1 In this question, you are not required to justify the accuracy of the approximations.
(i) Write down the binomial expansion of (1+100k)21 in ascending powers of k, up to and including the k3 term.
(a) Use the value k=8 to find an approximation to five decimal places for 3.
(b) By choosing a suitable integer value of k, find an approximation to five decimal places for 6.
(ii) By considering the first two terms of the binomial expansion of (1+1000k)31, show that 21003029 is an approximation to 33.
Hint
It is important to get off to a good start in any examination, especially so in STEPs, and Q1 is specifically designed to get as many candidates as possible off to such a start. Binomial series expansions are given in any of the permitted formulae books, and there is really no excuse for failing to pick up the marks on the introductory bit of the question. It is almost certainly to your advantage to simplify the terms of the expansion, but a little bit of care is in order here, else you are automatically losing accuracy marks later on in (a) and (b).
For part (a), you are told exactly what value of k to choose, and it is simply a case of using it on both sides of the statement — in the LHS to show that you can extract a sensible multiple of 3, and then in the RHS to see what you get as a decimal. Remember that working in powers of 10 makes the numerical working a lot simpler.
In (b), you have to choose a suitable value of k so that the LHS gives a multiple of 6. There is a small (but negative) integer value of k which will do this nicely. Many candidates, however, actually chose to work with k=50 and, if you check, you will see that this seems to work equally well. However, the approximation gained is not nearly so accurate; this is because … ? Also, not a few candidates chose values of k greater than 100 in absolute value, and these are even worse, because …?
In (ii), it is certainly possible to work back from the final answer in order to figure out what value of k to use here, but (again) you are looking for some (presumably) integer value that will this time yield a perfect cube multiple of 3 when 1+1000k is written as an improper fraction.
For interest’s sake, the original version of the question used the first three terms of the series expansion with k=24 to find an approximation to 32.
Therefore 6≈25×0.979796=2.44949 (to five decimal places).
Part (ii):
We use the expansion (1+x)1/3=1+31x+⋯
With x=1000k:
(1+1000k)1/3≈1+3000k
We need 1+1000k to produce a multiple of 33. Choose k=17:
1+100017=10001017=10001017
Note that 1017=27×3732… let us try differently. We need (10001000+k)1/3 to be a rational multiple of 33. If 1000+k=3n3 for some integer n, with n=7: 3×343=1029, so k=29.
Most candidates attempted this question and the majority coped fairly well with the algebraic demands. Surprisingly, it was when the work went numerical that candidates tended to let themselves down; poor arithmetic providing the main difficulty. The final three marks available in (i) parts (a) and (b) were the marks most frequently scorned, generally being lost by candidates’ unwillingness or inability to simplify fractions and/or turn them into decimals. In many cases, candidates had difficulty deciding on a suitable value for k in (i) (b) and (ii). In (b), the value k=50 was often selected, rather than the intended value of −4. Although this does lead to a similar set of working, the ultimate approximation is relatively poor, and they lost the final mark here. It is, rather more tellingly, indicative of the way in which many modern A-level mathematicians have great difficulty in thinking only in terms of positive integers! A small, but significant, number of candidates offered a value of k that exceeded 100 (the denominator of the "x" term), and these were penalised all four of the available marks for this part of the question, on the not unreasonable grounds that they really should have appreciated the general convergence condition ∣100k∣<1 for binomial series of this kind.
2 A curve has equation y=2x3−bx2+cx. It has a maximum point at (p,m) and a minimum point at (q,n) where p>0 and n>0. Let R be the region enclosed by the curve, the line x=p and the line y=n.
(i) Express b and c in terms of p and q.
(ii) Sketch the curve. Mark on your sketch the point of inflection and shade the region R. Describe the symmetry of the curve.
(iii) Show that m−n=(q−p)3.
(iv) Show that the area of R is 21(q−p)4.
Hint
It is fairly obvious that x=p and x=q are the two roots of the equation dxdy=0, which means that the derivative is a multiple of (x−p)(x−q). Comparing the two then immediately gives b and c in terms of p and q. The sketch is a standard (positive) cubic, through the origin, with its two TPs in the first quadrant. Unintentionally, there are two possible candidates for the region R, since the setters omitted to consider the one of them. Almost all candidates taking this paper identified the intended region, and this was because the question tries to get you to focus on the area around the point of inflection, which you are asked to mark on the diagram.
In (ii), m and n are simply the y-coordinates of the points corresponding to x=p and q (respectively), and by this point you should know the curve’s equation (in terms of p and q rather than b and c). Notice that y(m) involves the extra qs and y(n) involves extra ps, so the difference may just involve lots of (q−p)s, and the answer effectively tells you this much also. It may help in the working, both now and later, if you exploit this difference as much as possible.
Before embarking on the final part of the question, it would benefit you greatly to take a momentary pause and think about how the various bits of the question hang together. You were earlier asked to describe the symmetry of the cubic, and this was not just an idle bit of space-filler on the setter’s part. Rather, it was an attempt to force you into recognising that the area of the region R can be found by means other than integration. Ignoring the coordinate axes on the diagram, and looking at the lines x=p, x=q, y=n and y=m, you will see a nice rectangle appearing in the middle of the page. Because of the symmetry of the cubic, R is something to do with this rectangle, and this fact pretty much allows you to write the answer straight down, using the answer to (iii). On the other hand, if you want to do it by integration (as most candidates did)
And if you feel up to an algebraic challenge, see if you can work out, by integration, the area of the other possible region R — which also turns out — rather surprisingly, I felt — to be a rational multiple of (q−p)4.
Answers: (i) b=3(p+q), c=6pq; (ii) (two-fold) rotational symmetry about the P of I.
Model Solution
Part (i)
Since y=2x3−bx2+cx, we have y′=6x2−2bx+c.
The turning points are at x=p and x=q, so y′=6(x−p)(x−q)=6x2−6(p+q)x+6pq.
Comparing with y′=6x2−2bx+c:
2b=6(p+q)⟹b=3(p+q),c=6pq
Part (ii)
The curve is y=2x3−3(p+q)x2+6pqx, which passes through the origin. The point of inflection is where y′′=0:
y′′=12x−6(p+q)=0⟹x=2p+q
The inflection point is at the midpoint of p and q. The curve has rotational symmetry of order 2 (two-fold symmetry) about the inflection point (2p+q,y(2p+q)).
The sketch shows a positive cubic passing through the origin, with a maximum at (p,m) and a minimum at (q,n) where 0<p<q. The region R is enclosed by the curve (between x=p and x=q), the vertical line x=p, and the horizontal line y=n.
Part (iii)
Substituting x=p and x=q into y=2x3−3(p+q)x2+6pqx:
The rectangle with vertices at (p,m), (q,m), (q,n), (p,n) has width q−p and height m−n=(q−p)3, so its area is (q−p)4.
By the rotational symmetry of the cubic about its inflection point (which lies at the centre of this rectangle), the curve divides the rectangle into two regions of equal area. The region R is one of these two halves, so:
Area of R=21(q−p)4
Method by integration:
Area of R=∫pq[y(x)−n]dx
Since n=−q3+3pq2 and y(x)=2x3−3(p+q)x2+6pqx:
y(x)−n=2x3−3(p+q)x2+6pqx+q3−3pq2
We observe that y(q)=n, so x=q is a root of y(x)−n=0. Also y(p)=m=n in general. Factoring out (x−q):
y(x)−n=(x−q)[2x2−(p+2q)x+(q2−pq)]
Wait, let us verify: expanding (x−q)[2x2+ax+b] and matching coefficients. The coefficient of x3 is 2, the constant term is −bq=q3−3pq2, so b=3pq−q2. The coefficient of x2 is a−2q=−3(p+q), so a=−(p+q). The coefficient of x is b−aq=3pq−q2+q(p+q)=3pq−q2+pq+q2=4pq. But we need 6pq. Let me redo.
Polynomial long division of 2x3−3(p+q)x2+6pqx+q3−3pq2 by (x−q):
y(x)−n=(x−q)(2x2−(p+2q)x+(q2−pq))
Wait, let me just verify the quadratic: (x−q)(2x2+αx+β). Expanding: 2x3+αx2+βx−2qx2−qαx−qβ.
Matching x2: α−2q=−3(p+q), so α=−3p−3q+2q=−(3p+q).
Matching x: β−qα=6pq, so β=6pq+qα=6pq−q(3p+q)=6pq−3pq−q2=3pq−q2.
Matching constant: −qβ=q3−3pq2, so β=3pq−q2. Consistent.
So y(x)−n=(x−q)[2x2−(3p+q)x+(3pq−q2)].
Factor the quadratic: discriminant =(3p+q)2−8(3pq−q2)=9p2+6pq+q2−24pq+8q2=9p2−18pq+9q2=9(p−q)2.
Roots: x=4(3p+q)±3(q−p). Since q>p, ∣q−p∣=q−p.
x=43p+q+3q−3p=qorx=43p+q−3q+3p=23p−q
So y(x)−n=2(x−q)2(x−23p−q).
Since p>0 and the maximum is at x=p with p<q, we have 23p−q<p (as 3p−q<2p⟺p<q). For x∈[p,q], the factor x−23p−q>0 and (x−q)2≥0, so y(x)−n≥0 as expected.
Area=∫pq2(x−q)2(x−23p−q)dx
Substituting u=x−q (so x=u+q, dx=du, limits from p−q to 0):
This question was also a very popular one, although many candidates gave up their attempt when the algebra started to get a little too tough for them, which generally happened later if not sooner. With this in mind, it has to be said that when candidates did get stuck at some stage of this question, the principal cause was (again!) an unwillingness or inability to simplify algebraic expressions before attempting to work with them. This was particularly important when factorising otherwise lengthy expressions with lots of (q−p)s involved in them.
The sketch required in (ii) was intended to be a gentle prod in the right direction for later use in the question, and should have been four easy marks for the taking. Strangely, however, it was often not very well attempted at all. A surprising number of candidates couldn’t even manage to draw their cubic through O; and many others seemed unable to make good use of the given conditions, which — despite looking complicated — actually just ensured that all the fun was going on in the first quadrant in an attempt to make life easy. Even more surprising still was the number of sketches that had non-cubic-like kinks, bumps and extra inflection points in them. I was particularly baffled by this widespread lack of grasp as to what a cubic should actually look like! I was equally baffled by the extraordinarily large body of candidates who failed to do what the question explicitly told them they were required to do, by not marking the point of inflection on their sketch and, in many cases, not even attempting to describe the symmetry of it either.
An apology has to be made at this point, since the region R in the question was insufficiently clearly defined and there were, in fact, two possibilities. Candidates were not penalised for choosing the “wrong” one at any stage of the proceedings, although the choice of the “left-hand” R would have prevented such candidates from using the short-cut for the following attempt at the area. ALL scripts where candidates made the “wrong” choice were passed to the Principal Examiner and given careful individual consideration. Only about 25 candidates made such a choice: of these, over half had failed to make any attempt at all at the area, and most of the rest had started work on the area and, to all intents and purposes, given up immediately. Two more had found the intended area anyway, despite their previous working (and were not penalised for having switched regions), and (I think) only three had pursued the “left-hand” area almost to a conclusion. Of course, they were unable to get the given answer, but they did get 7 of the 8 marks available. In each of these cases, it was fortunate (for us and them) that this was their last question, so it was safe to say that they hadn’t been unduly penalised for time in any way. It is, of course, impossible to say whether they might have seen the intended short-cut approach. In this respect, however, it has to be said that remarkably few candidates saw the symmetry approach anyhow. Partly, I suspect, due to not having picked up the hint at the diagram stage (see earlier)! On the plus side, for us, I imagine that the reference to the point of inflection on the diagram had at least ensured that most candidates chose the intended region R. Only 2 of the 25 or so candidates scored an overall mark that fell just below a grade boundary, and both of these were given the benefit of the doubt by the Chief Examiner.
3 By writing x=atanθ, show that, for a=0, ∫a2+x21dx=a1arctanax+constant.
(i) Let I=∫02π1+sin2xcosxdx.
(a) Evaluate I.
(b) Use the substitution t=tan21x to show that ∫011+6t2+t41−t2dt=21I.
(ii) Evaluate ∫011+14t2+t41−t2dt.
Hint
The first part of this question is a standard piece of bookwork, and requires only a modest ability to cope with substitution integration and a bit of trig. identity work. In (i) (a), you need to spot a suitable substitution for yourself — comparing the integrand with that in the introductory bit gives the game away, if you’re stuck. In my day, the t=tan21x substitution was a very common bit of work, but you don’t see it very often at A-level nowadays, so you could be forgiven for not being entirely familiar with it. Nonetheless, the principles of substitution still apply, and there may be the odd trig. identity to be employed, of course. The final two pieces of work here are greatly eased by the fact that they can be done in either direction. By that, I mean that one can eliminate all the ts in favour of xs, or vice versa. If you successfully complete part (i) (b), then (ii) is so much easier, since the only difference is that you must have 3sin2x in the denominator to give 14t2 instead of 6t2. Another simple substitution then changes the form into a standard arctan integral and, with a little bit of care, the whole thing can be wrapped up quite smoothly.
Overall, I would suggest that this is a fairly routine question, with no great leaps of thought required for a good A-level candidate to be able to work their way through it. What is required, however, is a high level of thoroughness and familiarity with the basic techniques of the trig. and calculus involved therein. Such capabilities are an essential requirement if you are preparing for future STEPs.
By the same Weierstrass argument as in part (i)(b) (with k=3 instead of k=1):
∫011+14t2+t41−t2dt=21J=63π
Examiner Notes
This was another popular question, and was usually a good source of marks for those candidates who attempted it. The first two parts were usually successfully completed. In part (i) (b), candidates had to employ the t=tan21x substitution which seems to have fallen into disuse in recent years (due to modularity!). Having said that, most candidates were able to make some progress and, where they did fall down, it was generally due to a lack of confidence in handling trigonometric identities. One of the advantages of these last two parts to the question was that they could be done in one of two directions, and many candidates were able to spot the connections and exploit them satisfactorily. When errors arose, they were frequently due to a lack of care with constants, and a correct final answer was not often to be found as a result.
4 Given that cosA, cosB and β are non-zero, show that the equation
αsin(A−B)+βcos(A+B)=γsin(A+B)
reduces to the form
(tanA−m)(tanB−n)=0,
where m and n are independent of A and B, if and only if α2=β2+γ2.
Determine all values of x, in the range 0≤x<2π, for which:
(i) 2sin(x−41π)+3cos(x+41π)=sin(x+41π);
(ii) 2sin(x−61π)+3cos(x+61π)=sin(x+61π);
(iii) 2sin(x+31π)+3cos(3x)=sin(3x).
Hint
This was actually not a particularly popular, or well done, question, although I still maintain that it is quite an easy one when it comes down to it! To begin with, it is really, really obvious that you need to expand the given trig. expressions using the Addition Formulae. Then, in order to obtain tans throughout, rather than sines and cosines, you are going to have to divide by … (hint: note the introductory conditions at the very start of the question, which are given to enable you not to worry about dividing by …). Wangling it into the given form and checking that the given condition holds is not much more than an algebraic exercise at this stage, and shouldn’t prove too much of a burden. However, it is easy to overlook the fact that you are asked to prove an “if and only if” statement, which is two-directional. In point of fact, it is the case here that a clear line of reasoning from first equation to final one actually is entirely reversible, although it is best to (at least) point out that this is so, rather than ignore it.
For the next three parts, see how this result can now be used to solve each of the given equations, once the “A” and the “B” have been clearly identified. Also, don’t forget to identify the α, β and γ (the same in each of the three parts) and verify that α2=β2+γ2. It is, of course, perfectly possible to start each bit from scratch, and the wording of the question doesn’t actually prevent you from doing so, but it would seem a bit of a waste of time and effort to do so. Having said that, several candidates successfully did (iii) by collecting the two (3x) terms up together and collecting them up in an Rsin(3x+θ) form.
Incidentally, my favourite part of the question was (ii), in which I got to play a bit of a dirty trick — the statement looks like an equation, but is actually an … because …
Answers: (i) 32π,35π; (ii) all x∈[0,2π); (iii) 4π,43π,45π,47π and 3π,34π.
Dividing both sides by cosAcosB (valid since cosA,cosB=0):
α(tanA−tanB)+β(1−tanAtanB)=γ(tanA+tanB)
Expanding:
αtanA−αtanB+β−βtanAtanB=γtanA+γtanB
Collecting all terms on the left:
−βtanAtanB+(α−γ)tanA+(−α−γ)tanB+β=0
Multiplying through by −1/β (valid since β=0):
tanAtanB−βα−γtanA+βα+γtanB−1=0(...)
For this to factorise as (tanA−m)(tanB−n)=0, we need:
(tanA−m)(tanB−n)=tanAtanB−mtanB−ntanA+mn
Comparing coefficients with (⋯):
Coefficient of tanA: −n=−βα−γ, so n=βα−γ
Coefficient of tanB: −m=βα+γ, so m=−βα+γ
Constant term: mn=−1
Checking the constant term condition:
mn=−βα+γ⋅βα−γ=−β2α2−γ2
For mn=−1, we need α2−γ2=β2, i.e.\ α2=β2+γ2.
Since each step is reversible (dividing by cosAcosB and by β are both reversible, and factoring the quadratic is an equivalence), this is an if-and-only-if proof.
Part (i):
The equation is 2sin(x−4π)+3cos(x+4π)=sin(x+4π).
Comparing with αsin(A−B)+βcos(A+B)=γsin(A+B), we identify A=x, B=π/4, α=2, β=3, γ=1.
Check: α2=4=3+1=β2+γ2. So the result applies.
m=−βα+γ=−33=−3,n=βα−γ=31=33
The equation becomes (tanx−(−3))(tan(π/4)−3/3)=0.
Since tan(π/4)=1=3/3, the second factor is never zero. So we need:
tanx=−3
In [0,2π): x=π−π/3=32π or x=2π−π/3=35π.
Part (ii):
The equation is 2sin(x−6π)+3cos(x+6π)=sin(x+6π).
Again α=2, β=3, γ=1, and the condition α2=β2+γ2 holds. This time A=x, B=π/6.
The values of m and n are the same: m=−3, n=3/3.
The equation becomes (tanx+3)(tan(π/6)−3/3)=0.
Since tan(π/6)=1/3=3/3, the second factor is identically zero for all x. This means the equation is satisfied for every x in [0,2π).
Part (iii):
The equation is 2sin(x+3π)+3cos(3x)=sin(3x).
We rewrite sin(x+π/3) by noting x+π/3=−(3x−(x+π/3))+… — instead, let us directly identify A and B.
Rewrite as: 2sin(x+π/3)+3cos(3x)=sin(3x).
Comparing with αsin(A−B)+βcos(A+B)=γsin(A+B): we need A−B=x+π/3 and A+B=3x. Solving: A=2x+π/6, B=x−π/6. But let’s try a cleaner identification.
Set A=x, B=−π/3. Then A−B=x+π/3 and A+B=x−π/3. This gives sin(A+B)=sin(x−π/3), not sin(3x).
A better approach: note that 2sin(x+π/3)=2sin(−((π−3x)−(x+π/3))+…) — this is getting complicated. Let us instead collect the 3x terms directly.
Write the equation as 2sin(x+3π)=sin(3x)−3cos(3x).
The right side: sin(3x)−3cos(3x)=2(21sin3x−23cos3x)=2sin(3x−3π).
So the equation becomes sin(x+3π)=sin(3x−3π).
Using sinP=sinQ⟹P=Q+2kπ or P=π−Q+2kπ:
Case 1:x+3π=3x−3π+2kπ
32π=2x+2kπ⟹x=3π−kπ
In [0,2π): x=3π (at k=0) or x=34π (at k=−1).
Case 2:x+3π=π−(3x−3π)+2kπ
x+3π=π−3x+3π+2kπ4x=π+2kπ⟹x=4π+2kπ
In [0,2π): x=4π,43π,45π,47π.
All six solutions: x=4π,3π,43π,45π,34π,47π.
Examiner Notes
This question was a popular one for partial attempts; with most candidates giving up towards the end of the introductory part and going elsewhere. It was slightly surprising to see candidates being put off in this way, since the given result made it perfectly possible to move successfully into the three following cases. For those who did press on, many lost a mark for not verifying (somewhere) that the chosen values of α, β and γ actually satisfied the required condition. Then, in (ii), one of the two brackets was identically zero, the significance of which was largely overlooked, with many candidates offering again the same two solutions as had been found in part (i). In (iii), it was important to note first A and B in terms of x, although some candidates adopted a valid alternative approach by first collecting up the two 3x terms.
5 In this question, f2(x) denotes f(f(x)), f3(x) denotes f(f(f(x))), and so on.
(i) The function f is defined, for x=±1/3, by
f(x)=1−3xx+3.
Find by direct calculation f2(x) and f3(x), and determine f2007(x).
(ii) Show that fn(x)=tan(θ+31nπ), where x=tanθ and n is any positive integer.
(iii) The function g(t) is defined, for ∣t∣≤1 by g(t)=23t+211−t2. Find an expression for gn(t) for any positive integer n.
Hint
Part (i) is a standard opener using compositions of functions, and the algebra shouldn’t prove too demanding if you’re careful. Again, simplified answers at each stage are most helpful for successful further progress through a question like this. The sequence of powers of f turns out to be periodic with period 3, and so f2007 isn’t quite the big ask that it might seem to be at first sight.
As you’re told what to do in (ii), it is just a case of being careful in establishing the relationship. A grasp of the process of mathematical induction is an essential requirement for STEP II, even if it is no longer on single Maths syllabuses elsewhere, and this could be used in this case. An informal inductive proof was perfectly acceptable also, although it was equally acceptable to establish the cases for n=1,2 and 3 and then point out that the periodicity of the tan function guarantees the rest.
Now, part (iii) offers something a little more demanding. The simple approach involves spotting that the use of t=sinθ gives 1−t2=cosθ, and then a similar inductive argument to (ii)‘s will lead to an admittedly unappealing but otherwise simple result for gn in a sin(A+B) kind of way. However, if instead you note that 1−t2 denotes the positive square-root of 1−t2, which may actually be −cosθ for some values of θ (and hence t). Thus, in fact, g2 can turn out to be just x again, so that the sequence {g,g2,g3,…} turns out to be oscillating (i.e. periodic with period 2). If you proceed further down this route, exploring which parts of g‘s domain give what “powers” of g, you get very interesting results which may be worth discussion, but were not expected under examination conditions here.
By the same inductive argument as in part (ii) (with π/6 in place of π/3):
gn(t)=sin(θ+6nπ)=sin(sin−1t+6nπ)
for any positive integer n.
Note: This formula is valid while the intermediate iterates stay within [−1,1], which is guaranteed for θ∈[−2π,3π] (i.e.\ t∈[−1,23]). For t∈(23,1], the angle θ+6π exceeds 2π, and the sign of cos changes at subsequent iterates, causing gn to become periodic with period 2: gn(t)=g(t) for odd n and gn(t)=t for even n.
Examiner Notes
Although this was not a popular choice of question, those who attempted it generally did rather well on it. Finding f2 and f3 was a routine algebraic slog, and most attempts coped successfully with it. Spotting, and then exploiting, the periodicity of the function was then a relatively easy matter. Pretty much everyone used x=tanθ appropriately in (ii), with formal and informal induction approaches evenly mixed. Some shrewder candidates identified the two forms for the cases n=1,2, and 3 and then noted that the periodicity of the tan function accounted for everything thereafter.
The final part of the question had intended to be a simple take on part (ii), but with t=sinθ this time, so that 1−t2=cosθ, and attempts at this part of the question generally fell evenly into one of the two following camps: those who gave up, and those who proceeded as intended. In all, I think there were just three candidates who noticed the extra complication that can arise in this case, with just two or three more following a separate line of enquiry without realising the inherent dichotomy in the “powers” of the function g. A full inspection of the function exposes the fact that gn takes different forms depending upon which part of the domain of g is employed. This is because the 1−t2 bit should actually be ∣cosθ∣, and this leads to different answers for g2 in the range 21≤t≤1 than in the rest of g‘s domain, so that candidates could get different answers from slightly different approaches.
With so few candidates expected to attempt this last part of the question, and with the alternate route leading to a much easier answer (where the sequence gn turns out to be periodic with period 2), it was considered to be a suitable final part to the question. Candidates were not expected to take more than one route, nor to comment on the potential for different answers. In the event, none did the former, although a few gave a mention of the latter property.
6 (i) Differentiate ln(x+3+x2) and x3+x2 and simplify your answers. Hence find ∫3+x2dx.
(ii) Find the two solutions of the differential equation
3(dxdy)2+2xdxdy=1
that satisfy y=0 when x=1.
Hint
Once again, this starts off with a bit of very basic work that a realistic STEP candidate needs to be in a position to rattle off quickly and efficiently. The “Hence” at the start of line 2 of the question tells you that the answer to this integral is to be found in the two previous answers, without further calculus work being done. It is, therefore, very bad examination practice to ignore the “Hence” demand and go off on an “or otherwise” route that isn’t actually needed. And there’s a strong chance you may not get any marks at all for your alternative approach.
In (ii), there is no reason why you can’t treat the given differential equation as a quadratic in dxdy and solve it to get two slightly different, and much simpler, differential equations than the original one. At this stage, if you have your wits about you, and you are NOT getting a 3+x2 anywhere in sight, then you really ought to be a bit suspicious about why not! For the rest of it, it
is a simple case of integrating using (i)‘s result, and then applying the given initial condition to find the constants of integration in each of the two cases.
From the second derivative, write 2x2+3=2(x2+3)−3:
3+x22x2+3=23+x2−3+x23
Therefore:
dxd[x3+x2]=23+x2−3+x23
Rearranging:
3+x2=21dxd[x3+x2]+233+x21
Using the first derivative result:
3+x2=21dxd[x3+x2]+23dxdln(x+3+x2)
Integrating both sides:
∫3+x2dx=21x3+x2+23ln(x+3+x2)+C
Part (ii)
Treat the equation 3(dxdy)2+2xdxdy=1 as a quadratic in dxdy:
3(dxdy)2+2x(dxdy)−1=0
By the quadratic formula with a=3, b=2x, c=−1:
dxdy=6−2x±4x2+12=6−2x±2x2+3=3−x±x2+3
This gives two differential equations.
Case 1:dxdy=3−x+x2+3
y=∫3−x+x2+3dx=−31∫xdx+31∫x2+3dx
=−6x2+61xx2+3+21ln(x+x2+3)+C1
Applying y=0 when x=1 (note 1+3=2):
0=−61+62+21ln3+C1=61+21ln3+C1
C1=−61−21ln3
y=61x3+x2+21ln(x+3+x2)−61x2−61−21ln3
Case 2:dxdy=3−x−x2+3
y=−6x2−61xx2+3−21ln(x+x2+3)+C2
Applying y=0 when x=1:
0=−61−62−21ln3+C2=−21−21ln3+C2
C2=21+21ln3
y=−61x3+x2−21ln(x+3+x2)−61x2+21+21ln3
Note: The second solution can equivalently be written as y=−61x3+x2−21ln(x+3+x2)−61x2+31+21ln23, which some sources give with a +ln2 term in place of −ln2; this appears to be a typographical error in the published answers.
Examiner Notes
This was one of the most popular questions on the paper, although the number of completely successful attempts could be counted without having to resort to toes! Part (i) was reasonably routine, although attempts at simplification were often not very well done, and left many candidates having to resort to “otherwise” approaches for integrating 3+x2, which was a great shame as they got no marks for ignoring the “hence” instruction in the question. Treating the differential equation in part (ii) as a quadratic in dy/dx proved an obstacle for many, but a lot of candidates seemed quite happy to work with it as such and made good progress in the rest of the question. The biggest hurdle to completely successful progress, however, once again lay in candidates’ inability to simplify expressions at various stages, and sign and/or constant errors proliferated.
7 A function f(x) is said to be concave on some interval if f′′(x)<0 in that interval. Show that sinx is concave for 0<x<π and that lnx is concave for x>0.
Let f(x) be concave on a given interval and let x1,x2,…,xn lie in the interval. Jensen’s inequality states that
n1∑k=1nf(xk)⩽f(n1∑k=1nxk)
and that equality holds if and only if x1=x2=⋯=xn. You may use this result without proving it.
(i) Given that A,B and C are angles of a triangle, show that
sinA+sinB+sinC⩽233.
(ii) By choosing a suitable function f, prove that
nt1t2…tn⩽nt1+t2+⋯+tn
for any positive integer n and for any positive numbers t1,t2,…,tn.
Hence:
(a) show that x4+y4+z4+16⩾8xyz, where x,y and z are any positive numbers;
(b) find the minimum value of x5+y5+z5−5xyz, where x,y and z are any positive numbers.
Hint
I like this question, although I accept that lots of candidates were probably put off by a question that looks like something they’ve never seen before. However, it is often the case that questions of the “new and weird-looking kind” can actually turn out to be relatively easy IF you’re prepared to be a bit adventurous.
The opening bit introduces you to a (possibly) new idea, and then gets you to practise this idea in a couple of cases in order that you get the hang of it. Then, in part (i), you actually get to use one of these ideas, and you’re pretty much told exactly what to do, and which of the two initial functions to use to get the given result.
Next, in (ii), you’re thrown in the deep-end rather more and left to decide what to do for yourself. Here, however, there is reference made to a mysterious “suitable function” to be used. Now, if you believe that the setter is out to trap you, trick you, and grind you into the ground then you probably think you’re all on your own at this stage and have to find your own function. But you’re wrong! The setters are actually trying to give you every opportunity to do some good mathematics, and every effort is made to point you in the right direction if is felt at all suitable to do so. In this case, you were initially asked to show that the sin and ln functions had the property being referred to. Then you used the sin function in (i). Perhaps, just perhaps, you are meant to be using the other one in (ii). If you can use the ln function to establish this next result (called the Arithmetic Mean - Geometric Mean Inequality), then parts (a) and (b) at the end simply use it twice; once with very little thought required, and one with a little more thought needed. Be brave! Give it a go.
Answers: (ii)−2.
Model Solution
Concavity of sinx and lnx
Let f(x)=sinx. Then f′(x)=cosx and f′′(x)=−sinx.
For 0<x<π, we have sinx>0, so f′′(x)=−sinx<0. Hence sinx is concave on (0,π).
Let g(x)=lnx. Then g′(x)=1/x and g′′(x)=−1/x2.
For x>0, we have 1/x2>0, so g′′(x)=−1/x2<0. Hence lnx is concave for x>0.
Part (i)
Since A, B, C are angles of a triangle, A+B+C=π with each angle in (0,π).
Applying Jensen’s inequality to the concave function sinx on (0,π):
3sinA+sinB+sinC⩽sin(3A+B+C)=sin3π=23
Multiplying both sides by 3:
sinA+sinB+sinC⩽233
with equality if and only if A=B=C=π/3 (equilateral triangle).
Part (ii)
Choose f(x)=lnx, which is concave for x>0. For positive numbers t1,t2,…,tn, Jensen’s inequality gives:
nlnt1+lnt2+⋯+lntn⩽ln(nt1+t2+⋯+tn)
The left side equals n1ln(t1t2⋯tn)=ln((t1t2⋯tn)1/n).
Since ln is strictly increasing, exponentiating both sides preserves the inequality:
(t1t2⋯tn)1/n⩽nt1+t2+⋯+tn
with equality if and only if t1=t2=⋯=tn. This is the AM-GM inequality.
Part (a)
Apply AM-GM to the four positive numbers x4, y4, z4, 16:
4x4+y4+z4+16⩾(x4⋅y4⋅z4⋅16)1/4
The right side equals (16x4y4z4)1/4=161/4⋅xyz=2xyz.
Therefore:
4x4+y4+z4+16⩾2xyz⟹x4+y4+z4+16⩾8xyz
with equality when x4=y4=z4=16, i.e.\ x=y=z=2.
Part (b)
Apply AM-GM to the five positive numbers x5, y5, z5, 1, 1:
5x5+y5+z5+1+1⩾(x5⋅y5⋅z5⋅1⋅1)1/5=xyz
Therefore:
x5+y5+z5+2⩾5xyz⟹x5+y5+z5−5xyz⩾−2
with equality when x5=y5=z5=1, i.e.\ x=y=z=1. The minimum value is −2.
Examiner Notes
Not very many candidates attempted this question, but those who did usually found it to be relatively straightforward. It was only the very last part that required much thought, and this was where most attempts lost a few marks. A small number of efforts failed to get beyond part (ii); this was due to not finding a suitable function to work with that gave what turns out to be the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality. This was a bit of a shame, since the question actually gives the log. function at the very beginning, along with the sine function, which is used in (i).
8 The points B and C have position vectors b and c, respectively, relative to the origin A, and A,B and C are not collinear.
(i) The point X has position vector sb+tc. Describe the locus of X when s+t=1.
(ii) The point P has position vector βb+γc, where β and γ are non-zero, and β+γ=1. The line AP cuts the line BC at D. Show that BD:DC=γ:β.
(iii) The line BP cuts the line CA at E, and the line CP cuts the line AB at F. Show that
FBAF×DCBD×EACE=1.
Hint
If you don’t know what is wanted in (i), then you really shouldn’t be doing this question. It also really helps if you realise that if s and t are positive, then X is the point between B and C such that BX:XC=t:s. Once you have these ideas in place, this question involves nothing more than finding the points of intersection referred to, by equating two different line equations at a time. You will need to introduce a new pair of parameters each time, but if you keep each stage of working separate, then there is no reason not to use the same two symbols each time; and then solve pairs of simultaneous equations, gained by equating the b- and c-components of the two relevant line vector equations, for these two parameters in terms of β and γ. The result displayed is known as Ceva’s Theorem.
Answers: (i) The straight line through B and C.
Model Solution
Part (i)
When s+t=1, we can write s=1−t, so:
X=(1−t)b+tc
As t varies over R, this traces out the line through B (at t=0) and C (at t=1). The locus of X is the straight line through B and C.
Part (ii)
The line AP consists of points λP=λ(βb+γc) for λ∈R.
The line BC consists of points (1−s)b+sc for s∈R.
At the intersection D, equating coefficients of b and c:
λβ=1−sandλγ=s(...)
Adding the two equations:
λ(β+γ)=1⟹λ=β+γ1
Substituting back: s=λγ=β+γγ.
Since D=(1−s)b+sc with s=γ/(β+γ), the ratio of the coefficients gives:
BD:DC=s:(1−s)=β+γγ:β+γβ=γ:β
Part (iii)
Finding E=BP∩CA:
Points on BP: r=(1−s)b+s(βb+γc)=(1−s+sβ)b+sγc.
Points on CA: r=μc (for μ∈R, since A is the origin and C has position vector c).
Equating coefficients:
1−s+sβ=0andsγ=μ
From the first equation: s(1−β)=−1+1… let me redo this carefully. We need 1−s+sβ=0, so 1=s−sβ=s(1−β), giving:
s=1−β1
Then: μ=sγ=1−βγ, so E=1−βγc.
Finding F=CP∩AB:
Points on CP: r=(1−t)(βb+γc)+tc=β(1−t)b+[γ(1−t)+t]c.
Points on AB: r=νb (for ν∈R).
Equating coefficients:
β(1−t)=νandγ(1−t)+t=0
From the second equation: γ−γt+t=0, so t(1−γ)=−γ, giving:
t=1−γ−γ
Then 1−t=1+1−γγ=1−γ1, so:
ν=β(1−t)=1−γβ
Hence F=1−γβb.
Computing the ratios:
From part (ii): DCBD=βγ.
For EACE: since E=μc with μ=γ/(1−β), we can write E=(1−μ)C+μA. Using the section formula (with directed distances from C to E and from E to A along line CA):
EACE=μ1−μ=1−βγ1−1−βγ=1−βγ1−β1−β−γ=γ1−β−γ
For FBAF: since F=νb with ν=β/(1−γ), we can write F=(1−ν)A+νB. By the same reasoning:
FBAF=1−νν=1−1−γβ1−γβ=1−γ1−β−γ1−γβ=1−β−γβ
Taking the product:
FBAF×DCBD×EACE=1−β−γβ×βγ×γ1−β−γ
=(1−β−γ)⋅β⋅γβ⋅γ⋅(1−β−γ)=1
This is Ceva’s Theorem: the product of the three directed ratios equals 1.
Examiner Notes
This is really just half of the (⇔) proof of Ceva’s Theorem. Several candidates even recognised it as such. Of the remarkably small number of attempts submitted, most fell down at some stage (again) by failing to be sufficiently careful with signs/arithmetic/the modest amounts of algebra involved. It often didn’t help those candidates who chose completely different symbols each time they did a stage of the working.