1 Consider the cubic equation
x3−px2+qx−r=0,
where p=0 and r=0.
(i) If the three roots can be written in the form ak−1, a and ak for some constants a and k, show that one root is q/p and that q3−rp3=0.
(ii) If r=q3/p3, show that q/p is a root and that the product of the other two roots is (q/p)2. Deduce that the roots are in geometric progression.
(iii) Find a necessary and sufficient condition involving p, q and r for the roots to be in arithmetic progression.
Model Solution
Part (i) Show that one root is q/p and that q3−rp3=0.
Let the three roots be ak−1, a, and ak. By Vieta’s formulas for x3−px2+qx−r=0:
p=ak−1+a+ak=a(k−1+1+k),(...1)
q=(ak−1)(a)+(ak−1)(ak)+(a)(ak)=a2(k−1+1+k),(...2)
r=(ak−1)(a)(ak)=a3.(...3)
From (1) and (2), dividing q by p:
pq=a(k−1+1+k)a2(k−1+1+k)=a.
So a=q/p is one of the three roots, as required.
From (3), r=a3=(q/p)3, hence rp3=q3, i.e.
q3−rp3=0.■
Part (ii) Show that q/p is a root and the product of the other two roots is (q/p)2; deduce the roots are in GP.
Suppose r=q3/p3. We check that x=q/p is a root:
(pq)3−p(pq)2+q(pq)−r=p3q3−pq2+pq2−p3q3=0.✓
So q/p is a root. Let the other two roots be α and β. By Vieta’s formulas:
pq+α+β=p,pq⋅αβ=r=p3q3.
From the second relation:
αβ=p3q3⋅qp=p2q2=(pq)2.
Now α+β=p−q/p and αβ=(q/p)2. The roots α,β satisfy
x2−(p−pq)x+(pq)2=0.
The three roots are q/p, α, β with αβ=(q/p)2. Since the product of all three roots is r=(q/p)3 and one root is q/p, the remaining product is (q/p)2, meaning
α⋅β=(pq)2.
If β=α(q/p)2, then the three roots q/p, α, α(q/p)2 are in geometric progression with common ratio q/pα=qpα. Indeed, α(q/p)2=α/(q/p)q/p confirms the GP structure. ■
Part (iii) Necessary and sufficient condition for roots in arithmetic progression.
Let the three roots be a−d, a, a+d (common difference d). By Vieta’s:
From q=3a2−d2 we get d2=3a2−q. Substituting into r:
r=a(3a2−d2−(3a2−d2)+d2)wait, let me redo this cleanly.
r=a(a2−d2)=a⋅q−2a3+a3no.
We have d2=3a2−q and r=a(a2−d2)=a(a2−3a2+q)=a(q−2a2).
With a=p/3:
r=3p(q−92p2)=3pq−272p3.
Multiplying through by 27:
27r=9pq−2p3.
Rearranging:
2p3−9pq+27r=0.
This is the necessary and sufficient condition for the roots to be in arithmetic progression.
Verification of sufficiency: If 2p3−9pq+27r=0, then r=279pq−2p3=3p(q−92p2), and setting a=p/3, d2=3a2−q=3p2−q, the cubic factors as (x−a+d)(x−a)(x−a+d), giving three real roots in AP (when d2≥0, i.e. q≤p2/3, the roots are distinct or repeated).
2 (i) Let f(x)=(1+x2)ex. Show that f′(x)⩾0 and sketch the graph of f(x). Hence, or otherwise, show that the equation
(1+x2)ex=k,
where k is a constant, has exactly one real root if k>0 and no real roots if k⩽0.
(ii) Determine the number of real roots of the equation
(ex−1)−ktan−1x=0
in the cases (a) 0<k⩽2/π and (b) 2/π<k<1.
Model Solution
Part (i) Show f′(x)≥0, sketch f, and determine roots of (1+x2)ex=k.
Let f(x)=(1+x2)ex. Differentiating:
f′(x)=2xex+(1+x2)ex=ex(1+2x+x2)=ex(1+x)2.
Since ex>0 for all x and (1+x)2≥0 for all x, we have f′(x)≥0 for all x, with equality only at x=−1.
Therefore f is non-decreasing (strictly increasing except at x=−1 where it has a stationary inflection point).
Key features of the graph:
f(0)=1, f(−1)=2e−1=2/e.
As x→+∞: f(x)→+∞ (exponential growth dominates).
As x→−∞: f(x)→0+ (since ex→0 and 1+x2 grows polynomially, but ex decays faster).
Since f is non-decreasing with limx→−∞f(x)=0 and limx→+∞f(x)=+∞, the range of f is (0,+∞).
For k>0: the horizontal line y=k crosses the graph of f exactly once (since f is non-decreasing and its range is (0,+∞)), so the equation has exactly one real root.
For k≤0: since f(x)=(1+x2)ex>0 for all x (as 1+x2>0 and ex>0), the equation has no real roots.
Part (ii) Determine the number of real roots of (ex−1)−karctanx=0.
Let g(x)=ex−1−karctanx. Note g(0)=0, so x=0 is always a root. We need to determine if there are other roots.
g′(x)=ex−1+x2k.
Case (a): 0<k≤2/π.
We claim g(x)<0 for x<0 and g(x)>0 for x>0, so x=0 is the only root.
For x>0: We show ex−1>karctanx. Since ex>1+x for x>0 (standard inequality from the Taylor series), and arctanx<x for x>0:
ex−1>x>k⋅(we need a tighter bound)x.
Better approach: consider h(x)=arctanxex−1 for x>0. We need h(x)>k. As x→0+, by L’Hopital:
limx→0+h(x)=limx→0+1/(1+x2)ex=1.
As x→+∞: h(x)≈π/2ex→+∞.
We compute h′(x) to check monotonicity. Actually, let us instead check g′(x)>0 for all x>0, which would mean g is strictly increasing on (0,∞) and hence g(x)>g(0)=0 for x>0.
g′(x)=ex−1+x2k.
For x>0: ex>1 and 1+x2k<k≤π2<1. So g′(x)>0 for all x>0.
Hence g is strictly increasing on (0,∞), giving g(x)>0 for x>0.
For x<0: We need g(x)<0, i.e. ex−1<karctanx. Note both sides are negative for x<0. Rearranging: 1−ex>k∣arctanx∣ (both sides positive).
Consider g′(x)=ex−1+x2k for x<0. We have ex<1 and 1+x2k≥1+x2k. At x≤−1: ex≤e−1≈0.37 and 1+x2k≥1+x2k; we need more care.
Let us check g′(x) for x<0. We have g′(0)=1−k>0 (since k≤2/π<1). Also g′(x)→0−0=0 as x→−∞ (wait, ex→0 and 1+x2k→0, so g′(x)→0).
Actually, let’s verify g′(x)<0 is impossible for x<0 when k≤2/π. We need ex<1+x2k, i.e. (1+x2)ex<k≤2/π.
From Part (i), f(x)=(1+x2)ex is non-decreasing with minimum value approaching 0. So for x very negative, f(x)<2/π, meaning g′(x)<0 is possible there. But this just means g decreases before it increases.
The key insight: g(x)→−1−k(−π/2)=−1+kπ/2 as x→−∞. For k≤2/π: −1+kπ/2≤−1+1=0. So g(x)≤0 as x→−∞, with equality only when k=2/π.
For k<2/π: g(x)→−1+kπ/2<0 as x→−∞. Since g(0)=0 and g is continuous, if g had a root at some x0<0 with g(x0)=0, then between −∞ and x0 or between x0 and 0, g would need to cross zero. Since g′(x)<0 for very negative x (where (1+x2)ex is small), g is decreasing there. Then g′ changes sign at most once (since (1+x2)ex is non-decreasing), so g has at most one local minimum. If g goes from negative values, reaches a minimum, then increases to g(0)=0, it stays negative for all x<0.
For k=2/π: g(x)→0 as x→−∞. Since g is negative for large negative x (it approaches 0 from below, because ex approaches 0 faster than karctanx approaches −kπ/2, making ex−1≈−1 while karctanx≈−1, but ex−1<−1+kπ/2=0 for any finite x), the same argument gives no additional roots.
Conclusion for case (a): The only real root is x=0.
Case (b): 2/π<k<1.
Now g(x)→−1+kπ/2>0 as x→−∞. Since g(0)=0 and g is continuous, g must cross zero at least once for x<0 (since it starts positive and reaches 0).
More precisely: g(−∞)=kπ/2−1>0 and g(0)=0. If g stayed positive on (−∞,0), it would need g′(0)≤0, but g′(0)=1−k>0. So g must go below zero somewhere in (−∞,0), meaning it crosses zero at least twice on (−∞,0) (once going down, once coming back up to g(0)=0).
To count precisely, consider g′(x)=ex−1+x2k. Let ϕ(x)=(1+x2)ex. Then g′(x)=0 iff ϕ(x)=k. From Part (i), ϕ(x)=k>0 has exactly one real root x0. Since k<1=ϕ(0), we have x0<0.
So g′(x)<0 for x<x0 and g′(x)>0 for x>x0. This means g decreases on (−∞,x0) and increases on (x0,∞), with a unique minimum at x0.
Since g(−∞)=kπ/2−1>0, g decreases from positive values to g(x0), then increases to g(0)=0 and beyond (since g′(0)>0, g is increasing at 0, so g(x)>0 for x>0).
If g(x0)<0: g crosses zero once on (−∞,x0) and once on (x0,0), giving 2 negative roots plus x=0, total 3 roots.
If g(x0)=0: g touches zero at x0 and at 0, total 2 roots.
If g(x0)>0: g never crosses zero on (−∞,0) except at x=0 where it reaches 0 from above. But g′(0)=1−k>0 means g is increasing at 0, so g(x)<0 just to the left of 0. This contradicts g(x0)>0 and g being increasing on (x0,0).
Wait, let me reconsider. g is increasing on (x0,0) with g(0)=0. If g(x0)>0, then g would decrease from g(−∞)>0 to g(x0)>0 (never crossing zero), then increase from g(x0)>0 to g(0)=0… but g increasing on (x0,0) with g(0)=0 requires g(x0)<0. Contradiction.
So g(x0)<0 is forced. Therefore g crosses zero exactly once on (−∞,x0) and exactly once on (x0,0) (since g is monotone on each interval).
Conclusion for case (b): There are exactly 3 real roots: one negative (left of x0), one negative (between x0 and 0), and x=0.
Hmm, wait. Let me recount. g starts at kπ/2−1>0 as x→−∞, decreases to g(x0)<0, then increases to g(0)=0. So g crosses zero exactly once on (−∞,x0) (from positive to negative). On (x0,0), g increases from negative to 0, so g(x)<0 on (x0,0) and g(0)=0. So the only crossing is one root in (−∞,x0), plus x=0.
For x>0: g′(x)>0 and g(0)=0, so g(x)>0 for x>0, no additional roots.
Conclusion for case (b): There are exactly 2 real roots: one negative root and x=0.
3 Justify, by means of a sketch, the formula
limn→∞{n1∑m=1nf(1+m/n)}=∫12f(x)dx.
Show that
limn→∞{n+11+n+21+⋯+n+n1}=ln2.
Evaluate
limn→∞{n2+1n+n2+4n+⋯+n2+n2n}.
Model Solution
Part (i): Justifying the Riemann sum formula
Consider the integral ∫12f(x)dx. We partition the interval [1,2] into n equal sub-intervals, each of width Δx=n2−1=n1.
The partition points are x0=1,x1=1+n1,x2=1+n2,…,xn=2.
The right-hand Riemann sum uses the value of f at the right endpoint of each sub-interval:
Sketch: For a continuous function f on [1,2], the Riemann sum represents the total area of n rectangles of width n1, where the m-th rectangle has height f(1+m/n). As n→∞, these rectangles fill the region under the curve y=f(x) from x=1 to x=2 more and more precisely, so the sum converges to the definite integral. Hence
limn→∞{n1∑m=1nf(1+nm)}=∫12f(x)dx.
Part (ii): Showing the limit equals ln2
We rewrite the sum by dividing numerator and denominator of each term by n:
4 A polyhedron is a solid bounded by F plane faces, which meet in E edges and V vertices. You may assume Euler’s formula, that V−E+F=2.
In a regular polyhedron the faces are equal regular m-sided polygons, n of which meet at each vertex. Show that
F=h4n,
where h=4−(n−2)(m−2).
By considering the possible values of h, or otherwise, prove that there are only five regular polyhedra, and find V, E and F for each.
Model Solution
Part (i): Deriving the formula F=h4n
Each face is a regular m-gon, so each face has m edges. Since every edge is shared by exactly two faces, counting edge-face incidences gives
2E=mF,soE=2mF....(1)
At each vertex exactly n faces meet, and each face has m vertices. Counting vertex-face incidences gives
nV=mF,soV=nmF....(2)
Substituting (1) and (2) into Euler’s formula V−E+F=2:
nmF−2mF+F=2.
Factor out F:
F(nm−2m+1)=2.
Multiply through by 2n:
F(2m−mn+2n)=4n.
Now expand h=4−(n−2)(m−2):
h=4−(nm−2n−2m+4)=4−nm+2n+2m−4=2m+2n−mn.
So 2m−mn+2n=h, and therefore
Fh=4n,i.e.F=h4n.■
Part (ii): Proving there are exactly five regular polyhedra
Since F⩾4 (a polyhedron has at least 4 faces), we need F=h4n>0. With n⩾3 (at least 3 faces meet at each vertex) and m⩾3 (each face is at least a triangle), we need h>0, i.e.
4−(n−2)(m−2)>0⟹(n−2)(m−2)<4.
Since n⩾3 and m⩾3, we have n−2⩾1 and m−2⩾1. The product of two positive integers being less than 4 gives only these cases:
m
n
(n−2)(m−2)
h
F=h4n
E=2mF
V=nmF
Polyhedron
3
3
1
3
4
6
4
Tetrahedron
3
4
2
2
8
12
6
Octahedron
3
5
3
1
20
30
12
Icosahedron
4
3
2
2
6
12
8
Cube
5
3
3
1
12
30
20
Dodecahedron
For m⩾6, we have m−2⩾4, so (n−2)(m−2)⩾4 for any n⩾3, which violates h>0. Similarly for n⩾6.
Therefore only five pairs (m,n) are possible, corresponding to exactly five regular polyhedra. ■
6 A closed curve is given by the equation
x2/n+y2/n=a2/n(*)
where n is an odd integer and a is a positive constant. Find a parametrization x=x(t), y=y(t) which describes the curve anticlockwise as t ranges from 0 to 2π.
Sketch the curve in the case n=3, justifying the main features of your sketch.
The area A enclosed by such a curve is given by the formula
A=21∫02π[x(t)dtdy(t)−y(t)dtdx(t)]dt.
Use this result to find the area enclosed by (∗) for n=3.
Model Solution
Part (i): Parametrization
The curve is x2/n+y2/n=a2/n where n is odd. We seek a parametrization that traces the curve anticlockwise for t∈[0,2π].
Set
x=acosnt,y=asinnt.
Since n is odd, the n-th root of a negative number is well-defined and real, so x and y take all real values as required. We verify:
As t increases from 0 to 2π, the point (x,y) traces anticlockwise: at t=0 we have (a,0); at t=π/2 we have (0,a); at t=π we have (−a,0); at t=3π/2 we have (0,−a).
Part (ii): Sketch for n=3
The curve x2/3+y2/3=a2/3 is called an astroid (or tetracuspid hypocycloid). Its key features are:
Intercepts: (±a,0) and (0,±a).
Symmetry: symmetric about both axes (replacing x→−x or y→−y leaves the equation unchanged).
Cusps: at each intercept, the curve has a cusp (pointed corner). To see why, note that dxdy at, say, (a,0) corresponds to t=0, where dx/dtdy/dt=−3acos2tsint3asin2tcost=cost−sintt=0=0 from the y-side, but the tangent direction is degenerate at the cusp.
Shape: the curve bulges inward between the axes, forming a concave shape somewhat like a rounded square. This is because when, say, t=π/4, we have x=y=a(22)3=22a, which lies well inside the square with vertices (±a,±a).
7 Let a be a non-zero real number and define a binary operation on the set of real numbers by
x∗y=x+y+axy.
Show that the operation ∗ is associative.
Show that (G,∗) is a group, where G is the set of all real numbers except for one number which you should identify.
Find a subgroup of (G,∗) which has exactly 2 elements.
Model Solution
Associativity
We compute (x∗y)∗z and x∗(y∗z) and show they are equal.
(x∗y)∗z=(x+y+axy)∗z=(x+y+axy)+z+a(x+y+axy)z
=x+y+axy+z+axz+ayz+a2xyz
=x+y+z+axy+axz+ayz+a2xyz(... 1)
x∗(y∗z)=x∗(y+z+ayz)=x+(y+z+ayz)+ax(y+z+ayz)
=x+y+z+ayz+axy+axz+a2xyz
=x+y+z+axy+axz+ayz+a2xyz(... 2)
Since (1) and (2) are identical, (x∗y)∗z=x∗(y∗z) for all real x,y,z. The operation ∗ is associative.
Identifying G and showing it is a group
Identity element. We need e such that x∗e=x for all x∈G:
x+e+axe=x⟹e(1+ax)=0.
For this to hold for all x∈G, we need e=0. Check: x∗0=x+0+0=x and 0∗x=0+x+0=x. So the identity is 0.
Inverse element. Given x∈G, we need x′∈G with x∗x′=0:
x+x′+axx′=0⟹x′(1+ax)=−x⟹x′=1+ax−x.
This expression is defined provided 1+ax=0, i.e. x=−a1. Therefore the element that must be excluded from G is −a1, giving
G=R∖{−a1}.
We verify that x′∈G: if x′=−a1, then 1+ax−x=−a1, giving ax=1+ax, hence 0=1, a contradiction. So x′∈G whenever x∈G.
Closure. We must check that x∗y∈G whenever x,y∈G. Suppose for contradiction that x∗y=−a1:
x+y+axy=−a1⟹a(x+y+axy)=−1⟹ax+ay+a2xy+1=0.
Factorising: (1+ax)(1+ay)=0, so x=−a1 or y=−a1. This contradicts x,y∈G. Hence x∗y∈G.
Summary. The set G=R∖{−1/a} with the operation ∗ satisfies all four group axioms: closure, associativity (proved above), identity (e=0), and inverses (x−1=−1+axx). Therefore (G,∗) is a group.
A subgroup with exactly 2 elements
A subgroup of order 2 has the form {0,g} where g=0 and g∗g=0 (the identity). We solve:
The interval of integration has length 2n2π−2n(n−1)π=2nπ. Since sin2u has period π, this interval contains exactly 2n complete periods. Over each period [kπ,(k+1)π]:
∫kπ(k+1)πsin2udu=2π.
Therefore:
∫2n(n−1)π2n2πsin2udu=2n⋅2π=nπ.
Substituting back:
∫2(n−1)π2nπn21sin2(nx)dx=n31⋅nπ=n2π.
Summing over all n:
∫0∞y2dx=∑n=1∞n2π=π∑n=1∞n21.■
(Using the Basel series ∑n=1∞n21=6π2, the integral evaluates to 6π3.)