) = − s − 2 f(f ( s )) .
State, with justification, the geometric transformation which maps R R R onto Q Q Q .
Hint
解题思路: 本题考察向量叉积的性质、Rodrigues 旋转公式和反射变换。核心恒等式是 n × (n × r) = (n·r)n − r(当 |n|=1 时)。
Part (i):证明 f(f(r)) = (n·r)n − r 并用图解释
步骤1:计算 f(r) = n × r
f(r) = (a, b, c)ᵀ × (x, y, z)ᵀ = (bz − cy, cx − az, ay − bx)ᵀ
步骤2:计算 f(f(r)) 的 x 分量
f(f(r)) 的 x 分量 = b(ay − bx) − c(cx − az) = −x(b² + c²) + aby + acz
步骤3:利用 |n|=1 简化
由于 a² + b² + c² = 1:
−x(b² + c²) + aby + acz = −x(a² + b² + c²) + a(ax + by + cz) = −x + a(n·r)
同理 y 分量为 −y + b(n·r),z 分量为 −z + c(n·r)。
因此 f(f(r)) = −r + (n·r)n = (n·r)n − r ✓
几何解释:r 可分解为平行于 n 的分量 (n·r)n 和垂直于 n 的分量 r − (n·r)n。f(f(r)) = (n·r)n − r = −(r − (n·r)n),即 r 的垂直分量取反。
Part (ii):旋转
步骤1:计算 g(n)
g(n) = n + sin θ(n × n) + (1 − cos θ)((n·n)n − n) = n + 0 + (1 − cos θ)(n − n) = n
→ n 方向的向量在变换下不变。
步骤2:计算 g(r),其中 r ⊥ n
当 r ⊥ n 时,n·r = 0,所以 f(f(r)) = −r。
g(r) = r + sin θ(n × r) + (1 − cos θ)(−r) = r cos θ + sin θ(n × r)
步骤3:判断几何变换
r、n×r 都垂直于 n,且 |r| = |n×r|(因为 |n|=1),两者夹角为 θ。因此 g(r) 是将 r 绕 n 轴逆时针旋转角度 θ。
结论:g 表示绕 n 轴逆时针旋转角度 θ 的旋转变换。
Part (iii):反射
步骤1:化简 h(s)
h(s) = −s − 2f(f(s)) = −s − 2((n·s)n − s) = s − 2(n·s)n
步骤2:验证变换性质
h(n) = n − 2(n·n)n = n − 2n = −n(n 方向反向)
若 r ⊥ n,则 h(r) = r − 2(n·r)n = r(垂直分量不变)
h(n × r) = n × r − 2(n·(n × r))n = n × r(不变)
结论:h 表示关于过原点且垂直于 n 的平面的反射变换。
常见错误(来自 Examiner Report):
Part (i):向量叉积计算错误,尤其是符号。
Part (ii):未能正确解释 g 的几何意义。
Part (iii):未能将 h 与反射联系起来。
Model Solution
Part (i)
We compute f(r ) = n x r using the determinant formula:
n × r = ∣ i j k a b c x y z ∣ = ( b z − c y c x − a z a y − b x ) \mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{r} = \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ a & b & c \\ x & y & z \end{vmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} bz - cy \\ cx - az \\ ay - bx \end{pmatrix} n × r = i a x j b y k c z = b z − cy c x − a z a y − b x
Now we compute f(f(r )) = n x (f(r )). The x x x -component is:
b ( a y − b x ) − c ( c x − a z ) = a b y − b 2 x − c 2 x + a c z = − x ( b 2 + c 2 ) + a b y + a c z b(ay - bx) - c(cx - az) = aby - b^2 x - c^2 x + acz = -x(b^2 + c^2) + aby + acz b ( a y − b x ) − c ( c x − a z ) = ab y − b 2 x − c 2 x + a cz = − x ( b 2 + c 2 ) + ab y + a cz
This establishes the first result. Now we use ∣ n ∣ = 1 |\mathbf{n}| = 1 ∣ n ∣ = 1 , i.e., a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 1 a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 1 a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 1 , so b 2 + c 2 = 1 − a 2 b^2 + c^2 = 1 - a^2 b 2 + c 2 = 1 − a 2 . The x x x -component becomes:
− x ( 1 − a 2 ) + a ( b y + c z ) = − x + a 2 x + a b y + a c z = − x + a ( a x + b y + c z ) = − x + a ( n ⋅ r ) -x(1 - a^2) + a(by + cz) = -x + a^2 x + aby + acz = -x + a(ax + by + cz) = -x + a(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r}) − x ( 1 − a 2 ) + a ( b y + cz ) = − x + a 2 x + ab y + a cz = − x + a ( a x + b y + cz ) = − x + a ( n ⋅ r )
By identical reasoning (cyclic permutation of components), the y y y -component is − y + b ( n ⋅ r ) -y + b(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r}) − y + b ( n ⋅ r ) and the z z z -component is − z + c ( n ⋅ r ) -z + c(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r}) − z + c ( n ⋅ r ) . Therefore:
f(f ( r ) ) = − r + ( n ⋅ r ) n = ( n ⋅ r ) n − r (*) \text{f(f}(\mathbf{r})) = -\mathbf{r} + (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n} = (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n} - \mathbf{r} \qquad \text{(*)} f(f ( r )) = − r + ( n ⋅ r ) n = ( n ⋅ r ) n − r (*)
Diagram and geometric interpretation:
Any vector r can be decomposed into a component parallel to n and a component perpendicular to n :
r = ( n ⋅ r ) n ⏟ component parallel to n + ( r − ( n ⋅ r ) n ) ⏟ component perpendicular to n \mathbf{r} = \underbrace{(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n}}_{\text{component parallel to } \mathbf{n}} + \underbrace{(\mathbf{r} - (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n})}_{\text{component perpendicular to } \mathbf{n}} r = component parallel to n ( n ⋅ r ) n + component perpendicular to n ( r − ( n ⋅ r ) n )
From (*), f(f(r )) = (n . r )n - r = -(r - (n . r )n ). This means f(f(r )) is the vector obtained by negating the perpendicular component of r while leaving the parallel component unchanged. In other words, f(f(r )) is the reflection of r through the line spanned by n (equivalently, the reflection in the direction perpendicular to n ).
Diagrammatically, if we draw r , its component ( n ⋅ r ) n (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n} ( n ⋅ r ) n along n , and the perpendicular residual r − ( n ⋅ r ) n \mathbf{r} - (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{n} r − ( n ⋅ r ) n , then f(f(r )) has the same component along n but the perpendicular residual is flipped.
Part (ii)
We examine g in two special cases.
Case 1: s = n. Since n x n = 0 , we have f(n ) = 0 and f(f(n )) = (n . n )n - n = n - n = 0 . Therefore:
g ( n ) = n + 0 + 0 = n \text{g}(\mathbf{n}) = \mathbf{n} + \mathbf{0} + \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{n} g ( n ) = n + 0 + 0 = n
So points along the n -axis are unchanged by g.
Case 2: s = r where r is perpendicular to n (i.e., n . r = 0).
Since n . r = 0, we get f(f(r )) = -r from (*). Therefore:
g ( r ) = r + sin θ ( n × r ) + ( 1 − cos θ ) ( − r ) = r cos θ + sin θ ( n × r ) \text{g}(\mathbf{r}) = \mathbf{r} + \sin\theta \, (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{r}) + (1 - \cos\theta)(-\mathbf{r}) = \mathbf{r}\cos\theta + \sin\theta \, (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{r}) g ( r ) = r + sin θ ( n × r ) + ( 1 − cos θ ) ( − r ) = r cos θ + sin θ ( n × r )
Since |n | = 1 and r is perpendicular to n , we have |n x r | = |r |. The vectors r and n x r are both perpendicular to n and perpendicular to each other, with equal magnitudes. The expression r cos θ + ( n × r ) sin θ \mathbf{r}\cos\theta + (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{r})\sin\theta r cos θ + ( n × r ) sin θ is a rotation of r by angle θ \theta θ within the plane perpendicular to n , in the direction from r towards n x r (which is the right-hand rule / anticlockwise direction about n ).
Since any vector s can be decomposed as s = ( n ⋅ s ) n + ( s − ( n ⋅ s ) n ) \mathbf{s} = (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{s})\mathbf{n} + (\mathbf{s} - (\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{s})\mathbf{n}) s = ( n ⋅ s ) n + ( s − ( n ⋅ s ) n ) , and g fixes the parallel component (by Case 1) and rotates the perpendicular component by θ \theta θ (by Case 2), the transformation g is a rotation through angle θ \theta θ about the axis through the origin in the direction of n , in the anticlockwise sense (right-hand rule). This is precisely the Rodrigues rotation formula.
Part (iii)
We simplify h(s ):
h ( s ) = − s − 2 f(f ( s ) ) = − s − 2 ( ( n ⋅ s ) n − s ) = s − 2 ( n ⋅ s ) n \text{h}(\mathbf{s}) = -\mathbf{s} - 2\,\text{f(f}(\mathbf{s})) = -\mathbf{s} - 2((\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{s})\mathbf{n} - \mathbf{s}) = \mathbf{s} - 2(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{s})\mathbf{n} h ( s ) = − s − 2 f(f ( s )) = − s − 2 (( n ⋅ s ) n − s ) = s − 2 ( n ⋅ s ) n
We verify the key properties:
h(n ) = n - 2(n . n )n = n - 2n = -n . So the component along n is negated.
If r is perpendicular to n (i.e., n . r = 0), then h(r ) = r . So the perpendicular component is unchanged.
Therefore h reflects each vector through the plane through the origin that is perpendicular to n : the component along n is negated, while all components in the plane perpendicular to n are preserved. This is precisely the reflection in the plane through O O O perpendicular to n .
Examiner Notes
约三分之一考生尝试,略优于Q3和Q6。第(i)部分第一问通常正确,但许多考生忽略了n是单位向量的条件导致第二问推导困难。图形绘制是主要失分点——未能理解三个向量的大小关系和垂直关系。第(ii)(iii)部分少数考生能准确识别并论证变换,但多数虽有大致想法却无法精确定义和论证结论。
Topic : 纯数 | Difficulty : Challenging | Marks : 20
8 (i) Use De Moivre’s theorem to prove that for any positive integer k > 1 k > 1 k > 1 ,
sin ( k θ ) = sin θ cos k − 1 θ ( k − ( k 3 ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) + ( k 5 ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ) \sin(k\theta) = \sin \theta \cos^{k-1} \theta \left( k - \binom{k}{3}(\sec^2 \theta - 1) + \binom{k}{5}(\sec^2 \theta - 1)^2 - \cdots \right) sin ( k θ ) = sin θ cos k − 1 θ ( k − ( 3 k ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) + ( 5 k ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ )
and find a similar expression for cos ( k θ ) \cos(k\theta) cos ( k θ ) .
(ii) Let θ = cos − 1 ( 1 a ) \theta = \cos^{-1}(\frac{1}{a}) θ = cos − 1 ( a 1 ) , where θ \theta θ is measured in degrees, and a a a is an odd integer greater than 1.
Suppose that there is a positive integer k k k such that sin ( k θ ) = 0 \sin(k\theta) = 0 sin ( k θ ) = 0 and sin ( m θ ) ≠ 0 \sin(m\theta) \neq 0 sin ( m θ ) = 0 for all integers m m m with 0 < m < k 0 < m < k 0 < m < k .
Show that it would be necessary to have k k k even and cos ( 1 2 k θ ) = 0 \cos(\frac{1}{2}k\theta) = 0 cos ( 2 1 k θ ) = 0 .
Deduce that θ \theta θ is irrational.
(iii) Show that if ϕ = cot − 1 ( 1 b ) \phi = \cot^{-1}(\frac{1}{b}) ϕ = cot − 1 ( b 1 ) , where ϕ \phi ϕ is measured in degrees, and b b b is an even integer greater than 1, then ϕ \phi ϕ is irrational.
Hint
解题思路: 本题以 De Moivre 定理为核心工具,通过分析 sin(kθ) 展开式中各项的奇偶性来证明角度的无理性。核心技巧是:将 sec²θ - 1 替换为 tan²θ = (a²-1),利用 a 为奇数时 a²-1 为偶数这一数论性质,证明展开式中括号内的值恒为奇数(从而非零),导出矛盾。
Part (i):用 De Moivre 定理展开 sin(kθ) 和 cos(kθ)
由 De Moivre 定理:cos(kθ) + i sin(kθ) = (cos θ + i sin θ)^k
用二项式展开右边,分别取虚部和实部:
sin(kθ) 的展开:
sin(kθ) = C(k,1)cos^{k-1}θ sin θ - C(k,3)cos^{k-3}θ sin³θ + C(k,5)cos^{k-5}θ sin⁵θ - …
提取公因子 sin θ cos^{k-1}θ,并用 tan²θ = sec²θ - 1:
sin(kθ) = sin θ cos^{k-1}θ [k - C(k,3)(sec²θ - 1) + C(k,5)(sec²θ - 1)² - …]
cos(kθ) 的类似表达式:
cos(kθ) = cos^k θ [1 - C(k,2)(sec²θ - 1) + C(k,4)(sec²θ - 1)² - …]
Part (ii):证明 k 必须为偶数,并推导 θ 为无理数
设 θ = cos⁻¹(1/a),其中 a 为大于 1 的奇数。
第一步:证明 k 必须为偶数。
假设 k 为奇数。代入 sec θ = a,sin(kθ) = 0 意味着:
sin θ · (1/a^{k-1}) [k - C(k,3)(a²-1) + C(k,5)(a²-1)² - … + (-1)^{(k-1)/2}(a²-1)^{(k-1)/2}] = 0
由于 a 为奇数,a² - 1 为偶数。括号内各项中:
第一项 k 为奇数
其余各项都包含 (a²-1) 的幂次,因此都是偶数
所以括号内 = 奇数 + 偶数之和 = 奇数 ≠ 0。
又 sin θ ≠ 0,1/a^{k-1} ≠ 0。三个因子均非零,矛盾!故 k 必须为偶数。
第二步:证明 cos(kθ/2) = 0。
k 为偶数时,sin(kθ) = 2 sin(kθ/2) cos(kθ/2) = 0。由于 k/2 < k,由题设 sin(kθ/2) ≠ 0,故必有 cos(kθ/2) = 0。
第三步:导出矛盾,证明 θ 为无理数。
设 n = k/2。由 Part (i) 的 cos 展开:
cos(nθ) = (1/a^n)[1 - C(n,2)(a²-1) + C(n,4)(a²-1)² - …]
括号内第一项为 1(奇数),其余各项含 (a²-1) 的幂次(偶数),故括号内为奇数 ≠ 0。因此 cos(nθ) ≠ 0,与 cos(nθ) = 0 矛盾!
这说明不存在最小的正整数 k 使得 sin(kθ) = 0。若 θ 为有理数,则 θ = 180p/k,此时 sin(kθ) = sin(180p) = 0,矛盾。故 θ 为无理数。
Part (iii):证明 φ = cot⁻¹(1/b) 为无理数
设 b 为大于 1 的偶数,φ = cot⁻¹(1/b),即 tan φ = b。
假设存在最小的奇数 k 使得 sin(kφ) = 0。由 Part (i):
sin(kφ) = sin φ cos^{k-1}φ [k - C(k,3)b² + C(k,5)b⁴ - …] = 0
括号内第一项 k 为奇数,其余各项含 b²(偶数,因为 b 为偶数),故括号内为奇数 ≠ 0。又 sin φ ≠ 0,cos φ ≠ 0,矛盾。故 k 不能为奇数。
若 k 为偶数,同 Part (ii) 论证,cos(kφ/2) = 0。设 n = k/2:
cos(nφ) = cos^n φ [1 - C(n,2)b² + C(n,4)b⁴ - …]
括号内为奇数 ≠ 0,cos φ ≠ 0,故 cos(nφ) ≠ 0,矛盾。
因此不存在 k 使得 sin(kφ) = 0,故 φ 为无理数。
常见错误(来自 Examiner Report):
混淆度与弧度:题目明确说 θ 以度为单位,但有考生错误地引用 π 的无理性来论证。
Part (ii) 不完整:大多数考生能代入 sec θ = a 得到展开式,但难以完成”k 必须为偶数”的论证。
忽视结果的意义:部分考生能证明 cos(kθ/2) = 0,但未能认识到它与无理性论证的关系。
Part (i) 工作不足:少数考生未给出充分的推导过程。
Model Solution
Part (i)
By De Moivre’s theorem, cos ( k θ ) + i sin ( k θ ) = ( cos θ + i sin θ ) k \cos(k\theta) + i\sin(k\theta) = (\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)^k cos ( k θ ) + i sin ( k θ ) = ( cos θ + i sin θ ) k . We expand the right side using the binomial theorem:
( cos θ + i sin θ ) k = ∑ r = 0 k ( k r ) cos k − r θ ( i sin θ ) r (\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)^k = \sum_{r=0}^{k} \binom{k}{r} \cos^{k-r}\theta \, (i\sin\theta)^r ( cos θ + i sin θ ) k = ∑ r = 0 k ( r k ) cos k − r θ ( i sin θ ) r
Taking the imaginary part to obtain sin ( k θ ) \sin(k\theta) sin ( k θ ) , only odd powers of i sin θ i\sin\theta i sin θ contribute (since i 2 m + 1 i^{2m+1} i 2 m + 1 is purely imaginary):
sin ( k θ ) = ( k 1 ) cos k − 1 θ sin θ − ( k 3 ) cos k − 3 θ sin 3 θ + ( k 5 ) cos k − 5 θ sin 5 θ − ⋯ \sin(k\theta) = \binom{k}{1}\cos^{k-1}\theta\sin\theta - \binom{k}{3}\cos^{k-3}\theta\sin^3\theta + \binom{k}{5}\cos^{k-5}\theta\sin^5\theta - \cdots sin ( k θ ) = ( 1 k ) cos k − 1 θ sin θ − ( 3 k ) cos k − 3 θ sin 3 θ + ( 5 k ) cos k − 5 θ sin 5 θ − ⋯
We factor out sin θ cos k − 1 θ \sin\theta\cos^{k-1}\theta sin θ cos k − 1 θ from every term. The general term ( k 2 j + 1 ) cos k − ( 2 j + 1 ) θ sin 2 j + 1 θ \binom{k}{2j+1}\cos^{k-(2j+1)}\theta\sin^{2j+1}\theta ( 2 j + 1 k ) cos k − ( 2 j + 1 ) θ sin 2 j + 1 θ becomes ( k 2 j + 1 ) cos k − 1 θ sin θ ⋅ sin 2 j θ cos 2 j θ = ( k 2 j + 1 ) cos k − 1 θ sin θ ⋅ tan 2 j θ \binom{k}{2j+1}\cos^{k-1}\theta\sin\theta \cdot \frac{\sin^{2j}\theta}{\cos^{2j}\theta} = \binom{k}{2j+1}\cos^{k-1}\theta\sin\theta \cdot \tan^{2j}\theta ( 2 j + 1 k ) cos k − 1 θ sin θ ⋅ c o s 2 j θ s i n 2 j θ = ( 2 j + 1 k ) cos k − 1 θ sin θ ⋅ tan 2 j θ .
Since tan 2 θ = sec 2 θ − 1 \tan^2\theta = \sec^2\theta - 1 tan 2 θ = sec 2 θ − 1 , we obtain:
sin ( k θ ) = sin θ cos k − 1 θ ( k − ( k 3 ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) + ( k 5 ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ) (*) \sin(k\theta) = \sin\theta\cos^{k-1}\theta\left(k - \binom{k}{3}(\sec^2\theta - 1) + \binom{k}{5}(\sec^2\theta - 1)^2 - \cdots\right) \qquad \text{(*)} sin ( k θ ) = sin θ cos k − 1 θ ( k − ( 3 k ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) + ( 5 k ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ) (*)
where the signs alternate and the powers of ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) (\sec^2\theta - 1) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) increase by 1 at each step.
Taking the real part to obtain cos ( k θ ) \cos(k\theta) cos ( k θ ) , only even powers contribute:
cos ( k θ ) = ( k 0 ) cos k θ − ( k 2 ) cos k − 2 θ sin 2 θ + ( k 4 ) cos k − 4 θ sin 4 θ − ⋯ \cos(k\theta) = \binom{k}{0}\cos^k\theta - \binom{k}{2}\cos^{k-2}\theta\sin^2\theta + \binom{k}{4}\cos^{k-4}\theta\sin^4\theta - \cdots cos ( k θ ) = ( 0 k ) cos k θ − ( 2 k ) cos k − 2 θ sin 2 θ + ( 4 k ) cos k − 4 θ sin 4 θ − ⋯
Factoring out cos k θ \cos^k\theta cos k θ and using sin 2 j θ / cos 2 j θ = tan 2 j θ = ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) j \sin^{2j}\theta/\cos^{2j}\theta = \tan^{2j}\theta = (\sec^2\theta - 1)^j sin 2 j θ / cos 2 j θ = tan 2 j θ = ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) j :
cos ( k θ ) = cos k θ ( 1 − ( k 2 ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) + ( k 4 ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ) (**) \cos(k\theta) = \cos^k\theta\left(1 - \binom{k}{2}(\sec^2\theta - 1) + \binom{k}{4}(\sec^2\theta - 1)^2 - \cdots\right) \qquad \text{(**)} cos ( k θ ) = cos k θ ( 1 − ( 2 k ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) + ( 4 k ) ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ) (**)
Part (ii)
Let θ = cos − 1 ( 1 / a ) \theta = \cos^{-1}(1/a) θ = cos − 1 ( 1/ a ) where a a a is an odd integer greater than 1, so sec θ = a \sec\theta = a sec θ = a . Suppose k k k is the smallest positive integer with sin ( k θ ) = 0 \sin(k\theta) = 0 sin ( k θ ) = 0 .
Step 1: k k k must be even.
Suppose for contradiction that k k k is odd. Substituting sec θ = a \sec\theta = a sec θ = a into (*):
sin ( k θ ) = sin θ ⋅ 1 a k − 1 [ k − ( k 3 ) ( a 2 − 1 ) + ( k 5 ) ( a 2 − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) ( k − 1 ) / 2 ( k k ) ( a 2 − 1 ) ( k − 1 ) / 2 ] \sin(k\theta) = \sin\theta \cdot \frac{1}{a^{k-1}} \left[k - \binom{k}{3}(a^2 - 1) + \binom{k}{5}(a^2 - 1)^2 - \cdots + (-1)^{(k-1)/2}\binom{k}{k}(a^2 - 1)^{(k-1)/2}\right] sin ( k θ ) = sin θ ⋅ a k − 1 1 [ k − ( 3 k ) ( a 2 − 1 ) + ( 5 k ) ( a 2 − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ + ( − 1 ) ( k − 1 ) /2 ( k k ) ( a 2 − 1 ) ( k − 1 ) /2 ]
Since a a a is an odd integer, a 2 − 1 a^2 - 1 a 2 − 1 is even. In the bracket:
The first term k k k is odd (since k k k is odd).
Every other term contains a positive power of ( a 2 − 1 ) (a^2 - 1) ( a 2 − 1 ) , so each is even.
Therefore the bracket equals (odd) + (sum of evens) = odd, and in particular the bracket is non-zero.
Since θ = cos − 1 ( 1 / a ) \theta = \cos^{-1}(1/a) θ = cos − 1 ( 1/ a ) with a > 1 a > 1 a > 1 , we have sin θ ≠ 0 \sin\theta \neq 0 sin θ = 0 and 1 / a k − 1 ≠ 0 1/a^{k-1} \neq 0 1/ a k − 1 = 0 . The product of three non-zero factors is non-zero, contradicting sin ( k θ ) = 0 \sin(k\theta) = 0 sin ( k θ ) = 0 . Hence k k k must be even.
Step 2: cos ( 1 2 k θ ) = 0 \cos(\tfrac{1}{2}k\theta) = 0 cos ( 2 1 k θ ) = 0 .
Since k k k is even, write k = 2 n k = 2n k = 2 n where n n n is a positive integer. Then:
sin ( k θ ) = sin ( 2 n θ ) = 2 sin ( n θ ) cos ( n θ ) = 0 \sin(k\theta) = \sin(2n\theta) = 2\sin(n\theta)\cos(n\theta) = 0 sin ( k θ ) = sin ( 2 n θ ) = 2 sin ( n θ ) cos ( n θ ) = 0
Since n = k / 2 < k n = k/2 < k n = k /2 < k , by the minimality of k k k we have sin ( n θ ) ≠ 0 \sin(n\theta) \neq 0 sin ( n θ ) = 0 . Therefore cos ( n θ ) = 0 \cos(n\theta) = 0 cos ( n θ ) = 0 , i.e., cos ( 1 2 k θ ) = 0 \cos(\tfrac{1}{2}k\theta) = 0 cos ( 2 1 k θ ) = 0 .
Step 3: Deduce that θ \theta θ is irrational.
We apply (**) with n = k / 2 n = k/2 n = k /2 and sec θ = a \sec\theta = a sec θ = a :
cos ( n θ ) = 1 a n [ 1 − ( n 2 ) ( a 2 − 1 ) + ( n 4 ) ( a 2 − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ] \cos(n\theta) = \frac{1}{a^n}\left[1 - \binom{n}{2}(a^2 - 1) + \binom{n}{4}(a^2 - 1)^2 - \cdots\right] cos ( n θ ) = a n 1 [ 1 − ( 2 n ) ( a 2 − 1 ) + ( 4 n ) ( a 2 − 1 ) 2 − ⋯ ]
In the bracket, the first term is 1 (odd), and every other term contains a positive power of ( a 2 − 1 ) (a^2-1) ( a 2 − 1 ) (which is even), so each is even. The bracket is (odd) + (sum of evens) = odd, hence non-zero. Since 1 / a n ≠ 0 1/a^n \neq 0 1/ a n = 0 , we conclude cos ( n θ ) ≠ 0 \cos(n\theta) \neq 0 cos ( n θ ) = 0 , contradicting Step 2.
This contradiction shows that no such smallest positive integer k k k can exist. Now suppose θ \theta θ is rational, say θ = 180 p / q \theta = 180p/q θ = 180 p / q degrees where p , q p, q p , q are positive integers with gcd ( p , q ) = 1 \gcd(p, q) = 1 g cd( p , q ) = 1 . Then sin ( q θ ) = sin ( 180 p ) = 0 \sin(q\theta) = \sin(180p) = 0 sin ( q θ ) = sin ( 180 p ) = 0 , so there exists a positive integer k ≤ q k \leq q k ≤ q with sin ( k θ ) = 0 \sin(k\theta) = 0 sin ( k θ ) = 0 . By the argument above, no such k k k exists. This is a contradiction, so θ \theta θ must be irrational.
Part (iii)
Let ϕ = cot − 1 ( 1 / b ) \phi = \cot^{-1}(1/b) ϕ = cot − 1 ( 1/ b ) where b b b is an even integer greater than 1, so tan ϕ = b \tan\phi = b tan ϕ = b (equivalently sec 2 ϕ = 1 + b 2 \sec^2\phi = 1 + b^2 sec 2 ϕ = 1 + b 2 ). We show ϕ \phi ϕ is irrational by the same strategy.
Suppose for contradiction that there exists a smallest positive integer k k k with sin ( k ϕ ) = 0 \sin(k\phi) = 0 sin ( k ϕ ) = 0 . We use the expansion (*) with sec 2 ϕ − 1 = tan 2 ϕ = b 2 \sec^2\phi - 1 = \tan^2\phi = b^2 sec 2 ϕ − 1 = tan 2 ϕ = b 2 :
sin ( k ϕ ) = sin ϕ cos k − 1 ϕ ( k − ( k 3 ) b 2 + ( k 5 ) b 4 − ⋯ ) \sin(k\phi) = \sin\phi\cos^{k-1}\phi\left(k - \binom{k}{3}b^2 + \binom{k}{5}b^4 - \cdots\right) sin ( k ϕ ) = sin ϕ cos k − 1 ϕ ( k − ( 3 k ) b 2 + ( 5 k ) b 4 − ⋯ )
Since b b b is even, b 2 b^2 b 2 is even, and every positive power of b 2 b^2 b 2 is even.
Case 1: k k k is odd. The bracket is k − ( even ) + ( even ) − ⋯ = k + ( even sum ) k - (\text{even}) + (\text{even}) - \cdots = k + (\text{even sum}) k − ( even ) + ( even ) − ⋯ = k + ( even sum ) . Since k k k is odd, the bracket is odd, hence non-zero. Since ϕ = cot − 1 ( 1 / b ) \phi = \cot^{-1}(1/b) ϕ = cot − 1 ( 1/ b ) with b > 1 b > 1 b > 1 , we have sin ϕ ≠ 0 \sin\phi \neq 0 sin ϕ = 0 and cos ϕ ≠ 0 \cos\phi \neq 0 cos ϕ = 0 . Three non-zero factors give sin ( k ϕ ) ≠ 0 \sin(k\phi) \neq 0 sin ( k ϕ ) = 0 , a contradiction.
Case 2: k k k is even. Write k = 2 n k = 2n k = 2 n . As before, sin ( 2 n ϕ ) = 2 sin ( n ϕ ) cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 \sin(2n\phi) = 2\sin(n\phi)\cos(n\phi) = 0 sin ( 2 n ϕ ) = 2 sin ( n ϕ ) cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 with sin ( n ϕ ) ≠ 0 \sin(n\phi) \neq 0 sin ( n ϕ ) = 0 (by minimality of k k k ), so cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 \cos(n\phi) = 0 cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 .
Now apply (**) with sec 2 ϕ − 1 = b 2 \sec^2\phi - 1 = b^2 sec 2 ϕ − 1 = b 2 :
cos ( n ϕ ) = cos n ϕ ( 1 − ( n 2 ) b 2 + ( n 4 ) b 4 − ⋯ ) \cos(n\phi) = \cos^n\phi\left(1 - \binom{n}{2}b^2 + \binom{n}{4}b^4 - \cdots\right) cos ( n ϕ ) = cos n ϕ ( 1 − ( 2 n ) b 2 + ( 4 n ) b 4 − ⋯ )
The bracket is 1 + ( sum of evens ) = odd ≠ 0 1 + (\text{sum of evens}) = \text{odd} \neq 0 1 + ( sum of evens ) = odd = 0 , and cos ϕ ≠ 0 \cos\phi \neq 0 cos ϕ = 0 , so cos ( n ϕ ) ≠ 0 \cos(n\phi) \neq 0 cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 . This contradicts cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 \cos(n\phi) = 0 cos ( n ϕ ) = 0 .
In both cases we reach a contradiction, so no such k k k exists. If ϕ \phi ϕ were rational, say ϕ = 180 p / q \phi = 180p/q ϕ = 180 p / q degrees, then sin ( q ϕ ) = 0 \sin(q\phi) = 0 sin ( q ϕ ) = 0 , giving such a k k k . This is impossible, so ϕ \phi ϕ is irrational.
Examiner Notes
最不受欢迎的纯数题(略少于Q7),平均分6/20。第(i)部分通常正确但推导过程常不充分。第(ii)部分超过半数考生止步于此,主要困难在于证明k必须为偶数。严重错误警示:部分考生引用π的无理性来证明(题目明确θ以度为单位,π的无理性与此无关)。能完成(ii)的考生通常也能完成(iii)。