1 A sequence of points (x1,y1),(x2,y2),… in the cartesian plane is generated by first choosing (x1,y1) then applying the rule, for n=1,2,…,
(xn+1,yn+1)=(xn2−yn2+a,2xnyn+b+2),
where a and b are given real constants.
(i) In the case a=1 and b=−1, find the values of (x1,y1) for which the sequence is constant.
(ii) Given that (x1,y1)=(−1,1), find the values of a and b for which the sequence has period 2.
Hint
1 (i) Given (xn+1,yn+1)=(xn2−yn2+1,2xnyn+1), it is easier to remove the subscripts and set x2−y2+1=x and 2xy+1=y. Then, identifying the y‘s (or x‘s) in each case, gives y2=x2−x+1 and y=1−2x1. Eliminating the y‘s leads to a polynomial equation in x; namely, 4x4−8x3+9x2−5x=0.
Noting the obvious factor of x, and then finding a second linear factor (e.g. by the factor theorem) leads to x(x−1)(4x2−4x+5)=0. Here, the quadratic factor has no real roots, since the discriminant, Δ=42−4⋅4⋅5=−64<0. [Alternatively, one could note that 4x2−4x+5≡(2x−1)2+4>0∀x.]
The two values of x, and the corresponding values of y, gained by substituting these x‘s into y=1−2x1, are then (x,y)=(0,1) and (1,−1).
(ii) Now (x1,y1)=(−1,1)⇒(x2,y2)=(a,b) and (x3,y3)=(a2−b2+a,2ab+b+2). Setting both a2−b2+a=−1 and 2ab+b+2=1, so that the third term is equal to the first, and identifying the b‘s in each case, gives b2=a2+a+1 and b=1+2a−1.
One could go about this the long way, as before. However, it can be noted that the algebra is the same as in (i), but with a=−x and b=−y. Either way, we obtain the two possible solution-pairs: (a,b)=(0,−1) and (−1,1).
However, upon checking, the solution (−1,1) actually gives rise to a constant sequence (and remember that the working only required the third term to be the same as the first, which doesn’t preclude the possibility that it is also the same as the second term!), so we find that there is in fact just the one solution: (a,b)=(0,−1).
Model Solution
Part (i)
For the sequence to be constant, we need (xn+1,yn+1)=(xn,yn) for all n. Dropping subscripts and setting a=1, b=−1:
x2−y2+1=x...(1)2xy−1+2=y⟹2xy+1=y...(2)
From (2): y−2xy=1, so y(1−2x)=1, giving
y=1−2x1provided x=21....(3)
From (1): y2=x2−x+1. \qquad …(4)
Squaring (3) and substituting into (4):
(1−2x)21=x2−x+1
(x2−x+1)(1−2x)2=1
Expanding (1−2x)2=1−4x+4x2:
(x2−x+1)(1−4x+4x2)=4x4−8x3+9x2−5x+1
Setting this equal to 1:
4x4−8x3+9x2−5x=0
x(4x3−8x2+9x−5)=0
Testing x=1: 4−8+9−5=0, so (x−1) is a factor. Dividing:
4x3−8x2+9x−5=(x−1)(4x2−4x+5)
So the equation becomes x(x−1)(4x2−4x+5)=0.
The discriminant of 4x2−4x+5 is Δ=(−4)2−4(4)(5)=16−80=−64<0, so the quadratic has no real roots. (Alternatively, 4x2−4x+5=(2x−1)2+4>0 for all real x.)
Therefore x=0 or x=1.
x=0: from (3), y=11=1, so (x,y)=(0,1).
x=1: from (3), y=1−21=−1, so (x,y)=(1,−1).
Part (ii)
With (x1,y1)=(−1,1):
(x2,y2)=((−1)2−12+a,2(−1)(1)+b+2)=(a,b)
(x3,y3)=(a2−b2+a,2ab+b+2)
For period 2, we require (x3,y3)=(x1,y1) while (x2,y2)=(x1,y1). Setting (x3,y3)=(−1,1):
a2−b2+a=−1...(5)2ab+b+2=1⟹2ab+b=−1...(6)
From (6): b(2a+1)=−1, so b=2a+1−1 (provided a=−21).
From (5): b2=a2+a+1.
These equations are identical in form to those in part (i), with the substitutions a=−x and b=−y. So the solutions are (a,b)=(0,−1) and (a,b)=(−1,1).
We must check which give genuine period 2:
(a,b)=(0,−1): (x1,y1)=(−1,1), (x2,y2)=(0,−1), and (x3,y3)=(0−1+0,0−1+2)=(−1,1). Since (x2,y2)=(x1,y1), this is period 2.
(a,b)=(−1,1): (x2,y2)=(−1,1)=(x1,y1), so the sequence is constant (period 1), not period 2.
The first question is invariably intended to be a gentle introduction to the paper, and to allow all candidates to gain some marks without making great demands on either memory or technical skills. As such, most candidates traditionally tend to begin with question 1, and this proved to be the case here. Almost 700 candidates attempted this question, making it (marginally) the second most popular question on the paper; and it gained the highest mean score of about 14 marks.
There were still several places where marks were commonly lost. In (i), setting (x2,y2)=(x1,y1) and eliminating y (for instance) leads to a quartic equation in x. There were two straightforward linear factors easily found to the quartic expression, leaving a quadratic factor which could yield no real roots. Many candidates failed to explain why, or show that, this was so. In (ii), the algebra again leads to two solutions, gained by setting (x3,y3)=(x1,y1). However, one of them corresponds to one of the solutions already found in (i), where the sequence is constant, and most candidates omitted either to notice this or
to discover it by checking. Another very common oversight – although far less important in the sense that candidates could still gain all the marks by going the long way round – was that the algebra in (ii) was exactly the same as that in (i), but with a=−x and b=−y. For the very few who noticed this, the working for the second half of the question was remarkably swift.
2 Let an be the coefficient of xn in the series expansion, in ascending powers of x, of
(1−x)2(1+x2)1+x,
where ∣x∣<1. Show, using partial fractions, that either an=n+1 or an=n+2 according to the value of n.
Hence find a decimal approximation, to nine significant figures, for the fraction 818111000. [You are not required to justify the accuracy of your approximation.]
Hint
2 The correct partial fraction form for the given algebraic fraction is
(1−x)2(1+x2)1+x≡1−xA+(1−x)2B+1+x2Cx+D,
although these can also be put together in other correct ways that don’t materially hinder the progress of the solution. The standard procedure now is to multiply throughout by the denominator of the LHS and compare coefficients or substitute in suitable values: which leads to A=21, B=1, C=21 and D=−21.
In order to apply the binomial theorem to these separate fractions, we now use index notation to turn
It should be clear at this point that the last two of these series have odd/even powers only, with alternating signs playing an extra part. The consequence of all this is that we need to
examine cases for n modulo 4; i.e. depending upon whether n leaves a remainder of 0, 1, 2 or 3 when divided by 4.
For n≡0(mod4), the coefft. of xn is 21+n+1+0−21=n+1;
A1 for n≡1(mod4), coefft. of xn is 21+n+1+21−0=n+2;
A1 for n≡2(mod4), coefft. of xn is 21+n+1+0+21=n+2;
A1 for n≡3(mod4), coefft. of xn is 21+n+1−21+0=n+1.
For the very final part of the question, we note that 818111000=0.92×1.011.1, is a cancelled form of our original expression, with x=0.1. (N.B. ∣x∣<1 assures the convergence of the infinite series forms). Substituting this value of x into
1+3x+4x2+4x3+5x4+7x5+8x6+8x7+9x8+…
then gives 1.344 578 90 to 8dp.
Model Solution
Partial fraction decomposition
We seek constants A,B,C,D such that
(1−x)2(1+x2)1+x≡1−xA+(1−x)2B+1+x2Cx+D.
Multiplying both sides by (1−x)2(1+x2):
1+x=A(1−x)(1+x2)+B(1+x2)+(Cx+D)(1−x)2.
Setting x=1: 2=2B, so B=1.
Setting x=−1: 0=2A(2)+2B+(−C+D)(4)=4A+2+4(D−C), so 4A+4D−4C=−2, i.e. 2A+2D−2C=−1.
Setting x=0: 1=A+B+D=A+1+D, so A+D=0, i.e. D=−A.
Setting x=2: 3=A(−1)(5)+5B+(2C+D)(1)=−5A+5+2C+D. So −5A+2C+D=−2.
From D=−A: −5A+2C−A=−2, so −6A+2C=−2, i.e. C=3A−1.
From 2A+2D−2C=−1 with D=−A: 2A−2A−2C=−1, so C=21.
an=21+(n+1)+[contribution from 2x(1+x2)−1]+[contribution from −21(1+x2)−1].
The third series 21∑m=0∞(−1)mx2m+1 contributes only to odd powers x2m+1. For n odd with n=2m+1, the contribution is 21(−1)m; for n even, the contribution is 0.
The fourth series −21∑m=0∞(−1)mx2m contributes only to even powers x2m. For n even with n=2m, the contribution is −21(−1)m; for n odd, the contribution is 0.
We examine the four cases for n modulo 4:
Case n≡0(mod4):n=4k (even, m=2k even). Contribution from the fourth series: −21(−1)2k=−21. Third series contributes 0.
an=21+(n+1)+0−21=n+1.
Case n≡1(mod4):n=4k+1 (odd, m=2k even). Contribution from the third series: 21(−1)2k=21. Fourth series contributes 0.
an=21+(n+1)+21+0=n+2.
Case n≡2(mod4):n=4k+2 (even, m=2k+1 odd). Contribution from the fourth series: −21(−1)2k+1=21. Third series contributes 0.
an=21+(n+1)+0+21=n+2.
Case n≡3(mod4):n=4k+3 (odd, m=2k+1 odd). Contribution from the third series: 21(−1)2k+1=−21. Fourth series contributes 0.
an=21+(n+1)−21+0=n+1.
Therefore an=n+1 when n≡0 or 3(mod4), and an=n+2 when n≡1 or 2(mod4).
Decimal approximation for 818111000
We verify that 818111000 equals the original expression with x=0.1:
Noticeably less popular than Q1 – with only around 500 “hits” – and with a very much poorer mean mark of about 8, it was rather obvious that many candidates were very unsure as to what constituted the best partial fraction form for the given algebraic fraction to begin with. Then, with very little direct guidance being given in the question, candidates’ confidence seemed to ebb visibly as they proceeded, being required to turn the resulting collection of single algebraic fractions into series, using the Binomial Theorem, and then into a consideration of general terms. There was much fudging of these general terms in order to get the given answers of either n+1 or n+2 for the general term’s coefficients; even amongst those who did spot which one occurred when, there was often little visible justification to support the conclusions. As a result of all the hurdles to be cleared, those who managed to get to the numerical ending successfully were very few in number.
3 (i) Find the coordinates of the turning points of the curve y=27x3−27x2+4. Sketch the curve and deduce that x2(1−x)⩽4/27 for all x⩾0.
Given that each of the numbers a,b and c lies between 0 and 1, prove by contradiction that at least one of the numbers bc(1−a), ca(1−b) and ab(1−c) is less than or equal to 4/27.
(ii) Given that each of the numbers p and q lies between 0 and 1, prove that at least one of the numbers p(1−q) and q(1−p) is less than or equal to 1/4.
Hint
3 (i) Setting dxdy=81x2−54x=0 for TPs gives (0,4) and (32,0). You really ought to know the shape of such a (“positive”) cubic, and it is customary to find the crossing-points on the axes: x=0 gives y=4, and y=0 leads to x=−1 and x=32 (twice). [If you have been paying attention, this latter zero for y should come as no surprise!] The graph now shows that, for all x≥0, y≥0; which leads to the required result — x2(1−x)≤274 — with just a little bit of re-arrangement.
In order to prove the result by contradiction (reduction ad absurdum), we first assume that all three numbers exceed 274. Then their product
bc(1−a)ca(1−b)ab(1−c)>(274)3.
However, this product can be re-written in the form
a2(1−a)⋅b2(1−b)⋅c2(1−c),
and the previous result guarantees that x2(1−x)≤274 for each of a,b,c, from which it follows that
a2(1−a)⋅b2(1−b)⋅c2(1−c)≤(274)3,
which is the required contradiction. Hence, at least one of the three numbers bc(1−a), ca(1−b), ab(1−c) is less than, or equal to, 274.
(ii) Drawing the graph of y=x−x2 (there are, of course, other suitable choices, such as y=(2x−1)2 for example) and showing that it has a maximum at (21,41) gives
x(1−x)≤41 for all x.
The assumption that p(1−q),q(1−p)>41⟹p(1−p)⋅q(1−q)>(41)2.
However, we know that x(1−x)≤41 for each of p and q, and this gives us that
p(1−p)⋅q(1−q)≤(41)2.
Hence, by contradiction, at least one of p(1−q),q(1−p)≤41.
Model Solution
Part (i)
We have y=27x3−27x2+4. Differentiating:
dxdy=81x2−54x=27x(3x−2).
Setting dxdy=0 gives x=0 or x=32.
At x=0: y=4, so one turning point is (0,4).
At x=32: y=27⋅278−27⋅94+4=8−12+4=0, so the other turning point is (32,0).
To determine the nature of each turning point, we compute dx2d2y=162x−54.
At x=0: dx2d2y=−54<0, so (0,4) is a local maximum.
At x=32: dx2d2y=108−54=54>0, so (32,0) is a local minimum.
The y-intercept is (0,4). Setting y=0:
27x3−27x2+4=0.
We can check that x=32 is a root (already found above), so (3x−2) is a factor. Dividing:
The sketch shows a positive cubic with a local maximum at (0,4), touching the x-axis at (32,0) (since it is a double root), and crossing at x=−31.
For x≥0, the curve starts at y=4 when x=0, decreases to touch y=0 at x=32, then increases without bound. Therefore y≥0 for all x≥0, i.e.
27x3−27x2+4≥0for all x≥0.
Rearranging: 27x2(1−x)≤4, so
x2(1−x)≤274for all x≥0.(⋆)
Now we prove the main result by contradiction. Suppose, for contradiction, that all three numbers bc(1−a), ca(1−b), ab(1−c) are strictly greater than 274. Then their product satisfies:
bc(1−a)⋅ca(1−b)⋅ab(1−c)>(274)3.
The left-hand side can be rearranged:
a2b2c2(1−a)(1−b)(1−c)=a2(1−a)⋅b2(1−b)⋅c2(1−c).
Since 0<a<1, we have a≥0, so by (⋆) with x=a: a2(1−a)≤274. Similarly b2(1−b)≤274 and c2(1−c)≤274.
Therefore:
a2(1−a)⋅b2(1−b)⋅c2(1−c)≤(274)3.
This contradicts our assumption. Hence at least one of bc(1−a), ca(1−b), ab(1−c) must be less than or equal to 274.
Part (ii)
Consider the function g(x)=x(1−x)=x−x2. Then g′(x)=1−2x=0 gives x=21, and g′′(x)=−2<0 confirms this is a maximum. The maximum value is g(21)=41.
Therefore x(1−x)≤41 for all x.
Now suppose, for contradiction, that both p(1−q)>41 and q(1−p)>41. Multiplying:
p(1−q)⋅q(1−p)>161.
The left-hand side equals p(1−p)⋅q(1−q).
Since 0<p<1: p(1−p)≤41. Since 0<q<1: q(1−q)≤41.
Therefore p(1−p)⋅q(1−q)≤161, contradicting the assumption. Hence at least one of p(1−q), q(1−p) is less than or equal to 41.
This, the third most popular question on the paper, producing a mixed bag of responses. It strikes me that, although the A-level specifications require candidates to understand the process of proof by contradiction, this is never actually tested anywhere by any of the exam. boards. Nonetheless, it was very pleasing to see that so many candidates were able to grasp the basic idea of what to do, and many did so very successfully. The impartial observer might well note that the situation in (i) is very much tougher (in terms of degree) than that in (ii). However, candidates were very much more closely guided in (i) and then left to make their own way in (ii).
Apart from the standard, expected response to (i) – see the SOLUTIONS document for this – many other candidates produced a very pleasing alternative which they often dressed up as proof by contradiction but which was, in fact, a direct proof. It was, however, so mathematically sound and appealing an argument (and a legitimate imitation of a p by c) that we gave it all but one of the marks available in this part of the question. It ran like this:
Suppose w.l.o.g. that 0<a≤b≤c<1.
Then ab(1−c)≤b2(1−b)≤274 by the previous result
(namely x2(1−x)≤274 for all x≥0).
QED.
[Note that we could have used ab(1−c)≤c2(1−c)≤274 also.]
It has to be said that most other inequality arguments were rather poorly constructed and unconvincing, leaving the markers with little option but to put a line through (often) several pages of circular arguments, faulty assumptions, dubious conclusions, and occasionally correct statements with either no supporting reasoning or going nowhere useful.
There was one remarkable alternative which was produced by just a couple of candidates (that I know of) and is not included in the SOLUTIONS because it is such a rarity. However, for those who know of the AM – GM Inequality, it is sufficiently appealing to include it here for novelty value. It ran like this:
Assume that bc(1−a),ca(1−b),ab(1−c)>274.
Using the previous result, we have a2(1−a),b2(1−b),c2(1−c)≤274.
Then, since all terms are positive, it follows that a2≤bc,b2≤ca,c2≤ab so that
a2+b2+c2≤bc+ca+ab.(∗)
However, by the AM – GM Inequality (or directly by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality),
a2+b2≥2ab,b2+c2≥2bc and c2+a2≥2ca.
Adding and dividing by two then gives a2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca, which contradicts the conclusion (*), etc., etc.
where a is a constant satisfying 0<a<1. Show that the gradient of the curve at the point P with coordinates (x,y) is
−ax+yx+ay,
provided ax+y=0. Show that θ, the acute angle between OP and the normal to the curve at P, satisfies
tanθ=a∣y2−x2∣.
Show further that, if dxdθ=0 at P, then:
(i) a(x2+y2)+2xy=0;
(ii) (1+a)(x2+y2+2xy)=1;
(iii) tanθ=1−a2a.
Hint
4 Differentiating implicitly gives 2(x+ydxdy+axdxdy+ay)=0, from which it follows that
dxdy=−ax+yx+ay and hence the gradient of the normal is x+ayax+y.
Using tan(A−B) on this and xy gives tanθ=1+xy×x+ayax+yxy−x+ayax+y=x2+axy+axy+y2xy+ay2−ax2−xy.
However, we know that x2+y2+2axy=1 from the curve’s eqn., and so
tanθ=a∣y2−x2∣.
(i) Differentiating this w.r.t. x then gives sec2θdxdθ=a(2ydxdy−2x). Equating this to zero and using dxdy=−ax+yx+ay from earlier then leads to a(x2+y2)+2xy=0.
(ii) Adding x2+y2+2axy=1 and a(x2+y2)+2xy=0 gives (1+a)(x+y)2=1.
(iii) However, subtracting these two eqns. instead gives (1−a)(y−x)2=1, and multiplying these two last results together yields (1−a2)(y2−x2)2=1.
Finally, using tanθ=a∣y2−x2∣⇒(y2−x2)2=a21tan2θ, and substituting this
into the last result of (iii) then gives the required result: tanθ=1−a2a. All that
remains is to justify taking the positive square root, since tanθ is | something |, which is necessarily non-negative.
Model Solution
Finding the gradient
Differentiating x2+y2+2axy=1 implicitly with respect to x:
2x+2ydxdy+2a(xdxdy+y)=0.
Dividing by 2 and collecting terms in dxdy:
x+ay+(y+ax)dxdy=0.
Therefore:
dxdy=−ax+yx+ay,provided ax+y=0.
Finding tanθ
The gradient of OP (from the origin to P(x,y)) is xy, provided x=0.
The gradient of the normal to the curve at P is the negative reciprocal of dxdy:
mnormal=x+ayax+y.
The angle θ between OP and the normal is given by:
Another very popular question, poorly done (600 attempts, mean score below 7). Most efforts got little further than finding the gradient of the normal to the curve, and I strongly suspect that this question was frequently to be found amongst candidates’ non-contributing scorers. Using the tan(A−B) formula is a sufficiently common occurrence on past papers that there is little excuse for well-prepared candidates not to recognise when and how to apply it. Once that has been done, the question’s careful structuring guided able candidates over the hurdles one at a time, each result relying on the preceding result(s); yet most attempts had finished quite early on, and the majority of candidates failed to benefit from the setters’ kindness.
Show, using the binomial expansion, that (1+2)5<99. Show also that 2>1.4. Deduce that 22>1+2. Use this result to determine which of the above integrals is greater.
Hint
5 Using a well-known double-angle formula gives ∫0π/21+sin2xsin2xdx=∫0π/21+sin2x2sinxcosxdx, and
this should suggest an obvious substitution: letting s=sinx turns this into the integral
∫011+s22sds.
This is just a standard log. integral (the numerator being the derivative of the denominator), leading to the answer ln2.
Alternatively, one could use the identity sin2x≡21−21cos2x to end up with
∫0π/23−cos2x2sin2xdx.
This, again, gives a log. integral, but without the substitution.
A suitable substitution for the second integral is c=cosx, which leads to ∫012−c21dc.
Now you can either attack this using partial fractions, or you could look up what is a fairly standard result in your formula booklet. In each case, you get (after a bit of careful log and
surd work) 21ln(1+2).
Now (1+2)5=1+52+20+202+20+42=41+292 (using the binomial theorem, for instance), and
41+292<99⇔292<58⇔2<2,
which is obviously the case. Also, 1.96<2⇒1.4<2. Thereafter, an argument such as
21.4>1+2⇔27>(1+2)5⇔128>41+292
⇔87>292⇔3>2
from which it follows that 22>27/5>1+2.
Taking logs in this result then gives 2ln2>ln(1+2)⇒ln2>21ln(1+2); and
∫0π/21+sin2xsin2xdx>∫0π/21+sin2xsinxdx.
Model Solution
First integral
Using sin2x=2sinxcosx:
∫0π/21+sin2xsin2xdx=∫0π/21+sin2x2sinxcosxdx.
Let s=sinx, so ds=cosxdx. When x=0, s=0; when x=π/2, s=1.
This was the most popular question on the paper (by a small margin) and with the second highest mean mark (12) of all the pure questions. Those who were able to spot the two standard trig. substitutions s=sinx and c=cosx for the first two parts generally made excellent progress, although the log. and surd work required to tidy up the second integral’s answer left many with a correct answer that wasn’t easy to do anything much useful with at the very end, when deciding which was numerically the greater. The binomial expansion of (a+b)5 was handled very comfortably, as was much of the following inequality work. However, the very final conclusion was very seldom successfully handled as any little mistakes, unhelpful forms of answers, etc., prevented candidates’ final thoughts from being sufficiently relevant.
(ii) Determine all values of x in the interval −π⩽x⩽π for which f(x)=0. Find a value of x in this interval at which the curve touches the x-axis without crossing it.
(iii) Find the value or values of x in the interval 0⩽x⩽2π for which f(x)=2.
Hint
(i) Firstly, cosx has period 2π⇒cos(2x) has period π; and sinx has period 2π⇒sin(23x) has period 34π.
Then f(x)=cos(2x+3π)+sin(23x−4π) has period 4π=lcm(π,34π).
(ii) Any approach here is going to require the use of some trig. identity work. The most straightforward is to note that cos(2π+θ)=−sinθ so that f(x)=0 reduces to
cos(2x+3π)=cos(23x+4π), from which it follows that 2x+3π=2nπ±(23x+4π)
where n is an integer, using the symmetric and periodic properties of the cosine curve. Taking suitable values of n, so that x is in the required interval, leads to the answers
x=−4231π (from n=−1, with the − sign), x=−6π (n=0, with both + and − signs),
x=4217π (n=1, − sign) and x=4241π (n=2, − sign).
Since x=−6π is a repeated root (occurring twice in the above list), the curve of y=f(x) touches the x-axis at this point.
For those who are aware of the results that appear in all the formula books, but which seem to be on the edge of the various syllabuses, that I know by the title of the Sum-and-Product Formulae, such as
cosA+cosB≡2cos(2A+B)cos(2A−B), there is a
second straightforward approach available here. For example, noting that
cos(2π−θ)=sinθ gives cos(2x+3π)+cos(43π−23x)=0 which (from the above
identity) then gives 2cos(4x+2413π)cos(47x−245π)=0, and setting each of these two
cosine terms equal to zero, in turn, yields the same values of x as before, including the repeat.
(iii) The key observation here is that y=2 if and only if both cos(2x+3π)=1 and
sin(23x−4π)=1, simultaneously. So we must solve
cos(2x+3π)=1⇒2x+3π=0,2π,4π,…, giving x=65π,611π,…; and
sin(23x−4π)=1⇒23x−4π=2π,25π,…, giving x=2π,611π,….
Both equations are satisfied when x=611π, and this is the required answer.
Model Solution
Part (i): Period of f(x)
The term cos(2x+π/3) has period 22π=π.
The term sin(23x−4π) has period 3/22π=34π.
The period of f(x) is lcm(π,34π). Writing π=33π, we need the smallest positive T such that T=mπ=n⋅34π for positive integers m,n. This gives 3m=4n, so the smallest solution is m=4,n=3, giving T=4π.
The period of f(x) is 4π.
Part (ii): Solving f(x)=0 for −π≤x≤π
We rewrite the sine term using sinθ=−cos(2π+θ):
sin(23x−4π)=−cos(2π+23x−4π)=−cos(23x+4π).
So f(x)=0 becomes:
cos(2x+3π)=cos(23x+4π).
Using cosA=cosB⟺A=2nπ±B:
2x+3π=2nπ±(23x+4π).
Case 1 (+ sign):
2x+3π=2nπ+23x+4π
2x=2nπ+4π−3π=2nπ−12π
x=4nπ−6π.
For x∈[−π,π]: only n=0 gives x=−6π.
Case 2 (− sign):
2x+3π=2nπ−23x−4π
27x=2nπ−4π−3π=2nπ−127π
x=74nπ−6π=4224nπ−7π=42(24n−7)π.
For x∈[−π,π], we need −42≤24n−7≤42, i.e. −35≤24n≤49, so n=−1,0,1,2:
n=−1: x=42−31π
n=0: x=42−7π=−6π
n=1: x=4217π
n=2: x=4241π
The complete set of solutions is:
x=−4231π,x=−6π,x=4217π,x=4241π.
Since x=−6π arises from both the ”+” case (Case 1) and the "−" case (Case 2 with n=0), it is a repeated root. This means the curve touches the x-axis at x=−6π without crossing it.
Part (iii): Solving f(x)=2 for 0≤x≤2π
Since −1≤cos(2x+3π)≤1 and −1≤sin(23x−4π)≤1, and their sum equals 2, both terms must simultaneously equal 1:
cos(2x+3π)=1andsin(23x−4π)=1.
From the first equation: 2x+3π=2kπ for integer k, so x=kπ−6π.
For x∈[0,2π]: k=1 gives x=65π; k=2 gives x=611π.
From the second equation: 23x−4π=2π+2mπ for integer m, so 23x=43π+2mπ, giving x=2π+34mπ.
For x∈[0,2π]: m=0 gives x=2π; m=1 gives x=2π+34π=611π.
The only value satisfying both equations is x=611π.
Examiner Notes
This was the least popular of the pure maths questions. Although there were 300 starts to the question, most of these barely got into the very opening part before the attempt was abandoned in favour of another question. Most attempts failed to show that f(x) has a period of 4π. As mentioned, few proceeded further. Of those who did, efforts were generally very poor indeed – as testified to by the very low mean mark of 4 – with the necessary comfort in handling even the most basic of trig. identities being very conspicuous by its absence. Part (iii) was my personal favourite amongst the pure questions, as it contained a very uncommon – yet remarkably simple – idea in order to get started on the road to a solution. The idea is simply this: f(x), being the sum of a cosine term and sine term, is equal to 2 if and only if each of these separate terms is simultaneously at its maximum of 1. That is, the question is actually two very easy trig. equations disguised as one very complicated-looking one. Once realised, the whole thing becomes very straightforward indeed, but only a few candidates had persevered this far.
7 (i) By writing y=u(1+x2)21, where u is a function of x, find the solution of the equation
y1dxdy=xy+1+x2x
for which y=1 when x=0.
(ii) Find the solution of the equation
y1dxdy=x2y+1+x3x2
for which y=1 when x=0.
(iii) Give, without proof, a conjecture for the solution of the equation
y1dxdy=xn−1y+1+xnxn−1
for which y=1 when x=0, where n is an integer greater than 1.
Hint
(i) Differentiating y=u1+x2 gives dxdy=u⋅1+x2x+1+x2⋅dxdu; so that
y1dxdy=xy+1+x2x becomes u1+x21{1+x2ux+1+x2⋅dxdu}=xu1+x2+1+x2x.
Simplifying and cancelling the common term on both sides leads to
u1⋅dxdu=xu1+x2.
This is a standard form for a first-order differential equation, involving the separation of variables and integration:
∫u21⋅du=∫x1+x2 dx⇒−u1=31(1+x2)3/2(+C).
Using x=0,y=1 (u=1) to find C leads to the final answer, y=4−(1+x2)3/231+x2.
(ii) The key here is to choose the appropriate function of x. If you have really got a feel for what has happened in the previous bit of the question, then this isn’t too demanding. If you haven’t really grasped fully what’s going on then you may well need to try one or two possibilities first. The product that needs to be identified here is y=u(1+x3)1/3. Once you have found this, the process of (i) pretty much repeats itself.
dxdy=u⋅x2(1+x3)−2/3+(1+x3)1/3dxdu means that y1dxdy=x2y+1+x3x2 becomes
u1⋅dxdu=x2u(1+x3)1/3.
Separating variables and integrating:
∫u21⋅du=∫x2(1+x3)1/3 dx=−u1=41(1+x3)4/3(+C);
and x=0,y=1 (u=1) gives C and the answer y=5−(1+x3)4/34(1+x3)1/3.
(iii) Note that the question didn’t actually require you to simplify the two answers in (i) and (ii), but doing so certainly enables you to have a better idea as to how to generalise the results:
y=(n+2)−(1+xn)1+1/n(n+1)(1+xn)1/n.
Model Solution
Part (i)
Let y=u(1+x2)1/2. Differentiating using the product rule:
dxdy=u⋅(1+x2)1/2x+(1+x2)1/2dxdu.
Dividing by y=u(1+x2)1/2:
y1dxdy=1+x2x+u1dxdu.
The original equation is y1dxdy=xy+1+x2x. Substituting the expression above:
1+x2x+u1dxdu=xu1+x2+1+x2x.
Cancelling 1+x2x from both sides:
u1dxdu=xu1+x2.
dxdu=xu21+x2.
Separating variables:
∫u2du=∫x1+x2dx.
For the right-hand side, let w=1+x2, dw=2xdx:
∫x1+x2dx=21∫w1/2dw=31w3/2=31(1+x2)3/2.
So:
−u1=31(1+x2)3/2+C.
Using the condition y=1 when x=0: u=(1+x2)1/2yx=0=1.
−1=31+C⟹C=−34.
−u1=31(1+x2)3/2−34=3(1+x2)3/2−4.
u=4−(1+x2)3/23.
Therefore:
y=u(1+x2)1/2=4−(1+x2)3/231+x2.
Part (ii)
The structure of part (i) suggests the substitution y=u(1+x3)1/3. Differentiating:
dxdy=u⋅x2(1+x3)−2/3+(1+x3)1/3dxdu.
Dividing by y=u(1+x3)1/3:
y1dxdy=1+x3x2+u1dxdu.
The original equation is y1dxdy=x2y+1+x3x2. Substituting:
The pattern from parts (i) and (ii) generalises. For the equation
y1dxdy=xn−1y+1+xnxn−1,
the substitution y=u(1+xn)1/n leads to the solution
y=(n+2)−(1+xn)1+1/n(n+1)(1+xn)1/n.
Examiner Notes
In many ways, part (i) of the question was very routine, requiring little more than technical competence to see the differential equation, using the given substitution, through to a correct solution. Part (ii) then required candidates to spot a slightly different substitution on the basis of having gained a feel for what had gone on previously. I had thought that many more candidates would try something involving the square root of 1+x3 or the cube root of 1+x2, rather than cube root of 1+x3, but many solutions that I saw went straight for the right thing. Once this had been successfully pushed through – with the working mimicking that of (i) very closely indeed – it was not difficult to spot the general answer required, unproven, in (iii). Overall, however, it seems that a lot of candidates failed to spot the right thing for part (ii) and their solutions stopped at this point. With almost 600 attempts, the mean score on this question was 10.
8 The points A and B have position vectors a and b, respectively, relative to the origin O. The points A, B and O are not collinear. The point P lies on AB between A and B such that
AP:PB=(1−λ):λ.
Write down the position vector of P in terms of a, b and λ. Given that OP bisects ∠AOB, determine λ in terms of a and b, where a=∣a∣ and b=∣b∣.
The point Q also lies on AB between A and B, and is such that AP=BQ. Prove that
OQ2−OP2=(b−a)2.
Hint
The first result is an example of what is known as the Ratio Theorem:
AP:PB=1−λ:λ⇒p=λa+(1−λ)b.
Alternatively, it can be deduced from the standard approach to the vector equation of a straight line, via r=a+λ(b−a).
Using the scalar product twice then gives
a∙p=λa2+(1−λ)(a∙b) and b∙p=λ(a∙b)+(1−λ)b2.
Equating these two expressions for cosθ, apa∙p=bpb∙p, re-arranging and collecting up
like terms, then gives ab{λ(a+b)−b}=a∙b{λ(a+b)−b}. There are two possible consequences to this statement, and both of them should be considered. Either ab=a∙b, which gives cos2θ=1, θ=0, A=B and violates the non-collinearity of O,A & B; or the bracketed factor on each side is zero, which gives
λ=a+bb.
However, if you know the Angle Bisector Theorem, the working is short-circuited quite dramatically:
PBAP=OBOA⇒λ(AB)(1−λ)(AB)=ba⇒b−bλ=aλ⇒λ=a+bb.
Next, AQ:QB=λ:1−λ⇒q=(1−λ)a+λb.
Then
OQ2=q∙q=(1−λ)2a2+λ2b2+2λ(1−λ)a∙b
and OP2=p∙p=(1−λ)2b2+λ2a2+2λ(1−λ)a∙b.
[N.B. This working can also be done by the Cosine Rule.]
Subtracting:
OQ2−OP2=(b2−a2)[λ2−(1−λ)2]=(b2−a2)(2λ−1)
and, substituting λ in terms of a and b into this expression, gives the required answer
=(b−a)(b+a)×b+ab−a=(b−a)2.
Model Solution
Position vector of P
Since P lies on AB with AP:PB=(1−λ):λ, by the section formula (ratio theorem):
p=λa+(1−λ)b.
This can be seen from the vector equation of the line AB: r=a+t(b−a), where P corresponds to t=λ (since AP=λ⋅AB and PB=(1−λ)⋅AB).
Finding λ when OP bisects ∠AOB
Let ∠AOB=2θ. If OP bisects ∠AOB, then ∠AOP=∠BOP=θ. Using the scalar product:
cosθ=a⋅pa⋅p=b⋅pb⋅p
so b(a⋅p)=a(b⋅p). We compute each dot product:
a⋅p=a⋅(λa+(1−λ)b)=λa2+(1−λ)(a⋅b)
b⋅p=b⋅(λa+(1−λ)b)=λ(a⋅b)+(1−λ)b2
Substituting into b(a⋅p)=a(b⋅p):
b[λa2+(1−λ)(a⋅b)]=a[λ(a⋅b)+(1−λ)b2]
Expanding both sides:
λa2b+(1−λ)b(a⋅b)=λa(a⋅b)+(1−λ)ab2
Collecting terms with λ on the left and terms with (1−λ) on the right:
λ[a2b−a(a⋅b)]=(1−λ)[ab2−b(a⋅b)]
λ⋅a[ab−a⋅b]=(1−λ)⋅b[ab−a⋅b]
Since O, A, B are not collinear, a⋅b=ab (the angle between a and b is not zero), so we can divide both sides by ab−a⋅b:
λa=(1−λ)b
λa+λb=b
λ=a+bb
Alternatively, this follows immediately from the Angle Bisector Theorem: PBAP=OBOA=ba, so λ1−λ=ba, giving λ=a+bb.
Proving OQ2−OP2=(b−a)2
Since AP=BQ, and AP=(1−λ)⋅AB, we have BQ=(1−λ)⋅AB. Since Q lies on AB between A and B:
As with Q6, this was both an unpopular question and poorly done. Those candidates who did do well generally did so after spotting that they could use the Angle Bisector Theorem to polish off the first half of the question, expressing λ in terms of a and b almost immediately. Predominantly, the whole thing relied almost exclusively upon the use of the scalar product (or, alternatively, the Cosine Rule) and a bit of manipulation. The fact that the mean mark on this question was below 7 is simply indicative of the general lack of confidence amongst candidates where vectors are concerned.